UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULESchedule 14A

 

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted byRule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to§240.14a-12 §240.14a-12

 

Regional Management Corp.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

No fee required

No fee required.
Fee computed on table below per Exchange ActRules 14a-6(i)(1) and0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:materials

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange ActRule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)

Amount previously paid:

 

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11


 

 

 


 

 

LOGO

Notice of 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

and Proxy Statement



LOGO

Regional Management Corp.

979 Batesville Road, Suite B

Greer, South Carolina 29651

(864)448-7000

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on April 25, 2019May 19, 2022

To the Stockholders of Regional Management Corp.:

We hereby give notice that the 20192022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Regional Management Corp. will be held exclusively online via the internet on Thursday, April 25, 2019,May 19, 2022, at 8:2:00 a.m. local time, at our headquarters located at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, SC 29651, forp.m. Eastern Daylight Time.  The purposes of the following purposes:meeting are as follows:

 

(1)

To elect the eightnine nominees named in the accompanying Proxy Statement to serve as members of our Board of Directors until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;

 

(2)

To ratify the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022;

 

(3)

To hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and

 

(4)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

We began mailing this Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and our Proxy Statement to stockholders on or about March 27, 2019.April 13, 2022. Only stockholders whose names appear of record on our books at the close of business on March 1, 2019April 4, 2022 will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments thereof.

In light of the uncertainty of the future of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, including any future waves of COVID-19, for the safety of our directors, team members, and stockholders, we have once again determined that the Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only, via the internet, with no physical in-person meeting. If you plan to participate in the virtual meeting, please see “General Information and Frequently Asked Questions” in this Proxy Statement. Stockholders will be able to attend, vote, and submit questions (both before, and during a designated portion of, the meeting) from any location via the internet. The Annual Meeting will be presented exclusively online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting online, vote your shares electronically, and submit your questions to management during the Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022.

To participate in the Annual Meeting (e.g., submit questions and/or vote), you will need the control number provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form. If you are not a stockholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the Annual Meeting as a guest, but you will not be able to participate.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, in person, you are urged to cast your vote promptly in order to assure representation of your shares at the meeting and so that a quorum may be established.In advance of the Annual Meeting, you may vote by Internetinternet or by mail. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person.electronically during the meeting.

 

LOGO

To vote by Internet,internet prior to the meeting, please visitwww.proxyvote.com. Have the enclosed proxy card in hand when you access the website, and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

LOGO

To vote by mail, please complete, date, and sign the enclosed proxy card, and mail it in the enclosed envelope. No postage need be affixed if the proxy card is mailed in the United States.

Regional Management Corp. | Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders


On behalf of our Board of Directors and our management team, we thank you for your interest in Regional and for your participation in the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Catherine R. Atwood

SVP, General Counsel, and Secretary

Greer, South Carolina

April 13, 2022

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2022: The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available free of charge at https://materials.proxyvote.com/75902K and on our Investor Relations website at www.regionalmanagement.com.

 

 

 

LOGO

Brian J. Fisher

SVP, General Counsel, and Secretary

Greer, South Carolina

March 26, 2019

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE

STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON APRIL 25, 2019: The Regional Management Corp. | Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders

Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form10-K are available free of charge at

https://materials.proxyvote.com/75902K and on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com.


 

LOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

2019

Proxy statement

2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

TABLE OF CONTENTSTable of Contents

 

     Page     

Page

20192022 Proxy Statement Summary

1

General Information and Frequently Asked Questions

4

5

Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters

7

8

Director Qualifications

7

8

Board Diversity

7

8

Current Directors and Director Nominees

8

9

Matrix of Director Skills, Experience, and Demographic Background

12

13

Board Independence

13

Leadership Structure

13

14

Meetings

13

14

Committees of the Board

14

15

Role in Risk Oversight

16

17

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

16

18

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

16

18

Communications with the Board

17

18

Director Compensation

17

18

Executive Officers

20

21

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

21

22

Executive Summary of Compensation Programs

21

22

Compensation Objectives and Approaches

25

26

Elements of Compensation

28

29

Other Compensation Policies, Practices, and Matters

36

Compensation Committee Report37

39

Executive Compensation Tables

40

Summary Compensation TableCommittee Report

40

Executive Compensation Tables

41

Summary Compensation Table

41

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

43

44

Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End

44

45

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

46

Equity Compensation Plan Information

47

CEO Pay Ratio

48

Summary of Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers

49

Employment Agreements with Executive Officers

49

Retirement Agreement with Chief Financial Officer

50

Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control

51

Summary of Company Incentive Plans

56

Long-Term Incentive Plans

56

Annual Incentive Plan

57

Stockholder Proposals56

58

Stockholder Proposals

58

Proposal No. 1:  Election of Directors

58

Proposal No. 2:  Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

58

Proposal No. 3:3:  Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

60



LOGO

REGIONAL MANAGEMENT CORP.

979 Batesville Road, Suite B

Greer, South Carolina 29651

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

For the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Held on April 25, 2019May 19, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on April 25, 2019:May 19, 2022:

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form10-K are available free of charge athttps://materials.proxyvote.com/75902Kand on the Investor Relations website of Regional Management Corp. atwww.regionalmanagement.com. www.regionalmanagement.com.

March 26, 2019April 13, 2022

2019 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY2022 Proxy Statement Summary

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. It does not contain all of the information that you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Date:

May 19, 2022

Date:

Time:

2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Thursday, April 25, 2019

Time:

Access:

Virtually via the internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. Instructions as to how you may attend and participate in the virtual Annual Meeting are set forth in the Proxy Statement under “General Information and Frequently Asked Questions – How do I attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online?”

8:00 a.m. local time

Place:

Record Date:

April 4, 2022

Regional Management Corp. Headquarters at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, SC 29651

Record Date:

Voting:

March 1, 2019

Voting:

Stockholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each other proposal. Stockholders may vote in personby proxy or electronically during the virtual Annual Meeting by proxy.visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. Instructions as to how you may cast your vote by proxy are found on the accompanying proxy card and are set forth in the Proxy Statement under “General Information and Frequently Asked Questions – How do I vote?”

Proxy Materials:

The Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed on or about March 27, 2019April 13, 2022 to the stockholders of Regional Management Corp.

Meeting Agenda

 

Proposal

Board Vote

Recommendation

Page Reference

    (for(for more detail)

Election of eightnine directors

FOR ALL

 

FOR ALL

p. 58

Ratification of the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019

2022

FOR

 

FOR

p. 58

Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

FOR

 

FOR

p. 60

Transact other business as may properly come before the meeting

 

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 1

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 1


Election of Director Nominees

The following table provides summary information about each director nominee. The nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast at the meeting will be elected as directors.

 

Director

Committees

Name

Director

Since

Experience/Qualifications    Independent    Committees

    AC    Experience/Qualifications

Independent

    CC    AC

CC

CGN

    CGN    RC

Alvaro G. de Molina,Carlos Palomares,

Chair of the Board

2012

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, Executive Compensation, Accounting, Risk Management

Philip V. Bancroft

2022

Insurance Industry, Leadership, Corporate Finance, Accounting, Risk Management, Regulatory

Robert W. Beck

2020

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, Marketing, M&A, Accounting, Risk Management, Investor Relations

 

 

 

 

Jonathan D. Brown

2018

Financial Services Industry, Capital Allocation, M&A, Corporate Governance, Investor Relations

 

 

Roel C. Campos

2012

Leadership, Cybersecurity, Corporate Governance, Government Affairs, Securities Compliance, Regulatory

C

 

C

Maria Contreras-Sweet

2018

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Corporate Finance, Technology/Innovation, Corporate Governance, Regulatory, Public Relations, Government Affairs

 

C

 

Michael R. Dunn

2014

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, M&A, Risk Management, Investor Relations

 

C

Steven J. Freiberg

2014

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, Marketing, M&A, Executive Compensation, Technology, Risk Management, Investor Relations

C

 

 

C

Peter R. KnitzerSandra K. Johnson

20152020

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, Marketing, Investor RelationsInformation Technology, Cybersecurity, Blockchain Technology, Technology/Innovation, Entrepreneurship

 

Carlos Palomares

2012

Financial Services Industry, Leadership, Credit Risk, Corporate Finance, Executive Compensation, Accounting, Risk Management

 

C

AC = Audit Committee

CC = Compensation

Committee

CGN = Corporate Governance and

Nominating Committee

RC = Risk

Committee

C = Committee Chair


Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 2


Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

As a matter of good corporate governance, we are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.2022.

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

As required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we are providing our stockholders with the opportunity at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to vote on anon-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (commonly known as a“Say-on-Pay “Say-on-Pay Vote”).

2021 Compensation-Related Highlights

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 2

Appointed FW Cook as new independent compensation consultant


2018 Compensation-Related Highlights

 

Returned to pre-COVID short-term incentive plan structure

Continued alignment of executive pay with company performance:

 

2018o

2021 incentives arewere largely performance-contingent,with long-term incentive awards roughlytwo-thirds one-half performance-contingent and short-term incentive awards entirely performance-contingent

 

o

Performance goals arewere rigorousand arewere based almost exclusively on objective, quantitative criteria

 

Maintained competitive compensation and incentive program target opportunities for our executives in order to continue to align their overall compensation with the market for executive talent

 

Set our short-term incentive payout opportunities to provide high upside if performance goals are exceeded, while paying low or no bonus amounts if goals are not achieved

 

Granted long-term incentives, which include a significant portion that is contingent upon the achievement of rigorous and clearly-defined performance measures, to named executive officers and other key contributors, effectively aligning such individuals’ interests with the long-term interests of our stockholders

Compensation Program “Best Practices” Summary

 

Compensation program designed to closely align pay with performance

Significant share ownership guidelines for executives (5x base salary for CEO, 2x for other executive officers)

Significant share ownership guidelines for directors (5x annual cash retainer)

Significant portion of compensation is variable and/or performance-based

No excessive perquisites

✓    No excise taxgross-ups

Formalized clawback policy

✓    Double-trigger change-in-control provisions

Double-triggerchange-in-control provisions

Prohibition against hedging and pledging

Nore-pricing of equity incentive awards without stockholder approval

Independent Compensation Committee

Independent compensation consultant

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 3


Fiscal 20182021 Compensation Summary

The following table sets forth the cash and other compensation that we paid to our named executive officers or that was otherwise earned by our named executive officers for their services in all employment capacities during 2018.2021. See the Summary Compensation Table of the Proxy Statement for additional information.

 

Name and Principal Position

   Salary  
($)
   Bonus  
($)
 Stock
  Awards  
($)
 Option
  Awards  
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
  Compensation  
($)
 All Other
  Compensation  
($)
 Total
($)

 

Peter R. Knitzer,

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

733,314

 

 

733,327

 

 

548,350

 

 

83,701

 

 

2,648,692

 

John D. Schachtel,

Executive Vice President

and Chief Operating Officer

 

 

 

360,000

 

 

 

 

274,986

 

 

 

 

358,920

 

 

72,659

 

 

1,066,565

 

Donald E. Thomas,

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

    355,000    

 

 

    —    

 

 

    177,495    

 

 

    177,499    

 

 

        547,375        

 

 

        45,246        

 

 

1,302,615

 

Daniel J. Taggart,

Executive Vice President

and Chief Credit Risk Officer

 

 

 

330,000

 

 

 

 

109,977

 

 

109,998

 

 

448,648

 

 

25,993

 

 

    1,024,616    

 

Brian J. Fisher,

Senior Vice President, General Counsel,

and Secretary

 

 

 

300,000

 

 

 

 

99,977

 

 

100,000

 

 

410,774

 

 

16,963

 

 

927,714

Name and Principal Position

 

Salary

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards

($)

 

 

Option

Awards

($)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation

($)

 

 

All Other

Compensation

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Robert W. Beck,

 

 

640,000

 

 

 

1,119,953

 

 

 

559,992

 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

42,179

 

 

 

3,726,285

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Harpreet Rana,

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

166,240

 

 

 

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

20,877

 

 

 

1,155,517

 

Executive Vice President and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel,

 

 

428,000

 

 

 

320,997

 

 

 

160,499

 

 

 

779,863

 

 

 

46,055

 

 

 

1,735,413

 

Executive Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and Chief Operating Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Fisher,

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

299,964

 

 

 

149,996

 

 

 

664,252

 

 

 

25,699

 

 

 

1,539,911

 

Executive Vice President and Chief

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Strategy and Development Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manish Parmar,

 

 

352,000

 

 

 

263,941

 

 

 

131,990

 

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

24,879

 

 

 

1,273,003

 

Executive Vice President and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Credit Risk Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

Note:  The amounts shown in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column represent: (i) for Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and Mr. Parmar, performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2021 and (ii) for Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher, performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2021 and cash-settled performance units that were granted in 2019 and earned over a performance period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2021.

2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by us no later than November 28, 2019.December 14, 2022.

 

Notice of stockholder proposals outside of SEC Rule14a-8 must be delivered to us not earlier than December 27, 2019January 19, 2023 and not later than January 26, 2020.February 18, 2023.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 4

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 3

GENERAL Information and


GENERAL INFORMATION AND

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONSFrequently Asked Questions

This proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) and the accompanying proxy card are first being sent on or about March 27, 2019,April 13, 2022, to the stockholders of Regional Management Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Regional,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our”), in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board of Directors (the “Board”) for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held on April 25, 2019,May 19, 2022, at Regional’s headquarters located at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, SC 29651, at 8:2:00 a.m. local timep.m. Eastern Daylight Time and any postponement or adjournment thereof. Our Annual Report on Form10-K, containing financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, is being mailed together with this Proxy Statement to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Why did I receive a proxy card and Proxy Statement?

As a stockholder of record on March 1, 2019,April 4, 2022, you are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. The accompanying proxy card is for use at the Annual Meeting if a stockholder either will be unable to attend in personvirtually on May 19, 2022 or will attend virtually but wishes to vote by proxy in advance of the Annual Meeting. Even if you plan to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, in person, you are encouraged to vote by proxy in advance. Instructions as to how you may cast your vote by proxy are found on the proxy card. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person.electronically during the virtual Annual Meeting.

The proxy card is solicited by mail by and on behalf of the Board, and the cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by us. In addition to solicitations by mail, proxies may be solicited in person, by telephone, or via the Internetinternet by our directors and officers who will not receive additional compensation for such services. We will request banks, brokerage houses, and other institutions, nominees, and fiduciaries to forward the soliciting material to beneficial owners and to obtain authorization for the execution of proxies. We will, upon request, reimburse these parties for their reasonable expenses in forwarding proxy materials to our beneficial owners.

Why is the Annual Meeting taking place virtually this year?

We will host the Annual Meeting exclusively live online this year due to the circumstances surrounding the continued existence and uncertainty surrounding the future spread of the coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic. As a result, and in order to protect the health and well-being of our directors, team members, and stockholders, we have once again decided to hold the Annual Meeting exclusively online.

How do I attend and participate in the Annual Meeting online?

We will host the Annual Meeting exclusively live online. Any stockholder can attend the Annual Meeting live online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. To enter the Annual Meeting, you will need to log in with the control number provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form. Once you are logged in to the Annual Meeting, instructions on how to participate, including how to submit questions and vote during the meeting, will be provided at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. If you are not a stockholder or do not have a control number, you may still access the meeting as a guest, but you will not be able to participate. We are committed to ensuring that our stockholders have the same rights and opportunities to participate in the Annual Meeting as if it had been held in a physical location. If you have questions about accessing the website for the virtual Annual Meeting, please contact the Company’s Corporate Secretary by sending an email to investor.relations@regionalmanagement.com or calling (864) 448-7000 by May 16, 2022. If you encounter any technical difficulties with the log-in process or during the Annual Meeting, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the virtual Annual Meeting website.

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Edge, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and mobile phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Stockholders (or their authorized representatives) should ensure that they have a strong Wi-Fi connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Stockholders (or their authorized representatives) should also give themselves plenty of time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

The purpose of the Annual Meeting is:

 

(i)

to elect the eightnine nominees named in the Proxy Statement to serve as members of the Board until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;

 

(ii)

to ratify the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022;

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 5


 

(iii)

(iii)

to hold an advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and

 

(iv)

to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.

Who is entitled to vote?

Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2019April 4, 2022 (the “Record Date”), will be entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. As of the Record Date, 11,828,8069,790,219 shares of our common stock, $0.10 par value per share, were outstanding. The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share for each director nominee and to one vote per share on any other proposal presented at the Annual Meeting.

Brokers that are members of certain securities exchanges and that hold shares of our common stock in “street name” on behalf of beneficial owners have authority to vote on certain items when they have not received instructions from beneficial owners. Under the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) rules and regulations governing such brokers, the proposal to ratify the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is considered a “discretionary” item. This means that brokers may vote in their discretion on this proposal on behalf of beneficial owners who have not furnished voting instructions. In contrast, certain items are considered“non-discretionary, “non-discretionary, and a “brokernon-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner votes on one proposal but does not vote on another proposal because, with respect to such other proposal, the nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. The proposals to elect directors and to approve executive compensation are considered “non-

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 4


discretionary,“non-discretionary,” and therefore, brokers cannot vote your shares on these proposals when they do not receive voting instructions from you.

What constitutes a quorum?

The representation, in personvirtually or by proxy, of at least a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Votes withheld from any nominee, abstentions, and “brokernon-votes” are counted as present or represented for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the Annual Meeting.Meeting but do not represent votes cast. Virtual attendance at our Annual Meeting constitutes presence in person for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum at the meeting.

Can I ask questions at the virtual Annual Meeting?

Stockholders as of the Record Date who attend and participate in our virtual Annual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022will have an opportunity to submit questions about topics of importance to the Company’s business and affairs live via the internet during a designated portion of the meeting. Instructions for submitting questions during the virtual Annual Meeting will be available at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. Stockholders may also submit a question in advance of the Annual Meeting at www.proxyvote.com. In both cases, stockholders must have available their control number provided on their proxy card or voting instruction form. All questions from stockholders that are pertinent to Annual Meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time limitations.

How do I vote?

Stockholders may vote in personby proxy or by proxy.attending the virtual Annual Meeting online and voting electronically during the Annual Meeting. Instructions as to how you may cast your vote by proxy are set forth below and are found on the accompanying proxy card.

 

LOGOVote in Person:If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may vote in person even if you have previously returned your proxy card.

LOGO

Vote by Internet (Internet:

Before the Meeting – Go to www.proxyvote.com):

Use the Internetinternet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 24, 2019.May 18, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website, and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During the Meeting – Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022

You may attend the meeting via the internet and vote electronically during the meeting. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website, and follow the instructions.

LOGO

Vote by Mail:Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and promptly return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 6


Will other matters be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

Aside from the three proposals described above, the Board knows of no other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote properly may be taken, shares represented by all proxies received by the Board will be voted with respect thereto in accordance with the best judgment of the persons named as proxy holders andattorneys-in-fact in the proxies.

May I revoke my proxy instructions?

Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by the person giving it at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting. Proxies may be revoked by (i) filing with our Corporate Secretary, before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting, a written notice of revocation bearing a later date than the proxy; (ii) duly completing a later-dated proxy card relating to the same shares and delivering it to our Corporate Secretary before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting; or (iii) attending the virtual Annual Meeting and voting in personelectronically (although attendance at the Annual Meeting will not in and of itself constitute a revocation of a proxy). Any written notice of revocation or subsequent proxy should be sent so as to be delivered to Regional Management Corp., 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651, Attention: Corporate Secretary, before the taking of the vote at the Annual Meeting.

How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

With respect to the proposal to elect directors (Proposal No. 1), the eightnine nominees receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the shares present, virtually or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting shall be elected as directors. Votes withheld, abstentions, and “broker non-votes” will have no effect on the election of directors (Proposal No. 1). Regarding the proposal to ratify the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20192022 (Proposal No. 2), an affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present, in personvirtually or represented by proxy, and voting on such matter is required for approval. Likewise, the compensation of executive officers (Proposal No. 3) will be approved, on an advisory basis, if a majority of the shares present, in personvirtually or represented by proxy, and voting on such matter is cast in favor of the proposal. “Brokernon-votes” non-votes,” votes withheld, and abstentions are not considered voted for the particular matter, and formatter. For proposals subject to majority voting that are considered “non-discretionary” (Proposal No. 2 and Proposal No. 3), “brokernon-votes” have the effect of reducing the number of

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 5


affirmative votes required to achieve a majority for such matter by reducing the total number of shares from which the majority is calculated. For proposals subject to majority voting that are considered “discretionary” (Proposal No. 2), there will be no “broker non-votes” and brokers may vote in their discretion on behalf of beneficial owners who have not furnished voting instructions. Virtual attendance at our Annual Meeting constitutes presence for purposes of the vote required under our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”).

Because your vote on Proposal No. 3 is advisory, it will not be binding on us, our Board, or our Compensation Committee. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of this vote when making future compensation decisions for our executive officers.

The persons named as proxy holders andattorneys-in-fact in the proxy card, PeterRobert W. Beck and Catherine R. Knitzer and Brian J. Fisher,Atwood, were selected by the Board and are officers of the Company. All properly executed proxy cards returned in time to be counted at the Annual Meeting will be voted by such persons at the Annual Meeting. Where a choice has been specified on the proxy card with respect to the foregoing matters, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the specifications. If no such specifications are indicated, such shares will be voted “FOR” the election of all director nominees, “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm, and “FOR” the advisory approval of executive compensation.

How can I correspond directly with Regional Management Corp.?

The address of our principal executive office is 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651, and our telephone number is(864) 448-7000. In addition, any person interested in communicating directly with the independent Chair of our Board or with any other Board member may address such communication to our Corporate Secretary, 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651, who will forward such communication to the appropriate party.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 7

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 6

Board of Directors and


BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERSCorporate Governance Matters

The Board is responsible for directing and overseeing the management of our business and affairs in a manner consistent with the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. The Board has implemented written Corporate Governance Guidelines designed to assist the Board in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address a number of matters applicable to directors, including Board composition, structure, and policies; director qualification standards; Board meetings; committees of the Board; roles and expectations of the Board and its directors; director compensation; management succession planning; and other matters. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. A stockholder may request a copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651.

Director Qualifications

Our Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Nominating Committee”) is responsible for reviewing the qualifications of potential director candidates and recommending to the Board those candidates to be nominated for election to the Board. The Nominating Committee considers minimum individual qualifications, including relevant career experience, strength of character, mature judgment, familiarity with our business and industry, independence of thought, and an ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board, and all other factors it considers appropriate, which may include age, diversity of background, existing commitments to other businesses, potential conflicts of interest with other pursuits, legal considerations (such as antitrust issues), corporate governance background, financial and accounting background, executive compensation background, and the size, composition, and combined expertise of the existing Board. The Board and the Nominating Committee monitor the mix of specific experience, qualifications, and skills of the Company’s directors in order to ensure that the Board, as a whole, has the necessary tools to perform its oversight function effectively in light of our business and structure. Stockholders may also nominate directors for election at our annual stockholders’ meeting by following the provisions set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, (the “Bylaws”), and in such a case, the Nominating Committee will consider the qualifications of directors proposed by stockholders.

When determining whether director nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and professional and functional skills, taken as a whole, to enable our Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Nominating Committee has focused primarily on the valuable contributions of incumbent directors to our success in recent years and on the skills, experience, and individual attributes that each director nominee brings to the Board, including those discussed in the biographical descriptions and matrix set forth below.

Board Diversity

The Board recognizes and embraces the value of a diverse board of directors in improving the quality of its performance and our success. Diversity promotes the inclusionexchange of different perspectives and ideas, mitigates against groupthink, and ensures that the Board has the opportunity to benefit from all available talent. The Board is committed to inclusion – ensuring that all directors feel welcomed, valued, and able to contribute their opinions. The Board also recognizes the need for its directors to understand and to be able to respond effectively to the financial needs of its diverse customer base. The promotion of a diverse Board makes prudent business sense and makes for better corporate governance.

In February 2018, theThe Board approved its Board Diversity Policy (the “Diversity Policy”), which in February 2018 and most recently amended the Diversity Policy in March 2021. A copy of the Diversity Policy is available on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. The Diversity Policy establishes the Board’s approach to achieving and maintaining diversity on the Board. The Board and the Nominating Committee are committed to actively seeking out highly qualified, diverse candidates to include in the pool from which Board nominees are chosen. The Board seeks to comprise itself of talented and dedicated directors with a diverse mix of expertise in areas needed to foster our business success, as well as a diversity of personal characteristics that include, but are not limited to, gender, race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, age, and geography. The Board and the Nominating Committee implement the Diversity Policy by maintaining a director candidate list comprised of individuals qualified to fill openings on the Board, which includes candidates with useful expertise who possess diverse personal backgrounds. When director openings occur,conducting searches for new directors, the Nominating Committee will include qualified female and/or ethnically diverse individuals from the list will be used to assist in selecting new directors.the pool of candidates. Ultimately, the selection of new directors will be based on the Board’s judgment of the overall

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 7


contributions that a candidate will bring to the Board, giving due weight to diverse personal characteristics that contribute to the Board achieving the objectives of the Diversity Policy.

The Nominating Committee is charged with reviewing all steps taken pursuant to the Diversity Policy on an annual basis, assessing the Board’s progress in achieving and maintaining diversity, and presenting its findings and assessment to the full Board for input. 44% of the current Board is racially or ethnically diverse. In its 2018 annual assessment,2019, the Nominating Committee notedBoard was awarded the following:Latino Corporate Directors

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 8


Association 2019 Corporate Visionary Award in recognition of Regional’s commitment to an inclusive and diverse Board. The Board was also nominated in 2019 for NACD NXT™ recognition by the National Association of Corporate Directors, which applauds exemplary board leadership practices that promote greater diversity and inclusion. In January 2018,2020, the Board appointed two diverse candidatesSandra K. Johnson, Ph.D. as directors of the Board. Maria Contreras-Sweet is the Board’s first Hispanicour second female director and Jonathan D. Brown is the Board’s first director under the age of 40.

In February 2018, the Board adopted the Diversity Policy.

In March 2018, the Company included in its proxy statement a matrix that prominently lists each director’s skills, experience, and demographic background, including diverse characteristics.

Throughout 2018, directors added diverse candidates to the director candidate list required to be maintained by the Diversity Policy.

50% of the Board is comprised of HispanicAfrican American directors.director.

The Nominating Committee and the Board are proud of the diverse characteristics of the Company’s directors and will continue to promote diversity and inclusion initiatives at the Board level and throughout the Company.

Current Directors and Director Nominees

The Board has the discretion to determine the size of the Board, the members of which are elected at each year’s annual meeting of stockholders. Our Board currently consists of eightnine directors: Alvaro G. de Molina,Carlos Palomares, Philip V. Bancroft, Robert W. Beck, Jonathan D. Brown, Roel C. Campos, Maria Contreras-Sweet, Michael R. Dunn, Steven J. Freiberg, Peter R. Knitzer, and Carlos Palomares,Sandra K. Johnson, with Mr. de MolinaPalomares serving as Chair of the Board. Each of these individuals has also been nominated and will stand as a director candidate for election at the Annual Meeting.

Biographical information of each of our directors is provided below. In addition, following the biographical information of our directors, we have provided a matrix summarizing the background, skills, experience, qualifications, and other attributes of our directors that led the Nominating Committee and the Board to conclude that such individuals would provide valuable contributions to our business and should therefore serve our company as its directors.

 

ALVARO G. DE MOLINACarlos Palomares

Age: 77

Age: 61

Director Since: 2012

Chair of the Board

Member of the Audit

Committee and Corporate

Governance and Nominating

Compensation Committee

Mr. de MolinaPalomares has been a director of Regional since March 2012 and currently serves as Chair of the Board. Until 2009,Since 2007, Mr. de Molina was thePalomares has been President and Chief Executive Officer of GMAC LLC, whichSMC Resources, a consulting practice that advises senior executives on business and marketing strategy. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Palomares was Senior Vice President at Capital One Financial Corp., and he originally joined aswas Chief Operating Officer inof Capital One Federal Savings Bank banking unit from 2004 to 2007. Since departing GMAC LLC,Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. de Molina has beenPalomares held a private investor. He joined Cerberus Capital Management for a period during 2007 where he workednumber of senior positions with the operations group, following a17-year career atCitigroup Inc. and its affiliates, including Chief Operating Officer of Citibank Latin America Consumer Bank of America, where he most recently served as itsfrom 1998 to 2001, Chief Financial Officer of Citibank North America Consumer Bank from 2005 until 2007. During his tenure at Bank1997 to 1998, President and CEO of America,Citibank FSB Florida from 1992 to 1997, and Chairman and CEO of Citibank Italia from 1990 to 1992. Mr. de Molina alsoPalomares serves on the boards of directors of Pan American Life Insurance Group, Inc. and Banesco USA, a privately held financial institution. Mr. Palomares earned a B.S. degree in Quantitative Analysis from New York University.

Philip V. Bancroft

Age: 63

Director Since: 2022

Member of the Audit Committee and Risk Committee

Mr. Bancroft has served as a director of Regional since January 2022. He served as the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Chubb Limited, the largest publicly traded property and casualty insurance company in the world, from 2016 to 2021. He was the Chief Financial Officer of ACE Limited from 2001 to ACE’s acquisition of Chubb in 2016, at which time he became the Chief Financial Officer of Chubb. Prior to ACE, Mr. Bancroft served as Partner-in-Charge for the New York Regional Insurance Group of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) from 1996 to 2001 and spent nearly 20 years at PwC in various roles, including ten years as a partner. He currently serves on Saint Joseph’s University Haub School of Business/Advisory Board for Insurance Risk Management. He was certified as a public accountant and earned his Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Temple University.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 9


robert W. Beck

Age: 58

President and Chief Executive Officer

Director Since: 2020

Mr. Beck has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of BancRegional since March 2020. From July 2019 until March 2020, Mr. Beck served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of America Securities,Regional. Prior to joining Regional as Chief Financial Officer in July 2019, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Global Capital Marketsthe Leukemia and Investment Banking,Lymphoma Society. Before that, he spent 29 years at Citibank, serving in various roles. Most recently, Mr. Beck was the Chief Operating Officer of Citibank’s US Retail Bank, after previously serving as Chief Financial Officer of Citibank’s US Consumer and Commercial Bank. Prior to that, Mr. Beck served in a number of different roles at Citibank, including head of Market Risk Management,Citigroup Corporate Finance, head of Citigroup Reengineering, and co-head of Citigroup Corporate Treasurer. Previously, he also served in key roles at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Becton, Dickinson and Company, and PriceWaterhouse LLP (now PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP). From September 2012 until February 2018,M&A. Mr. de Molina servedBeck serves on the board of directors of Walter Investment Management Corp.CSI of St. Louis, Inc., a publicly-held entity which is an asset manager, mortgage servicer,telecom system and mortgage portfolio owner specializingconsulting company. Mr. Beck received his B.S. in less-than-prime,non-conforming,Business Administration and other credit-challenged mortgage assets. He holds a B.S. degreeManagement from Washington University in AccountingSt. Louis and his M.B.A. in Finance and International Business from Fairleigh Dickinson University and an M.B.A. degree from Rutgers BusinessNew York University’s Stern School and is a graduate of the Duke University Advanced Management Program.

Business.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 8


JONATHAN D. BROWN

Age: 37

Age: 34

Director Since: 2018

Member of the Risk Committee

Mr. Brown has served as a director of Regional since January 2018. He is a partner with Basswood Capital Management L.L.C. (“Basswood”), an alternative asset manager with over $1.4 billion of assets under management.manager. Mr. Brown joined Basswood in 2009. In his current role, Mr. Brown is responsible for the research and investment analysis of companies across a broad range of sectors, with a specialized focus on financial services. Prior to Basswood, Mr. Brown worked at Sandelman Partners and Goldman Sachs. Mr. Brown graduated from Emory University’s Goizueta School of Business in 2006 with a B.B.A., holding dual concentrations in Finance and Strategy & Management Consulting, as well as a minor in History.

 

Mr. Brown is the representative of Basswood, our largest stockholder. For a description of our cooperation agreement with Basswood, pursuant to which Mr. Brown is nominated, see “Other Information – Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions – Cooperation Agreement,” below.

ROELRoel C. CAMPOSCampos

Age: 73

Age: 70

Director Since: 2012

Chair of the CorporateAudit Committee

Governance and Nominating

Committee

Member of the Compensation

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Risk Committee

Mr. Campos has served as a director of Regional since March 2012. HeSince February 2016, he has been aan equity partner and, since 2021, he has served as Senior Counsel with the law firm of Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP since February 2016, where he practicesLLP. Mr. Campos has practiced in the areas of securities regulation, corporate governance, and securities enforcement and serves as Chair of the firm’s Securities Enforcement Practice.enforcement. Prior to joining Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Mr. Campos was a partner with Locke Lord LLP (April 2011 to February 2016) and Cooley LLP (September 2007 to April 2011). Prior to that, he received a presidential appointment and served as a Commissioner of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) from 2002 to 2007. Prior to serving with the SEC, Mr. Campos was a founding partner of a Houston-based radio broadcaster. Earlier in his career, he practiced corporate law and later served as a federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Campos currently serves as an independent director for the board of KPMG US LLP. Mr. Campos also previously served from January 2013 to May 2017 on the board of directors of WellCare Health Plans, Inc., a publicly-held entity which providespublic company that provided managed health care services, targeted to government-sponsoredwhich was acquired and merged into Centene Corp., a multi-national health care programs.enterprise. He is currently a director of Paulson International Ltd., a privately-held, Cayman-based hedge fund;was also a director of a private registered broker-dealer, Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.;, which in 2021 was acquired and merged into the TP ICAP group, a member of the Advisory Board of Balyasny Asset Management L.P., a registered investment advisory fund.London-based broker dealer. Mr. Campos also servespreviously served from 2016 to 2020 on the Advisory Board for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), the Board of Visitors to the United States Air Force Academy, andAcademy. Mr. Campos serves on variousnon-profit boards. From 20082009 to 2013, Mr. Campos served on the President’s citizen Presidential Intelligence Advisory Board.Board (the “PIAB”), comprised of selected private citizens who serve as outside advisers to the President on national intelligence issues. Mr. Campos earned ahis B.S. degree from the United States Air Force Academy, received an M.B.A. degree from the University of California, Los Angeles, and aearned his J.D. degree from Harvard Law School.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 10


MARIA CONTRERAS-SWEET

Age: 66

Age: 63Director Since: 2018

Chair of the Corporate

Governance and Nominating

Committee

 

Director Since: 2018

Member of the Corporate

Governance and Nominating

Committee and the Compensation Committee

Ms. Contreras-Sweet has been a director of Regional since January 2018. She is the Managing Partnermanaging partner of Rockway Equity Partners, LLC and sheContreras Sweet Companies, LLC. She previously served as a member of President Obama’s cabinet as the 24th Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration from April 2014 to January 2017. Since March 2017, Ms. Contreras-Sweet has served aswhere she was responsible for a director and member of the audit committee of Sempra Energy, a publicly-traded energy-services company that invests in, develops, and operates energy infrastructure and provides electric and gas services to customers in North and South America.$132 billion loan portfolio. She was a founder of ProAmerica Bank, where she served as Executive Chairwoman from 2006 to 2014, andCo-Founder and Managing Partner of Fortius Holdings, LLC, from 2003 to 2006. Prior to that, Ms. Contreras-Sweet served as the California cabinetCabinet Secretary of the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency from 1999 to 2003.2003, where she oversaw 14 departments including the Department of Financial Institutions and Department of Corporations. Earlier in her career, she was a senior executive with Westinghouse Electric Company’s7-Up/RC Bottling

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 9


Company. Ms. Contreras-Sweet is a director of Sempra Energy, a publicly traded energy services company that invests in, develops, and operates energy infrastructure and provides electric and gas services, where she serves on the audit and compensation committees. She is also a director of TriNet Group, Inc., a publicly traded professional employer organization, where she serves on the nominating and corporate governance committee and chairs the risk committee, as well as Zions Bancorporation, N.A., a publicly traded bank, where she serves on the audit committee. Ms. Contreras-Sweet is a Distinguished Fellow of the LARTA Institute and serves on the Board of Directorsboard of the Bipartisan Policy Center. She has been bestowed with numerous honorary doctorates including from Tufts University,University; Whittier College,College; and California State University, Los Angeles, and La Verne University.
Angeles.  

MICHAELMichael R. DUNNDunn

Age: 70

Age: 67

Director Since: 2014

Chair of the Risk Committee

Mr. Dunn has been a director of Regional since July 2014. He previously served as Chief Executive Officer of Regional from October 2014 through July 2016 and as Executive Chairman of the Board from August 2016 through December 2016. Prior to joining Regional, Mr. Dunn was a partner at the private equity firm of Brysam Global Partners, a specialized firm focusing on investment in international banking and consumer lending companies, from 2007 through 2013. Mr. Dunn served as a board or alternate board member for all of Brysam’s portfolio companies. Prior to that, Mr. Dunn was with Citigroup for over 30 years, where he was the Chief Financial Officer of the Global Consumer Group from 1996 through 2007, adding the title of Chief Operating Officer of the Group in 2005. He was also a member of the Citigroup Management and Operating Committees. Mr. Dunn previously served on the boards of Banamex, a wholly-ownedwholly owned Mexican bank subsidiary of Citigroup, and on the U.S.-based Student Loan Corporation, of which Citigroup owned a majority interest. He holds a B.S. degree from New York University and attended the University of Michigan Executive Program. He is a Certified Public Accountant in New York State.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 11


STEVENSteven J. FREIBERGFreiberg

Age: 65

Age: 62

Director Since: 2014

Chair of the Compensation Committee

Committee

Member of the Audit

Committee

Mr. Freiberg has been a director of Regional since July 2014. He has beenis the founder of Grand Vista Partners (a private investment office), a Senior Advisor to Towerbook Capital Partners (a private equity firm), and a Senior Advisor to The Boston Consulting Group since December 2012.(a global management consulting firm). Previously, Mr. Freiberg served as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Social Finance, Inc. from May 2017 until April 2018 and as a director and the Chief Executive Officer of E*TRADE Financial Corporation from April 2010 until August 2012. Prior to joining E*TRADE, Mr. Freiberg spent 30 years at Citigroup and its predecessor companies and affiliates. Among his notable roles at Citigroup, Mr. Freiberg served asCo-Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup’s Global Consumer Group, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citi Cards—Citigroup’s leading global credit card business—and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citigroup’s North American Investment Products Division. Additionally, he was a member of Citigroup’s Executive, Management, and Operating Committees, and he served on the board of directors of several of Citigroup’s affiliates, including Citibank N.A., Citicorp Credit Services Inc., Citicorp Investment Services, Citicorp Insurance Group, Citibank Trust N.A., Citibank FSB, and the Citigroup Foundation. Mr. Freiberg has served on the board of directors of MasterCard Incorporated, a publicly-tradedpublicly traded multinational financial services corporation, since September 2006 (with his term ending in 2022 due to tenure limits) and currently chairs its audit committee. He also served on the former U.S. region board of MasterCard from January 2001 until May 2006 and served as Chairman of MasterCard’s United States region board from 2004 until May 2006. In addition, Mr. Freiberg currently serves as Vice Chair of the board of directors of SoFi Technologies, Inc., a publicly traded personal finance company where he serves on the risk committee. Mr. Freiberg also serves on the board of directors or equivalentfor two publicly traded blank check companies – Compass Digital Acquisition Corp. and Portage Fintech Acquisition Corp. (where he also serves as Chairman), in addition to serving on the governing body of Social Finance, Inc. (a private online personal finance company that provides student loan refinancing, mortgages, and personal loans), Fair Square Financial, LLC (a private credit card issuer that provides credit cards to “near-prime” customers), and Purchasing Power, LLC (a private specialtye-retailer offering consumer products, vacations, and online education services through payment plans). Mr. Freiberg recently becameHe is also the Chair of The Rewards Network, one of the largest merchant-funded, card-linked reward networks in the United States.

  

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 10


PETER R. KNITZERSandra k. johnson, Ph.D.

Age: 61

Age: 60

President and Chief Executive Officer

Director Since: 2015

Mr. Knitzer has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Regional since May 2017. From August 2016 until May 2017, Mr. Knitzer served as Chief Executive Officer of Regional. He has also been a director of Regional since July 2015. Before joining Regional, Mr. Knitzer acted as an advisor to financial services companies since 2013. Prior to 2013, he served as Executive Vice President and head of the Payments group at CIBC and President and Director at E*TRADE Bank. Prior to joining E*TRADE, Mr. Knitzer spent 14 years at Citigroup in various senior roles, including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Citibank North America; Business Head, Cross-Sell Customer Management for all Citigroup businesses; and EVP/Managing Director of Citi Cards, Citigroup’s leading global credit card business. Mr. Knitzer has also previously held senior marketing positions at Chase Manhattan Bank, American Express, and Nabisco Brands. He received his M.B.A. in Marketing and Finance from Columbia University Graduate School of Business and his B.A. in Political Science from Brown University. Mr. Knitzer also served as a Director for Habitat for Humanity from 2008 to 2014, including Board Chair from 2011 to 2013, and on the Advisory Board of Columbia University Business School’s Lang Center for Entrepreneurship from 2015 to 2018.

CARLOS PALOMARES2020

Age: 74

Director Since: 2012

Chair of the Audit Committee

Member of the CompensationCorporate Governance and Nominating Committee and Risk Committee

Mr. Palomares

Dr. Johnson has been a director of Regional since March 2012. Since 2007, Mr. PalomaresApril 2020. She has been Presidentserved as the founder, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Technology Officer of Global Mobile Finance, Inc., a fintech startup company based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, since 2018. In addition, since 2014, she has served as the Chief Executive Officer of SMC Resources,SKJ Visioneering, LLC, a technology consulting practice that advises senior executives on businesscompany. Dr. Johnson currently serves as a Visiting Scholar at North Carolina A&T State University, a role she has held since February 2020. From November 2012 to February 2014, Dr. Johnson served as the Chief Technology Officer for IBM Central, East and marketing strategy. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Palomares was Senior Vice President at Capital One Financial Corp., and he was Chief Operating Officer of Capital One Federal Savings Bank banking unit from 2004 to 2007.West Africa. Prior to joining Capital One, Mr. Palomares held2014, she spent 11 years as a Senior Technical Staff Member of the IBM Systems and Technology Group, serving in various roles, including Business Development Executive for IBM Middle East and Africa, Chief Technology Officer for IBM’s Global Small and Medium Business, and the Linux Performance Architect. Dr. Johnson has conducted extensive research and published her findings in a number of senior positionscomputer-related and information technology areas, she has authored and co-authored over 80 publications, and she was part of the design team that developed the prototype for the IBM Scalable Parallel Processor (SP2), the base machine for “Deep Blue,” IBM’s world-famous chess machine. Dr. Johnson was a member of the IBM Academy of Technology, a group consisting of the top 1% of IBM’s over 250,000 technical professionals. She has also received numerous technical and professional awards and is an IBM Master Inventor with Citigroup Inc.over 40 patents issued and its affiliates, including Chief Operating Officerpending. Dr. Johnson earned her B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Southern University, Stanford University, and Rice University, respectively. She is the first African American woman to earn a Ph.D. in electrical engineering, with a concentration in computer engineering, in the United States. Dr. Johnson is a member of Citibank Latin America Consumer Bank from 1998 to 2001, Chief Financial Officerthe Institute of Citibank North America Consumer Bank from 1997 to 1998, ChairmanElectrical and CEO of Citibank Italia from 1990 to 1992, and President and CEO of Citibank FSB Florida from 1992 to 1997. Mr. Palomares serves on the Boards of Directors of Pan American Life Insurance Group, Inc.Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) and the Coral Gables Trust Company. Mr. Palomares earned a B.S. degree in Quantitative Analysis from New York University.Association for Computing Machinery (“ACM”). She is also an IEEE Fellow and an ACM Distinguished Engineer.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 11


Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 12


Matrix of Director Skills, Experience,Experience, and Demographic Background

The following table provides our stockholders and other interested parties with an overview of our directors’ skills, experience, and demographic background. These qualities are of particular value to our business and led the Nominating Committee and the Board to conclude that such individuals would provide valuable contributions to our company and should therefore serve our company as its directors.

 

  
 Alvaro G.
de Molina
 Jonathan
D. Brown
 Roel C.
Campos
 

Maria
Contreras-

Sweet

 Michael R.
Dunn
 Steven J.
Freiberg
 Peter R.
Knitzer
 Carlos
Palomares

Philip V. Bancroft

Robert W. Beck

Jonathan D. Brown

Roel C. Campos

Maria Contreras-Sweet

Michael R. Dunn

Steven J. Freiberg

Sandra K. Johnson

Carlos Palomares

Skills and Experience

Skills and Experience

Skills and Experience

  

Financial Services Industry

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Other Public Co. Board of Directors

 

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Executive Management

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Entrepreneurship/Business Operations

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Credit Risk Management

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Corporate Finance or Capital Allocation

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Marketing and/or Public Relations

��

     

 

 

 

      
  

Marketing and/or Public Relations

 

 

 

 

Marketing to Hispanic Population

     

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Mergers and Acquisitions

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

    

 

 

 

  

Human Resources/Executive Comp

           

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Cybersecurity or Technology/Innovation

     

 

 

 

   

 

    

 

 

 

  

Information Technology or Blockchain

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate Governance

     

 

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

  

Government Affairs

     

 

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Regulatory and/or SEC Compliance

     

 

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Audit Committee Financial Expert

 

 

         

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

SOX and Internal Audit

     

 

   

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

  

Risk Management

 

 

       

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

  

Business Ethics

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Investor Relations

   

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

Demographic Background

Demographic Background

Demographic Background

Board Tenure and Independence

Board Tenure and Independence

Board Tenure and Independence

  

Year First Appointed or Elected

 

2012

 

 

2018

 

 

2012

 

 

2018

 

 

2014

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2012

 

2022

2020

2018

2012

2018

2014

2014

2020

2012

  

Board Independent

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

   

 

 

 

Gender

Gender

Gender

  

Male

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Female

       

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Age

Age

Age

  

Years Old

 

61

 

 

34

 

 

70

 

 

63

 

 

67

 

 

62

 

 

60

 

 

74

 

63

58

37

73

66

70

65

61

77

Race/Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity

Race/Ethnicity

  

White/Caucasian

   

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

  

Hispanic/Latino

 

 

   

 

 

 

       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

African American

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 12


Board Independence

The Board determined that each of Ms. Contreras-Sweet, Dr. Johnson, and Messrs. Bancroft, Brown, Campos, Freiberg, de Molina,Molina*, and Palomares are eachwere independent during 2021 in accordance with the criteria established by the NYSE for independent board members. The Board performed a review to determine the independence of its members and made a subjective determination as to each of these independent directors that no transactions, relationships, or arrangements exist that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director of

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 13


the Company. In making these determinations, the Board reviewed the information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to the Company and its management. We define an “independent” director in accordance with Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Rules. The categorical standards that the Board has established to assist it in making independence determinations can be found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com.

__________

*

Alvaro G. de Molina’s service as a director on our Board ended at the time of our 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2021 Annual Meeting”).

Leadership Structure

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board may select its Chair and our Chief Executive Officer in any way that it considers to be in our best interests. Therefore, the Board does not have a policy on whether the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined and, if they are to be separate, whether the Chair should be selected from the independent directors.

Mr. de Molina currently servesPalomares was appointed to serve as Chair of our Board.Board in July 2019. At this time, the Board believes that the separation of the roles of Chair and Chief Executive Officer promotes communication between the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, and other senior management, and enhances the Board’s oversight of management. We believe that our leadership structure provides increased accountability of our Chief Executive Officer to the Board and encourages balanced decision-making. We also separate the roles in recognition of the differences in the roles. While the Chief Executive Officer is responsible forday-to-day leadership of the Company and the setting of strategic direction, the Chair of the Board provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer and coordinates and manages the operationoperations of the Board and its committees.

At this time, the Board believes that its current leadership structure, with an independent Chair, of the Board, is appropriate for the Company and provides many advantages to the effective operation of the Board. The Board will periodically evaluate and reassess the effectiveness of this leadership structure.

Meetings

The Board held 1812 meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021. During 2018,2021, each current director then in office attended more thanat least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and committees on which he or she served. In addition to formal Board meetings, our Board communicates from time to time via telephone, electronic mail, and informal meetings, and our Board and its committees may act by written consent in lieu of a formal meeting. Ournon-employee directors met in executive session following each of our regular, quarterly Board meetings in 2018,2021, and the independent members of our Board also periodically met in executive session in 2018.2021. Mr. de MolinaPalomares presides over each executive session of ournon-employee directors and independent directors.

Other than an expectation set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines that each director will make every effort to attend the annual meeting of stockholders, we do not have a formal policy regarding the directors’ attendance at annual meetings. All of our directors then in office attended our last annual meeting of stockholders held on April 25, 2018.May 20, 2021.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 14

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 13



Committees of the Board

Our Board has threefour standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the Risk Committee. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our Board.

 

 

Audit

 

Compensation

 

Corporate Governance
and Nominating

Directors

Audit

Compensation

Corporate Governance
and Nominating

Risk

Philip V. Bancroft

 

Jonathan D. Brown

 

Roel C. Campos

  

 

 Chair

 

Chair

 

Maria Contreras-Sweet

  

 

 

 

 

Chair

 

Michael R. Dunn

 

Chair

Steven J. Freiberg

  

 

 

 

 

 Chair

 

 

Chair

 

Alvaro G. de Molina

  

 

 

 

 

  

 

Sandra K. Johnson

 

Carlos Palomares

  

 

Chair

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

Number of Meetings Held in 2018:

  

 

5

 

 

 

 6

 

 5

 

Number of Meetings Held in 2021:

6

9

7

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee currently consists of Messrs. PalomaresCampos (Chair), Bancroft, Freiberg, and Palomares. Mr. Campos was appointed to the Audit Committee as its Chair in May 2021, replacing former director Alvaro G. de Molina. In accordance with SEC rules and NYSE rules, each of the members of our Audit Committee is an independent director in accordance with the criteria established by the NYSE for the purpose of audit committee membership independence. In addition, the Board has examined the SEC’s definition of “audit committee financial expert” and has determined that Messrs. Palomares,Bancroft, Freiberg, and de MolinaPalomares satisfy this definition.

Pursuant to the Audit Committee’s written charter, our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

selectingappointing and hiringoverseeing our independent registered public accounting firm andpre-approving the audit andnon-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors;

discussing the scope and results of the audit with the independent registered public accounting firm;

assisting the Board in evaluating the qualifications, performance, and independence of our independent auditors;

assisting the Board in monitoring the quality and integrity of our financial statements and our accounting and financial reporting processes;

assisting the Board in monitoring our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

assisting the Board in reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting processes;

assisting the Board in monitoring the performance of our internal audit function;

reviewing with management and our independent auditors our annual and quarterly financial statements;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by us regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees and others of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and

preparing the audit committee report that the SEC requires in our annual proxy statement.

The Audit Committee Charter, which contains a more complete explanation of the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee, is posted on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. A stockholder may request a copy of the Audit Committee Charter by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651. The Audit Committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 14


Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Freiberg (Chair), Mr. Campos, Ms. Contreras-Sweet, and Mr. Palomares. Ms. Contreras-Sweet was appointedMr. de Molina ended service to the Compensation Committee in October 2018.May 2021. In accordance with NYSE rules, each of the members of our Compensation Committee is an independent director in accordance with the criteria established by the NYSE for the purpose of compensation committee

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 15


membership independence. Pursuant to the Compensation Committee’s written charter, our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board with respect to, corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determining and approving our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation level based on such evaluation;

reviewing and approving the compensation of our executive officers, including annual base salary,salaries, annual incentive bonuses, specific goals, equity compensation, employment agreements, and severance andchange-in-control arrangements, and any other benefits, compensation, or termination arrangements;

reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation of our non-employee directors;

reviewing and discussing annually with management our “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”;Analysis;”

preparing the Report of the Compensation Committee; and

reviewing and making recommendations with respect to our equity compensation plans.

The Compensation Committee is entitled to delegate any or all of its responsibilities to subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. Additionally, the Compensation Committee may delegate to one or more of our officers the authority to make grants and awards of cash or options or other equity securities to any of ournon-Section 16 officers under our incentive-compensation or other equity-based plans, as the Compensation Committee deems appropriate and in accordance with the terms of such plans, provided that such delegation is in compliance with such plans and applicable law.

The Compensation Committee Charter, which contains a more complete explanation ofhas the rolesauthority to hire outside advisors and responsibilities of theexperts, including compensation consultants to assist it with director and executive officer compensation determinations. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Committee, is posted onObjectives and Approaches – Compensation Determination Process” for information about our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. A stockholder may request a copy of the Compensation Committee Charter by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651. The Compensation Committee held six meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.independent compensation consultant.

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

Our Nominating Committee consists of Ms. Contreras-Sweet (Chair), Mr. Campos, (Chair), Ms. Contreras-Sweet, and Mr. de Molina.Dr. Johnson. Ms. Contreras-Sweet was appointed toas Chair in May 2021, assuming the Nominating Committee in January 2018, replacingposition from Mr. Palomares.Campos. In accordance with NYSE rules, each of the members of our Nominating Committee is an independent director in accordance with the criteria established by the NYSE for the purpose of corporate governance and nominating committee membership independence. Pursuant to the Nominating Committee’s written charter, the Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other things:

assisting our Board in identifying prospective director nominees and recommending nominees to the Board;

overseeing the evaluation of the Board;

reviewing developments in corporate governance practices and developing, recommending, and maintaining a set of corporate governance guidelines; and

recommending members for each committee of our Board.Board;

developing and overseeing a process for the annual evaluation of the Board, committees of the Board, and management; and

reviewing (i) developments in corporate governance practices, (ii) the adequacy of our certificate of incorporation and by-laws, and (iii) the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines (on a biennial basis).

The Nominating Committee will consider a candidate for director proposed by a stockholder. A candidate must be highly qualified and be both willing to serve and expressly interested in serving on the Board. A stockholder wishing to propose a candidate for the Nominating Committee’s consideration in connection with the Company’s 2020 annual meeting2023 Annual Meeting of stockholders (the “2020Stockholders (“2023 Annual Meeting”) should forward the candidate’s name and information about the candidate’s qualifications to Regional Management Corp., 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651, Attn: Corporate Secretary, not earlier than December 27, 2019January 19, 2023 nor later than January

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 15


26, 2020. If, following the filing and delivery of these proxy materials, the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 20 calendar days from theone-year anniversary date of the 2019 Annual Meeting, we will, in a timely manner, provide notice to our stockholders of the new date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and the new dates by which stockholder proposals submitted both pursuant to and outside of SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by the Company. Such notice will be included in the earliest possible Quarterly Report on Form10-Q under Part II, Item 5.February 18, 2023.

The Nominating Committee will select individuals, including candidates proposed by stockholders, as director nominees who have the highest personal and professional integrity, who have demonstrated exceptional ability and judgment, and who will be most effective, in conjunction with the other nominees to the Board, in collectively serving the long-term interests of our stockholders. In evaluating nominees, the Nominating Committee will consider, among other things, the director qualifications described above and will apply the objectives outlined in theour Diversity Policy.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 16


Risk Committee

Our Risk Committee consists of Mr. Dunn (Chair), Mr. Brown, Mr. Bancroft, Mr. Campos, and Dr. Johnson. Messrs. Brown and Bancroft were appointed to the Committee in May 2021 and January 2022, respectively. Pursuant to the Risk Committee’s written charter, the Risk Committee is responsible for, among other things:

reviewing and discussing our enterprise risk management program with management and our independent registered public accounting firm;

reviewing the key risks facing the Company and discussing those risks with management;

assessing the allocation of risk oversight among the committees of the Board; and

reviewing and discussing with management the Company’s preparedness for handling business interruption and annually approving the Company’s Business Continuity Plan.

Availability of Committee Charters

The Nominating Committee Charter,charters of each of our Board committees, which contains acontain more complete explanationexplanations of the roles and responsibilities of the Nominating Committee, iseach of our Board committees, are posted on our InvestorInvestors Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. Information on our website is not considered part of this Proxy Statement. A stockholder may request a copy of the Nominating Committee Charterany or all of these committee charters by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651. The Nominating Committee held five meetings during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Role in Risk Oversight

As part of its role in risk oversight, our AuditRisk Committee is responsible for reviewing our risk assessment and risk management practices, and for discussing its findings with both management and our independent registered public accounting firm. Management has established an Enterprise Risk Management Program (the “ERM Program”) to ensure that all of the Company’s risks are managed appropriately and consistently at an enterprise-wide level. The ERM Program details principles used to support effective enterprise-wide risk management across the end-to-end risk management lifecycle, and it provides clarity on the expected activities in relation to risk management of the Board, management, and all employees throughout the organization. In 2021, we hired a Chief Risk and Responsibility Officer to oversee the ERM Program. The Board and the AuditRisk Committee periodically receive ERM Program updates from our Chief Risk and Responsibility Officer and management, review the risks that may potentially affect us, as identified and presented by management,review management’s efforts to manage those risks, including risks reflected in our periodic filings. For example, on a periodic basis, members of the Board and the Audit Committee engage with management and/or third-party consultants to assess the cyber threat landscape, to evaluate our information security program, to review the results of penetration testing, and to analyze the design, effectiveness, and ongoing enhancement of our capabilities to monitor, prevent, and respond to cyber threats and events.

The Board may also request supplemental information and disclosure about any other specific areaareas of interest and concern relevant to risks it believes are faced by us and our business. The Board also considers emerging or evolving risks as they arise, such as risks related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and may either meet as a full Board or assign risks to a committee for continuing oversight. The Board and its committees have been actively overseeing the Company’s response to and risk management of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, including regular updates from and discussions with Company management. Topics around this ongoing crisis span a broad range of matters, including: maintaining the health and safety of our employees; minimizing adverse financial impact on affected employees; evaluating the impact of the pandemic on strategy, operations, liquidity, and financial matters; and supporting the communities in which we operate.

The Board believes that our current leadership structure enhances its oversight of risk management because our Chief Executive Officer, who is ultimately responsible for our risk management process, is in the best position to discuss with the Board these key risks and management’s response to them by also serving as a director of the Company.

Role in Cybersecurity Oversight

As part of its risk oversight role, the Board and the Risk Committee provide oversight of management’s efforts to mitigate risk and respond to cyber incidents. For example, on a periodic basis, members of the Board and the Risk Committee engage with management and/or third-party consultants to assess the cyber threat landscape, to evaluate our information security program, to review the results of penetration testing, and to analyze the design, effectiveness, and ongoing enhancement of our capabilities to monitor, prevent, and respond to cyber threats and events. The Company has a comprehensive enterprise-wide cybersecurity program aligned to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) industry standard and maintains cybersecurity risk insurance coverage to defray the costs of potential information security breaches. The Company conducts automated online training at least once a year for its employees and mock phishing campaigns on a regular basis throughout the year. Management briefs the Risk Committee quarterly on information security matters, including the status of the Company’s security posture and our efforts to identify and mitigate cybersecurity risks, and briefs the full Board on such matters at least annually.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 17


Code of Business ConductConduct and Ethics

Our Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Ethics”). The Code of Ethics applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees and must be acknowledged in writing by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. In February 2018, the Board approved certain amendments to the Code of Ethics, which were intended to update and bring the Code of Ethics more in line with current best practices. The Code of Ethics is posted on our Investor Relations website atwww.regionalmanagement.com. A stockholder may request a copy of the Code of Ethics by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina 29651. To the extent permissible under applicable law, the rules of the SEC, and NYSE listing standards, we intend to disclose on our website any amendment to our Code of Ethics, or any grant of a waiver from a provision of our Code of Ethics, that requires disclosure under applicable laws, the rules of the SEC, or NYSE listing standards.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, Mr. Campos,2021, Ms. Contreras-Sweet Mr.and Messrs. Freiberg, de Molina, and Mr. Palomares served on our Compensation Committee, with Ms. Contreras-Sweet having been appointed to the Compensation Committee in October 2018.Committee. No member of the Compensation Committee has ever served as an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or had any relationship during the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of RegulationS-K. In addition, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, none of our executive officers served on the compensation

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 16


committee (or equivalent) or the board of directors of another entity whose executive officer(s) served on our Board or Compensation Committee.

Communications with the Board

Each member of the Board is receptive to and welcomes communications from our stockholders and other interested parties. Stockholders and other interested parties may contact any member (or all members) of the Board, including, without limitation, the Chair of the Board, any independent director, or the independent directors as a group, by addressing such communications or concerns to our Corporate Secretary, 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina, 29651, who will forward such communications to the appropriate party.

If a complaint or concern involves accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, the correspondence will be forwarded to the chair of the Audit Committee. If no particular director is named, such communication will be forwarded, depending on the subject matter, to the chair of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, or NominatingRisk Committee, as appropriate.

Anyone who has concerns regarding (i) questionable accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters, including those regarding the circumvention or attempted circumvention of internal accounting controls or that would otherwise constitute a violation of our accounting policies, (ii) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, or (iii) retaliation against employees who voice such concerns, may communicate these concerns by writing to the attention of the Audit Committee as set forth above or by calling (800)224-2330 at any time.

Director Compensation

Qualitynon-employee directors are critical to our success. We believe that the two primary duties ofnon-employee directors are to effectively represent the long-term interests of our stockholders and to provide guidance to management. As such, our compensation program fornon-employee directors is designed to meet several key objectives:

Adequately compensate directors for their responsibilities and time commitments and for the personal liabilities and risks that they face as directors of a public company;company;

Attract the highest calibernon-employee directors directors by offering a compensation program consistent with those at companies of similar size, complexity, and business character;

Align the interests of directors with our stockholders by providing a significant portion of compensation in equity and requiring directors to own our stock;stock; and

Provide compensation that is simple and transparent to stockholders and reflects corporate governance best practices.

The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee’s executiveindependent compensation consultant, reviews the compensation of ournon-employee directors. In benchmarking director compensation, we use the same compensation peer group that is used to benchmark compensation for our named executive officers (see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Objectives and Approaches – Compensation Determination Process” for information about the peer group).

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 18

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 17



Our employees who serve as directors receive no separate compensation for service on the Board or on committees of the Board. We maintain anon-employee director compensation program structured as follows:

Board Cash Retainer: Prior to April 25, 2018, eachnon-employee Each non-employee director receivedreceives an annual cash retainer of $30,000$70,000 payable in quarterly installments ($50,000 in the case of the chair or lead independent director, if applicable, of the Board). Effective April 25, 2018, the annual cash retainer increased to $70,000 ($90,00095,000 in the case of the chair or lead independent director, if applicable, of the Board).

Committee Member Cash Retainer: Prior to April 25, 2018, each Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee receiveda Board committee receives an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000$8,750 per committee service payable in quarterly installments ($20,000 in the case of the chair of each committee). Effective April 25, 2018, the additional annual cash retainer decreased to $8,750 ($17,500 in the case of the chair of each committee).

Committee Meeting Fees: Prior to April 25, 2018, each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee received a $1,500 meeting fee for each committee meeting attended. Effective April 25, 2018, we no longer pay committee meeting fees.

Board Equity-Based Award: Eachnon-employee director receives, on an annual basis, shares of restricted common stock with a value equal to $90,000 ($110,000115,000 in the case of the chair or lead independent director, if applicable, of the Board). Effective May 19, 2022, these amounts will be increased to $110,000 and $135,000, respectively.

Committee Member Equity-Based Award: Prior to April 25, 2018, each Each member of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating Committee received,a Board committee receives, on an annual basis, additional shares of restricted common stock with a value equal to $10,000 ($20,000 in the case of the chair of each committee). Effective April 25, 2018,$8,750 per committee members instead receive additional shares of restricted common stock with a value equal to $8,750service ($17,500 in the case of the chair of each committee).

The restricted stock awards (each, an “RSA”) are granted on the fifth business day following the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting at which directors are elected. The number of shares subject to the RSA is determined by dividing the value of the award by the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the grant date (rounded down to the nearest whole share).date. The RSA vests and becomesnon-forfeitable as to 100% of the underlying shares on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting (so long as the period between the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting related to the grant date and the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting is not less than 50 weeks), subject to the director’s continued service from the grant date until the vesting date, or upon the earlier occurrence of the director’s termination of service as a director by reason of death or disability or upon a change in control of the Company. In the event of the director’s termination of service for any other reason, the director forfeits the RSA immediately. The RSA is subject to the terms and conditions of the Regional Management Corp. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective April 27, 2017)May 20, 2021 and further amended February 17, 2022) (the “2015 Plan”) and an RSA agreement, the form of which was previously approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board and filed with the SEC.

Under the 2015 Plan, the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to awards granted during any12-month period to anon-employee director, taken together with any cash fees paid during such12-month period to suchnon-employee director in respect of Board service, may not exceed $600,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date of the award). In the event that the service of a director as a director, committee member, or Board or committee chair commences or terminates during the director’s annual service to us, the director’s cash compensation will be adjusted on apro-rata basis. Annual service relates to the approximately12-month period between our annual meetings of stockholders. Each director is also reimbursed for reasonableout-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with his or her service on our Board, including the cost of attending continuing education seminars related to corporate board of directors service and other topics relevant to the Company.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 18


The following table provides information regarding the compensation paid to each of ournon-employee directors for their service asnon-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

 

Name(1)

 Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
            ($)            

 

       Stock Awards      
($)(2)
 Total
        ($)        

Directors:

   

Name(1)

 

Fees Earned or

Paid in Cash(2)

($)

 

 

Stock Awards(3)

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Incumbent Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Philip Bancroft

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jonathan D. Brown

 

 

 

 

 

55,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

112,212

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

167,491  

 

 

 

 

 

77,822

 

 

 

98,725

 

 

 

176,546

 

Roel C. Campos

 

 

 

 

 

95,297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

211,528  

 

 

 

 

 

104,783

 

 

 

124,989

 

 

 

229,771

 

Maria Contreras-Sweet

 

 

 

 

 

68,370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

123,452

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

191,822  

 

 

 

 

 

95,796

 

 

 

116,218

 

 

 

212,014

 

Michael R. Dunn

 

 

 

 

 

57,363

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

89,976

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

147,339  

 

 

 

 

 

90,411

 

 

 

107,495

 

 

 

197,906

 

Steven J. Freiberg

 

 

 

 

 

95,297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

211,528  

 

 

 

 

 

99,398

 

 

 

116,218

 

 

 

215,616

 

Sandra K. Johnson

 

 

90,411

 

 

 

107,495

 

 

 

197,906

 

Carlos Palomares

 

 

116,088

 

 

 

132,493

 

 

 

248,581

 

Former Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alvaro G. de Molina

 

 

 

 

 

104,652

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

127,478

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

232,130  

 

 

 

 

 

64,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,230

 

Carlos Palomares

 

 

 

 

 

96,020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

116,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

212,251  

 

 

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 19


 

__________

(1)

The compensation shown in the table reflectspro-rated amounts based on the following: (a) Mr. Brown and Ms. Contreras-Sweet wereBancroft was appointed as directorsa director in January 2018,2022. Therefore, he received no compensation during 2021. Mr. de Molina did not stand for re-election as a director at which time Ms. Contreras-Sweet was also appointedour 2021 Annual Meeting.

(2)

The amount paid in cash includes the relevant cash retainers described above plus cash payments pursuant to the Nominating Committee; (b) in January 2018, Mr. Palomares resigned fromvesting of dividend equivalent rights held by the Nominating Committee; and (c) in October 2018, Ms. Contreras-Sweet was appointed to the Compensation Committee.directors.

(2)

(3)

At the time of the appointment of Mr. Brown and Ms. Contreras-Sweet as directors in January 2018,On May 27, 2021, in accordance with thenon-employee director compensation program outlined above, we awarded Mr. Brown and Ms. Contreras-Sweetall of the Company’s non-employee directors then in office shares of restricted common stock in the following amounts: Mr. Brown, 799 shares, and Ms. Contreras-Sweet, 888 shares. These RSAs vested on the date of the 2018 annual stockholders’ meeting. In addition, on May 2, 2018, in accordance with thenon-employee director compensation program outlined above, we awarded all of the Company’snon-employee directors shares of restricted common stock in the following amounts: Mr. Brown, 2,6082,105 shares; Mr. Campos, 3,3692,665 shares; Ms. Contreras-Sweet, 2,8622,478 shares; Mr. Dunn, 2,6082,292 shares; Mr. Freiberg, 3,3692,478 shares; Mr. de Molina, 3,695Dr. Johnson, 2,292 shares; and Mr. Palomares, 3,3692,825 shares. These annual RSAs vest on the earlier of the first anniversary of the grant date or the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting (so long as the period between the date of the annual stockholders’ meeting related to the grant date and the date of the next annual stockholders’ meeting is not less than 50 weeks), subject to continued service of the director until the vesting date or as otherwise provided in the award agreement. Amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.

The total number of shares subject to RSAs held by each of ournon-employee directors as of December 31, 20182021 was: Mr. Brown, 2,6082,105 shares; Mr. Campos, 3,3692,665 shares; Ms. Contreras-Sweet, 2,8622,478 shares; Mr. Dunn, 2,6082,292 shares; Mr. Freiberg, 3,3692,478 shares; Mr. de Molina, 3,695Dr. Johnson, 2,292 shares; and Mr. Palomares, 3,3692,825 shares. In addition, as of December 31, 2018, Mr. Dunn held a performance-contingent restricted stock unit (“RSU”) award granted to him during his service as our Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which 10,166 target shares remained outstanding. This RSU vested on December 31, 2018, and in March 2019, our Compensation Committee determined that 116.5% of the target shares were earned based upon our performance over a three-year performance period that began on January 1, 2016 and ended on December 31, 2018. The total number of shares subject tonon-qualified stock options held by each of ournon-employee directors as of December 31, 20182021 was: Mr. Campos, 28,67014,670 shares; Mr. Dunn, 148,86649,174 shares; Mr. Freiberg, 17,941 shares; Mr. de Molina, 30,166 shares; and Mr. Palomares, 28,67018,670 shares. As of December 31, 2021, Mr. Brown, and Ms. Contreras-Sweet, and Dr. Johnson had no option awards outstanding as of December 31, 2018.outstanding. The outstanding equity awards held by Mr. KnitzerBeck as of December 31, 20182021 are set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End table that is presented elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee increasedCurrently, our director stock ownership requirement from 3x tois 5x the annual cash retainer, placing the dollar value of the ownership requirement in the 90th percentile ofabove our peer group.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 19

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 20


EXECUTIVE OFFICERSExecutive Officers

The following is a brief description of the background, business experience, and certain other information regarding each of our executive officers:

Peter R. KnitzerRobert W. Beck (age 60)58) has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Regional since May 2017. From August 2016 until May 2017, Mr. Knitzer servedand as Chief Executive Officer of Regional. He has also been a director of Regional since March 2020. From July 2015.2019 until March 2020, Mr. Knitzer’sBeck served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Regional. Mr. Beck’s full biographical information is set forth above under “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters – Current Directors and Director Nominees.”

Harpreet Rana (age 50) has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Regional since November 2020. Ms. Rana has 20 years of financial services experience, with extensive skills related to capital and credit management, driving profitable portfolio growth, digital product development and transformation, and retail banking management. From 2016 through 2020, Ms. Rana was Managing Director, North America Retail Bank at Citigroup. From 2013 through 2015, she held various additional lead positions in business and finance roles at Citigroup, including Head of US Retail Deposit & Lending Products. Ms. Rana received her B.A. from the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada and her M.B.A. from the University of Rochester in Rochester, New York.

John D. Schachtel (age 57)60) has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Regional since May 2017. Mr. Schachtel has more than 30 years of experience in consumer financial services. From 2013 until 2016, Mr. Schachtel was the Chief Operating Officer of OneMain Financial Holdings, Inc. (formerly known as CitiFinancial). As Chief Operating Officer of OneMain Financial, Mr. Schachtel’s responsibilities included management and oversight of sales, field operations, marketing, and collections. Prior to assuming the Chief Operating Officer role, Mr. Schachtel served for over 10 years as OneMain/CitiFinancial’s Executive Vice President, Northeast and Midwest Division. Mr. Schachtel also held various other positions at OneMain/CitiFinancial during his29-year career with the company, including Operations Director and Director of Field Compensation, New Branch Development, and Project Management, before becoming Senior Vice President of Corporate Marketing in 1999. Since March 2017, Mr. Schachtel has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of SilverSun Technologies, Inc., a publicly-traded business application, technology, and consulting company. He serves as the chairman of SilverSun’s compensation committee and its nominating and corporate governance committee, as well as a member of its audit committee and its nominating and corporate governance committee. He received his M.B.A. in Finance from New York University and his B.S. degree in Industrial Engineering and Economics from Northwestern University.

Donald E. ThomasBrian J. Fisher (age 60)38) has served as Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialStrategy and Development Officer of Regional since September 2020. Between January 2013.2013 and September 2020, Mr. Thomas has over 30 years of finance and accounting experience in public and private companies, having previously served since April 2010 as Chief Financial Officer of TMX Finance LLC, a title lending company. Prior to joining TMX Finance LLC, Mr. Thomas spent 17 years with7-Eleven, an operator of convenience stores, where he served in various capacities, including Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, acting Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Operations, and Vice President of Human Resources. Prior to7-Eleven, Mr. Thomas spent 11 years in the audit function of Deloitte & Touche LLP and one year with the Trane Company as a financial manager. Mr. Thomas earned accounting and finance degrees from Tarleton State University and is a certified public accountant and certified global management accountant.

Daniel J. Taggart(age 46) hasFisher served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer of Regional since October 2018. From January 2015 (when he joined Regional) until October 2018, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer. Prior to joining Regional, Mr. Taggart was Executive Vice President of Agility 360, a financial services consultancy. Prior to that, he was Senior Vice President at Wingspan Portfolio Advisors, a specialty mortgage service provider, and also served as Executive Vice President of REDC Default Solutions LLC, a startup division of Auction.com, LLC, a mortgage loss mitigation subservicing company. Before joining REDC Default Solutions LLC, Mr. Taggart spent 11 years at Citigroup, where he held a variety of positions, including Senior Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of CitiMortgage Default Risk Management, Senior Vice President and Senior Credit Officer of Retail Distribution Risk Management, and Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of CitiFinancial (now known as OneMain Financial). Mr. Taggart has also worked for The Associates (prior to its acquisition by Citigroup), FirstPlus Financial, and Fleet Bank in risk management and loan servicing functions. Mr. Taggart received his B.S. in Finance from Canisius College.

Brian J. Fisher (age 35) has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Regional since February 2018. From January 2013 (when he joined Regional) until February 2018, he served as Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary.Regional. Prior to joining Regional, Mr. Fisher was an attorney in the Corporate and Securities practice group of Womble Carlyle Sandridge and Rice, LLP (now known as Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP) from 2009 to 2013. Mr. Fisher holds a B.A. degree in Economics from Furman University and a J.D. degree from the University of South Carolina School of Law.

Manish Parmar (age 44) has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer of Regional since January 2020. Mr. Parmar has nearly 20 years of credit and financial experience across a broad range of functions, including credit risk, analytics, financial partnerships, database marketing, and modeling. Prior to joining Regional, Mr. Parmar was Chief Credit and Analytics Officer at Conn’s, Inc., a publicly-traded specialty retailer, since 2018. Prior to his tenure at Conn’s, Mr. Parmar held several senior management roles at Discover Financial Services from 2013 to 2018, ultimately becoming its Head of Consumer Credit Risk Management. Mr. Parmar received a Bachelor of Chemical Engineering from the University of Mumbai in India, and his M.B.A. from Bauer College of Business at the University of Houston.

Catherine R. Atwood (age 39) has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of Regional since September 2020. Prior to September 2020, Ms. Atwood served as VP, Deputy General Counsel, and Chief Compliance Officer since May 2017. From August 2014 (when she joined Regional) until May 2017, she served as Deputy General Counsel. Prior to joining Regional, Ms. Atwood was an attorney in the Business Litigation practice group of Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP (now known as Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP) from 2008 to 2014. Ms. Atwood holds a B.A. degree in Political Science from Clemson University and a J.D. degree from the University of Georgia School of Law.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 20

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 21


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISDiscussion and Analysis

The following discussion of the compensation arrangements of our executive officers should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.proxy statement. Actual compensation programs that we adopt following the date of this Proxy Statementproxy statement may differ materially from the existing and currently planned programs summarized in this discussion.

Executive Summary of Compensation Programs

Company Performance and Business Highlights in 20182021

In 2021, we posted a number of annual and quarterly records on both our income statement and balance sheet, as we grew our loan portfolio, gained market share, maintained a strong credit profile, appropriately managed our operating expenses, diversified our funding sources, decreased our funding costs, and hedged our interest rate risk.

Loan Portfolio Growth and Increased Revenues: In 2021, we grew our net finance receivables by a record $290 million, or 25.5%, to an all-time high of $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2021. Our receivables growth in turn fueled record revenue of $428 million in 2021, up 14.6% from 2020.

Strong Credit Performance: While portfolio delinquencies continued to normalize in line with expectations towards the end of the year, our credit profile remained stronger than pre-pandemic levels thanks to the quality and adaptability of our underwriting criteria and our custom scorecards. Our contractual delinquency as a percentage of net finance receivables as of the end of 2021 was 6.0%, which was 70 basis points above the prior year-end but still 100 basis points better than December 31, 2019. Our net credit losses as a percentage of average net finance receivables for 2021 was 6.6%, or 230 basis points better than 2020 and 290 basis points better than 2019.

Record Net Income and EPS; Robust Returns: In 2021, we posted a record $88.7 million of net income and a record $8.33 of diluted EPS, increases of 232% and 247%, respectively, compared to 2020. These results drove robust returns of 7.2% ROA and 31.6% ROE in 2021.

Attractive Total Shareholder Returns: We produced another setdelivered very attractive returns to our shareholders in 2021. Our share price increased by 92% in 2021, closing the year at $57.46. Between year-end 2018 and year-end 2021, our share price increased by 139%. In addition, 2021 was our first full year of quarterly dividend payments. We paid $0.95 in dividends to our shareholders in 2021, increased our dividend from $0.20 to $0.25 in the second quarter of 2021, and further increased our dividend from $0.25 to $0.30 in early 2022.

Throughout 2021, we also delivered strong results and benefits to our other stakeholders, including our customers, team members, and communities.

For Our Customers: We continued to execute on our vision of delivering a best-in-class experience to our customers and a basket of useful, accessible, easily understood financial solutions that serve their evolving needs and support their long-term financial wellbeing. We enhanced our digital prequalification experience, launched a guaranteed loan offer program with online fulfillment, expanded our auto-secured and retail loan products, and introduced our valuable credit solutions to millions of new consumers in two new states. We also made the investments necessary to deliver end-to-end digital lending, an improved customer portal, and a mobile app to our customers in 2022. At the same time, we improved the financial wellbeing of our customers, including through our graduation programs. In 2021, we refinanced over 41,000 of our customers’ small loans into large loans, representing $237 million in finance receivables at origination, and reducing these customers’ average APR from 42.8% to 30.7%.

For Our Team Members: We established a $15 per hour minimum wage, rolled out additional compensation increases for hourly employees in amounts well ahead of the inflationary environment, provided an additional week of paid time off and access to bereavement leave, held health and welfare insurance premiums flat, improved our overall benefit offerings, and introduced new training and development programs.

For Our Communities: We continued to make a positive community impact through Regional Reach, an employee-led program dedicated to creating social change and goodwill through community service, charitable giving, and diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. In the spring, we again partnered with the American Heart Association, led all Upstate South Carolina companies in fundraising for the Heart Walk for the second year in a row, and emerged as a top partner for AHA nationwide. Throughout the year, we also provided support to other organizations, such as Harvest Hope food bank and Asian Americans Advancing Justice.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 22


We are pleased with our strong operating and financial results in 2018, including double-digit growth of our loan portfolio, total revenue, and diluted earnings per share.

Loan Portfolio Growth:Our loan portfolio grew by $115 million to $932 million, an increase of 14.0% from the prior year—our fourth consecutive year of double-digit portfolio growth. Our core portfolio of small and large installment loans grew by 21.1%, led by continued, significant expansion in our large loan category.

Increased Revenues and Improved Receivable Efficiency Ratio:Revenues of $307 million in 2018 were up 12.6% from 2017, while operating expenses as a percentage of average finance receivables decreased to 16.4% in 2018 from 17.6% in 2017.

Increased Earnings:Net income for 2018 was $35.3 million and diluted EPS was $2.93, increases of 18.0% and 15.4%, respectively, from 2017.

Long-Term Stock Price Growth: Our stock price at the close of 2018 was $24.05, down from $26.31 at the end of 2017 but up sharply from our stock price of $15.47 at the end of 2015.

In addition, in 2018, we achieved a number of other operating milestones. In February, we completed our transition to a new loan origination and servicing system, a process that began in 2015. Our new system has allowed us to introduce electronic payments, texting and imaging capabilities, an online customer portal, improved lead management, and automated underwriting across our branch network. In the second half of 2018, we began to integrate custom credit models into our automated underwriting processes, which we believe provide a significant improvement over the previous criteria used for underwriting. We also continued to diversify our funding sources in 2018 by closing our first asset-backed securitization (“ABS”) transaction in June, followed by a second ABS transaction in December. Finally, in September and October, we expanded our geographic presence by entering our 10th and 11th states of operation, Missouri and Wisconsin.

We were pleased with our 2018 results,2021, and we believe that the compensation paid to our named executive officers (our “NEOs”) for 20182021 appropriately reflects and rewards their contributions to our performance.

Compensation Program Highlights in 20182021

At our 2018 annual meeting2021 Annual Meeting, following the recommendation of our Compensation Committee and our Board, our stockholders were-approved our 2015 Plan, as amended and restated, which increases the number of shares available for grant under the plan, reflects best compensation practices, allows us to compete successfully for executive talent, and more strongly aligns the interests of our stockholders and our executives. Also, consistent with prior years, our 2021 Annual Meeting included a proposal that provided our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs. Because we only ceased to be an emerging growth company under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act in 2018, this was our first annual meeting of stockholders that included such a“say-on-pay” proposal. We were pleased to report that our stockholders’substantial stockholder approval of our NEOs’ compensation, was nearly unanimous, with 99.8%97.41% of voted shares having been voted in favor of approval.The Compensation Committee considered this strong support in making compensation decisions after the 2021 Annual Meeting.

In 2018, As in all previous years, our Compensation Committee carefully reviewed our executive compensation program to ensure that it is designedits design continued to achieve itsour intended objectives and continues to reflect executive compensation “best practices.” In light2020, the Compensation Committee set 2020 annual performance goals that were reflective of the numerous improvements to our executive compensation programmacroeconomic environment in which we were operating as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2021, based on changes in the years prior to 2018macroeconomic environment and our stockholders’ overwhelming support of the program,Company’s strong performance throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, our Compensation Committee determined not to make any material changesreturn to our executive compensationthe annual incentive program that was in 2018. place in 2019.  

In making itsthe determination to return to the previously existing annual incentive program, our Compensation Committee received advice from its new independent compensation consultant, Veritas Executive Compensation ConsultantsFrederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“VeritasFW Cook”). FW Cook was appointed as the Company’s new independent compensation consultant in February 2021.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 21


Compensation Program Best Practices

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract and retain talented executives to effectively manage and lead our company and to create long-term stockholder value. We compensate our executive officers primarily through a mix of base salary, performance-based annual cash awards, and service- and performance-based long-term incentive awards. Consistent with ourpay-for-performance philosophy, a substantial portion of our executives’ compensation is at risk and linked to the successful performance and management of our company, as measured against rigorous performance goals established by our Compensation Committee. Our 20182021 executive compensation program continued to includeincluded a number of best compensation practices, including the following:

 

Alignment of executive pay with company performance:

 

2018o

2021 incentives are largely performance-contingent,with long-term incentive awards roughlytwo-thirds one-half performance-contingent and short-term incentive awards entirely performance-contingent

 

o

Performance goals are rigorousand are based almost exclusively on objective, quantitative criteria

 

2018

Results exceeded the quantitative 2021 short-term incentive program performance goals were largely achieved,resulting in annual bonus payments at 99.7%142% of target bonuses

 

Our compound annual growth rates (“CAGR”) of pre-provision net income and pre-provision earnings per share between 20162019 and 20182021 ranked in the 6558th percentile and 63rd percentiles, respectively, of our peer group, contributing to the payment of 116.5%95.6% of target performance-contingent restricted stock units and 114.5% of target cash-settled performance units under the performance-contingent awards associated with the 20162019 long-term incentive program

 

Competitive compensation and incentive program target opportunities for our executives in order to continue to align their overall compensation with the market for executive talent

 

Set our

Highly variable short-term incentive payout opportunities to provide high upside if performance goals are exceeded, while paying low or no bonus amounts if goals are not achieved

 

Granted

Focus on long-term incentivesfinancial and strategic goals through long-term incentive grants to NEOs and other key contributors, which include a significant portion that is contingent upon the achievement of rigorous and clearly-defined performance measures over a three-year period

 

No payment of excessive perquisites to any NEO or other key employee

 

No excise tax gross-up payments gross-up paymentsto any NEO or other key employee

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 23


 

Double-trigger change-in-control provisionschange-in-control provisions included in all employment agreements and long-term incentive award agreements

 

Prohibition againstre-pricing of equity incentive awards without stockholder approval under our 2015 Plan

 

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy for NEOs and directors (5x base salary for CEO, 2x base salary for other NEOs, and 5x annual cash retainer for directors)

 

Compensation Recoupment Policy, or “clawback policy,” for NEOs and other key employees

 

Prohibition against hedging and pledging, as set forth in our Code of Ethics and our Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

 

Compensation program governed by anindependent Compensation Committee with input from anindependent compensation consultant

Aligning Pay with Performance

We believe that a substantial portion of our executive officers’ compensation should be tied to their performance and the short- and long-term financial and operating results of our company.

We developed our long-term incentive program in 2014 in consultation with Veritas. In 2013, our Chiefindependent compensation consultant at the time, Veritas Executive Officer and the majorityCompensation Consultants (“Veritas”). We also conducted a review of our NEOs did not receive any long-term incentive awards. In addition, when we appointed a new Chief Executive Officerprogram in late October 2014, he did not receive any long-term incentive awards until we finalized his employment agreement2021 in 2015. As a result, the annualized total direct compensation of our Chief Executive Officers who were serving at the end of 2013 and 2014 was substantially below both the median of our peer group andconsultation with our current Chief Executive Officer’s total direct compensation.independent compensation consultant FW Cook. We believe that the

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 22


creation and evolution of our long-term incentive program since 2014 has been critical to our ability to link our executives’ pay with the performance of our company, to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders, and to remain competitive in the marketplace for executive talent.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 24


Our executive compensation program now embodies ourpay-for-performance philosophy and closely ties the interests of our key executives to those of our stockholders. We heavily weight our executive officers’ compensation in performance-based short- and long-term incentive awards that are designed to reward exceptional performance. The following table describes the program design for each element of our incentive-based pay in 2018.2021.

LOGO

Pay Elements Program Design Short-Term Incentive Program Consists entirely of performance-based awards: Metrics include net income from operations, average finance receivables, net credit losses as a percentage of average finance receivables, total net debt/EBITDA, total general and administrative expense percentage, and an analysis by our Compensation Committee of our executives' execution against short-term strategic objectives Motivates our executives and brings total cash opportunities to competitive levels Significant upside opportunity for high performance, but with a challenging threshold Long-Term Incentive Program Consists of performance-contingent RSUs, cash-settled performance units, and non-qualified stock options: Vesting of performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units is based primarily on the CAGRs of net income and basic earnings per share, respectively, compared to our peer group over a three-year performance period Two-thirds of grant date fair value is in the form of performance-contingent awards Provides strong incentive to meet or exceed pre-established long-term financial goals that align with long-term stockholder interests, and is utilized to attract, retain, and motivate executive talent

Program Design

Short-Term
Incentive Program

Consists entirely of performance-based cash awards:

o  Metrics include net income from operations, average finance receivables, net credit losses as a percentage of average finance receivables, return on assets, total general and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue, and an analysis by our Compensation Committee of our executives’ execution against short-term strategic objectives

Motivates our executives and brings total cash opportunities to competitive levels

Significant upside opportunity for high performance, but with a challenging threshold

Long-Term
Incentive Program

Consists of performance-contingent restricted stock units (“RSUs”), cash-settled performance units, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock awards:

o  Vesting of performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units is based primarily on the compound annual growth rates (“CAGRs”) of pre-provision net income and pre-provision basic earnings per share, respectively, compared to our peer group over a three-year performance period

o  Roughly one-half of grant date fair value is in the form of performance-contingent awards

o  Non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards vest in three equal annual installments, subject to continued employment

Provides strong incentive to meet or exceed pre-established long-term financial goals that align with long-term stockholder interests, and is utilized to attract, retain, and motivate executive talent

The compensation packages of our Chief Executive Officer and our other NEOs are closely aligned with performance. For 2018,2021, the majority of compensation was variable and performance-based:

 

Chief Executive Officer

__________

Target Pay Mix

Other NEO Average

Target Pay Mix

LOGO

LOGO

Note: The Other NEO target pay mix set forth above is the average for Ms. Rana and Messrs. Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart,Fisher, and Fisher. For Mr. Schachtel, we have used his aggregate target pay mix for 2017 (partial year) and 2018, as set forth in his employment agreement and more fully described below.Parmar. The presentation excludes perquisites, which are an immaterial component of our executives’ compensation.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 23


Results of Short- and Long-Term Incentive Programs

Our short-term incentive program provides our executives with the opportunity to earn performance-based annual cash awards pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan (as amended and restated, the “Annual Incentive Plan”). The achievement and

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 25


payment of annual cash awards in 20182021 was tied directly to our financial and operational performance, based primarily (85%) on clearly-defined, objective performance measures and, to a lesser extent (15%), on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its short-term strategic objectives. For 2018,2021, our executive officers were paid 99.7%142% of their target annual bonuses (out of a range of 0% to 150%) under our Annual Incentive Plan as a result of our strong financial and operating results, as well as the management team’s continued successful navigation of the COVID-19 pandemic, significant improvements made to our technology infrastructure, continued strong execution on funding initiatives, advancements in our diversity, equity, and the executioninclusion programs, maintenance of certain key strategic objectives, including the rollout of custom credit scorecardsstrong internal controls, and the closing of two ABS transactions.progress on our digital initiatives.

In recent years,2019, our long-term incentive program has provided for the delivery of long-term incentive awards through a combination of threefour award vehicles:(i) non-qualified stock options, (ii) restricted stock awards, (iii) performance-contingent RSUs, and (iii)(iv) cash-settled performance units. Vesting of each of the performance-contingent awards iswas subject to, among other things, the achievement of performance objectives over a three-year performance period that beginsbegan on January 1,st of the grant year. The three-year performance period established under the 2016 long-term incentive program 2019 and ended on December 31, 2018.2021. Vesting of the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units granted in 20162019 was based primarily (90%) on our CAGRs of pre-provision net income (in the case of the performance-contingent RSUs) and pre-provision basic earnings per share (in the case of the cash-settled performance units) compared to our peer group over the three-year performance period, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. In March 2019,April 2022, as described in greater detail below,later in this Proxy Statement, based upon results achieved during the performance period, our Compensation Committee determined that participants in the 2016 long-term incentive programMessrs. Schachtel and Fisher earned 116.5%95.6% of their target performance-contingent RSUs and 114.5% of their target cash-settled performance units.

Stockholder Outreach and Engagement

Stockholder outreach is a central feature of our investor relations philosophy. We provide numerous opportunities for current and prospective stockholders to gain access to our management team through attendance at investor conferences,one-on-onein-person meetings, and telephone calls. Through these interactions, we are able to educate current and prospective investors about our company, learn about concerns of stockholders, and provide investors with a better understanding of our business model and philosophy. We also receive valuable feedback from investors on topics including strategy, corporate governance, and compensation, which the Board and management take into consideration in making future business and compensation decisions.

Since our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders,2021 Annual Meeting, we reached out to institutional investors owning more than 60%66% of our outstanding common stock (as of September 30, 2018)2021), specifically for the purpose of receiving their feedback regarding executive compensation practices and corporate governance matters. Based on the feedback received, we have made and expect to continue to make certain changes to our compensation and corporate governance practices and disclosures. For example, in the past, certain investors requested that we increase the percentage of independent directors on our Board and improve the gender diversity of our Board. In response, in 2018, we added two new independent directors in 2018, including Maria Contreras-Sweet, and adopted a Board Diversity Policy. SeePolicy (see “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters – Board Diversity.”Diversity”). Independent directors now hold 75%78% of our Board seats. In addition, certain investors expressed concern thatseats, 44% of the current Board is racially or ethnically diverse, and we had granted retention awards in consecutive years (2015 and 2016) to certain executives pursuant to our key employee retention program. In response, we did not grant any retention awards to executive officers in 2017 orhave added two female directors since 2018. More recently, in early 2019, investors suggested that we consider certain amendments to our Bylaws and that were-evaluate the performance metrics and relative weightings within our short-term incentive program. Our Board will consider this investor feedback in 2019.

In 20192022 and beyond, we expect to continue our stockholder outreach, including by making ourselves available to hear stockholder feedback regarding executive compensation and corporate governance practices.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 24


Compensation Objectives and Approaches

Compensation Program Objectives

The primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to attract and retain talented executives to effectively manage and lead our company and to create long-term stockholder value. The compensation packages for our executive officers for 20182021 generally included a base salary, performance-based annual cash awards, service- and performance-based long-term incentive awards, and other benefits. Our current compensation program for our executive officers has been designed based on our view that each component of executive compensation should be set at levels that are necessary, within reasonable parameters, to successfully attract and retain skilled executives, within reasonable parameters, and that are fair and equitable in light of market practices.

Base salaries are intended to provide a minimum, fixed level of cash compensation sufficient to attract and retain an effective management team when considered in combination with other components of our executive compensation program. The base salary element is meant to provide our executive officers with a stable income stream that is commensurate with their responsibilities and to compensate them for services rendered during the fiscal year.

Consistent with ourpay-for-performance strategy, our performance-based annual cash incentive program is customized to achieve specific objectives, reward increased levels of operational success, and place emphasis on appropriate levels of performance measurement. The key goals addressed by our short-term incentive program include (1) achievement of short-term financial and

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 26


operational objectives, (2) increased stockholder value, (3) motivation and attraction of key management talent, (4) rewarding key contributors for performance against established criteria, and (5) focusing on ourpay-for-performance compensation strategy. BenefitsAmounts earned under our short-term incentive program are paid under our Annual Incentive Plan.

Our long-term incentive program, which for 20182021 includednon-qualified stock options, performance-contingent RSUs, and cash-settled performance units, and restricted stock awards, operates in tandem with our short-term incentive program and is consistent with ourpay-for-performance strategy. Performance-based long-term incentives and service-based option awards can provide significant benefits to both our employees and stockholders. These long-term incentives generally are intended to create (1) a strong sense of ownership, (2) focus on achievement of long-term, strategic business objectives, (3) an enhanced linkage between the interests of our executives and stockholders, (4) an enhanced relationship between pay and performance, and (5) an incentive to attract and retain superior employees. Long-term incentive program benefitsawards are issued under our 2015 Plan, which was approved by our stockholders at our 2015 annual meeting of stockholders andre-approved, as amended and restated, at our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders.Plan.

The discussion below includes a review of our compensation program for 20182021 and a preview of certain aspects of our compensation program for 2019.2022. Our NEOs for 20182021 were:

 

LOGO

Peter R. Knitzer President and Chief Executive Officer John D. Schachtel Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Donald E. Thomas Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Daniel J. Taggart Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer Brian J. Fisher Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

Robert W. Beck

President and Chief Executive Officer

Harpreet Rana

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting |

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

John D. Schachtel

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Brian J. Fisher

 25

Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy and Development Officer

Manish Parmar

Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer


Compensation Determination Process

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the compensation determinations for all of our executive officers.officers, taking into consideration the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer for executive officers other than himself. In setting an executive officer’s compensation package and the relative allocation among different types of compensation, we consider the nature of the position, the scope of associated responsibilities, and the individual’s prior experience and skills, and the individual’s compensation expectations, as well as the compensation of our existing executive officers and our general impressions of prevailing conditions in the market for executive talent.

Engagement and Use of an Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has the authority to hire outside advisors and experts, including compensation consultants, to assist it with director and executive officer compensation determinations. SinceFrom 2014 to early 2021, the Compensation Committee has retained the services of Veritas Executive Compensation Consultants, an independent compensation consultant, to better ensure that our compensation practices arewere appropriate for our industry, to review and to make recommendations with respect to executive officer and director cash and equity compensation, and to update our peer group, in each case for the Compensation Committee’s use in setting compensation. In early 2021, the Compensation Committee engaged FW Cook as an independent compensation consultant.

Veritas’Veritas and FW Cook’s recommendations to the Compensation Committee werehave generally been in the form of suggested compensation ranges of compensation or descriptions of policies that Veritas and FW Cook currently considersconsider “best practice” in our industry and for publicly-traded companies. The Compensation Committee used Veritas’Veritas and FW Cook’s reports to further its understanding of executive officer cash and equity compensation practices in the market.

During 2018,2021, Veritas and FW Cook worked only for the Compensation Committee and performed no additional services for the Company or any of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee Chair approved all work performed by Veritas.Veritas and FW Cook. During 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee and the Company did not use the services of any other compensation consultant. The Compensation Committee has also engaged Veritas in 2019 to provide similar services.

Our Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Veritas and FW Cook in 2021 and FW Cook in 2022, in both instances, taking into account among other things, the factors set forth in NYSE rules, andamong other things. Our Compensation Committee has concluded that no conflict of interest exists with respect to the work Veritas or FW Cook performed or performs, as applicable, for our Compensation Committee and that Veritas isand FW Cook are both independent under NYSE rules.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 27


Establishment and Use of a Peer Group

We generally monitor compensation practices in the markets where we compete for executive talent to obtain an overview of market practices and to ensure that we make informed decisions on executive pay packages. For 20182021 compensation decisions, to obtain a sense of the market and a general understanding of current compensation practices, we reviewed the compensation awarded by a peer group of publicly-traded companies. In addition, as described in greater detail below, the vesting of certain of our executives’ long-term incentive awards is determined based upon our financial performance compared to the financial performance of our peer group over a three-year performance period.

At the outset of 2018,2021, based upon prior peer group reviews conducted with the assistance of Veritas, our peer group consisted of the following companies:

 

America’sCar-Mart, Inc. Inc.

  Asta Funding, Inc.

•  Atlanticus Holdings Corp.

•  B. Riley Financial, Inc.

•  Capstead Mortgage Corporation

•  Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

Credit Acceptance Corp.

•  CYS Investments, Inc.

CURO Group Holdings Corp.

Elevate Credit, Inc.

Encore Capital Group, Inc.

Enova International, Inc.

EZCORP, Inc.

FirstCash, Inc.

Goeasy Ltd.

Green Dot Corporation

  JMP Group LLCLendingClub Corporation

Marlin Business Services Corp.

  NewStar Financial, Inc.

•  Nicholas Financial, Inc.

•  On Deck Capital, Inc.

•  OneMain Holdings, Inc.

Oportun Financial Corp.

PRA Group, Inc.

World Acceptance Corporation

In the thirdsecond quarter of 2018,2021, with assistance from Veritas,FW Cook, we reviewedupdated our peer group using a scorecard-based approach that involved applying several filters (e.g., strong financial health, positive shareholder standing, similar in size, similar in industry classification, presence of overlapping peers, and identification as a peer by a proxy advisory firm) and selecting the most qualified peer companies from a broader list of candidates. Based on the evaluation, our Compensation Committee determined to remove Asta Funding,Encore Capital Group, Inc., Capstead Mortgage Corporation,FirstCash, Inc. and NewStar Financial,PRA Group, Inc. from our peer group and to add Elevate Credit,ECN Capital Corp., Medallion Financial Corp., and Nicholas Financial, Inc. and LendingClub Corporation to our peer group.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 26


As a result, our new peer group for 20192022 consists of the following companies. companies:

America’s Car-Mart, Inc.

Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

Credit Acceptance Corp.

CURO Group Holdings Corp.

ECN Capital Corp.

Elevate Credit, Inc.

Enova International, Inc.

EZCORP, Inc.

Goeasy Ltd.

Green Dot Corporation

LendingClub Corporation

Marlin Business Services Corp.

Medallion Financial Corp.

Nicholas Financial, Inc.

OneMain Holdings, Inc.

Oportun Financial Corp.

World Acceptance Corporation

As of the time that the Compensation Committee approved our new peer group, we were in the 2nd quartile of the peer group based on revenue and market capitalization, and enterprise value.we were in the 3rd quartile of the peer group based on net income.

•  America’sCar-Mart, Inc.

•  Atlanticus Holdings Corp.

•  B. Riley Financial, Inc.

•  Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.

•  Credit Acceptance Corp.

•  CYS Investments, Inc.

•  Elevate Credit, Inc.

•  Encore Capital Group, Inc.

•  Enova International, Inc.

•  EZCORP, Inc.

•  FirstCash, Inc.

•  Green Dot Corporation

•  JMP Group LLC

•  LendingClub Corporation

•  Marlin Business Services Corp.

•  Nicholas Financial, Inc.

•  On Deck Capital, Inc.

•  OneMain Holdings, Inc.

•  PRA Group, Inc.

•  World Acceptance Corporation

Proxy advisory firms Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. and/or Glass, Lewis & Co. have identified 17 of these companies (or 85% of our totalThese peer group) as peers of Regional. These companies are largely within the consumer finance or specialty finance industries, are similar in size and/or scope to Regional, and/or are companies that Regional competes against for products, services, and human capital. Some companies included in our peer group will meet some, but not all, of these criteria. For example, OneMain Holdings, Inc. (doing business as OneMain Financial) is larger than us, but it competes directly with us in the consumer finance industry both for customers and for human capital. As a result, despite being a larger company, we believe it is important to include OneMain in our peer group to ensure that we maintain awareness of our direct competition, which will assist in our efforts to retain talented executives and other employees. However, in setting compensation levels for our executive officers, as noted below, our Compensation Committee remains cognizant that OneMain and certain other of our peer companies are larger than us.

Consistent with our compensation objectives of attracting and retaining top executive talent, we believe that the base salaries and performance-based short- and long-term incentive compensation of our executive officers should be set at levels which are competitive with our peer group companies of comparable size, although we do not target any specific pay percentile for our executive officers. The peer group is used more as a general guide, being mindful of the following:

Appropriate base salaries for our executive officers should generally be in line with those paid by peer group companies of comparable size.

Performance-based short- and long-term incentive awards should reward exceptional performance, which can result in overall compensation that can exceed those of peer group companies of comparable size.

TotalActual total compensation for executive officers may approach the higher end of the compensation at such peer group companies of comparable size, but only if high levels of short- and long-term performance are reached.achieved.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 28

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 27



Elements of CompensationCompensation

Each executive officer is eligible to receive a balance of variable and fixed compensation. The following table describes the various forms of compensation used in 2018:2021:

 

LOGO

Pay Elements Component(s) Rationale for Form of Compensation Base Salary Cash To attract and retain executive talent To provide a fixed base of compensation generally aligned to peer group levels Short-Term Incentive Performance-based annual cash bonus To drive the achievement of key business results on an annual basis To recognize individual executives based on their specific and measurable contributions To structure a meaningful amount of at-risk, performance-based annual compensation Long-Term Incentive Performance-based long-term incentives: Performance-contingent RSUs Cash-settled performance units Service-based long-term incentives: Non-qualified stock options To drive the sustainable achievement of key long-term business results To align the interests of executives with stockholders To structure a meaningful amount of at-risk, performance-based long-term compensation To attract, retain, and motivate executive talent

Component(s)

Rationale for Form of Compensation

Base Salary

  Cash

  To attract and retain executive talent

  To provide a fixed base of compensation generally aligned to peer group levels

Short-Term Incentive

  Performance-based annual cash bonus

  To drive the achievement of key business results on an annual basis

  To recognize individual executives based on their specific and measurable contributions

  To structure a meaningful amount of at-risk, performance-based annual compensation

Long-Term

Incentive

  Performance-based long-term incentives:

o  Performance-contingent RSUs

o  Cash-settled performance units

  Service-based long-term incentives:

o  Non-qualified stock options

o  Restricted stock awards

  To drive the sustainable achievement of key long-term business results

  To align the interests of executives with stockholders

  To structure a meaningful amount of at-risk, performance-based long-term compensation

  To attract, retain, and motivate executive talent

Base Salary

Annual base salaries are established on the basis of market conditions at the time we hire an executive, as well as by taking into account the particular executive’s level of qualifications, experience, duties, and experience.responsibilities. The Compensation Committee reviews the base salaries of our executive officers annually, and any subsequent modifications to annual base salaries are made in consideration of the appropriateness of each executive officer’s compensation, both individually and relative to the other executive officers, the individual performance of each executive officer, changes in duties and responsibilities, and any significant changes in market conditions. We do not apply specific formulas to determine increases.

The Compensation Committee approved executive officerNEO annual base salaries for 2017, 2018,2020, 2021, and 20192022 as described in the following table. Annual base salaries arepro-rated for any partial year.

 

LOGO

Name 2017 Base Salary 2018 Base Salary 2019 Base Salary 2019 Base Salary Percentile Rank Relative to Peer Companies Peter R. Knitzer $530,000 $550,000 $600,000 43rd John D. Schachtel $350,000 $360,000 $400,000 39th Donald E. Thomas $342,000 $355,000 $400,000 28th Daniel J. Taggart $318,000 $330,000 $375,000 34th Brian J. Fisher $240,000 $300,000 $335,000 15th

Name

 

2020 Base Salary

 

 

2021 Base Salary

 

 

2022 Base Salary

 

Robert W. Beck

 

$

600,000

 

 

$

640,000

 

 

$

660,000

 

Harpreet Rana

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

420,000

 

John D. Schachtel

 

$

415,000

 

 

$

428,000

 

 

$

441,000

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

412,000

 

Manish Parmar

 

$

335,000

 

 

$

352,000

 

 

$

363,000

 

In February 2018, in recognition of his performance and service to our company, the Board promoted Mr. Fisher from Vice President to Senior Vice President and increased his base salary accordingly. At the time of the increase in 2018, Mr. Fisher’s base salary remained below the 25th percentile relative to 5th-ranked NEOs in our

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 28


peer group. In February 2019,2021, following a total compensation analysis conducted by Veritas in late 2018,2020 and early 2021, the Compensation Committee elected to increaseincreased each executive officer’s base salary in order to better align their base salaries with those paid by peer companies. Following these increases in 2019, as noted above,2021, our executive officers’ base salaries ranged between the 1514th and 4336rdth percentile relative to comparable executive officers at peer companies.

Our Compensation Committee believes that it has set base salaries at appropriate levels to attract and retain effective executives and that base salaries, when combined with short- and long-term incentives, are an important component of a holistic compensation approach.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 29


Performance-Based Annual Cash Awards

Our executive officers are eligible for performance-based annual cash awards linked to performance targets set by our Compensation Committee. Our annual incentive program is designed to drive achievement of annual corporate goals, including key financial and operating results and strategic goals that create long-term stockholder value. Our executive officers are eligible for performance-based annual cash awards linked to performance targets set by our Compensation Committee.

Components of Annual Incentive Program

The awards for 20182021 were based primarily (85%) on our performance with respect to the metrics in the following table. The metrics in the table below drive the overall performance of our business from year to year and are elements of our historical financial success.

 

LOGO

Performance Metric What it Measures Rationale for Metric Net Income from Operations Profitability Measures the effectiveness of our management team's execution of our strategic and operational plans Reflects business variables and factors that are within management's control or are influenced by decisions made by executives Average Finance Receivables Loan growth Measures our ability to grow our business We establish annual growth objectives for our management team for loans that we originate and service Net Credit Losses as a Percentage of Average Finance Receivables Loan portfolio control Measures the control our management team exerts on our loan portfolio It is ultimately a measure of the quality of underwriting policies and decisions and the effectiveness of collection efforts We guide our management team to specific aggregate net credit loss goals each year that, combined with our average finance receivables measure, attempt to balance attractive growth with effective portfolio control Total Net Debt / EBITDA Leverage ratio Measures reliance on our credit facilities to produce cash flow Holds management accountable for the responsible use of credit to fund our business Total General and Administrative Expense Percentage Expense control Measures the effectiveness with which our management team utilizes our corporate resources and minimizes our corporate expenses

Note: We calculate EBITDA as consolidated net income from operations before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation, and amortization, each as calculated in accordance with GAAP and as set forth in our audited financial statements.

What It Measures

Rationale for Metric

Net Income from Operations

Profitability

  Measures the effectiveness of our management team’s execution of our strategic and operational plans

  Reflects business variables and factors that are within management’s control or are influenced by decisions made by executives

Average Finance Receivables

Loan Portfolio Growth

  Measures our ability to grow our business

Net Credit Losses as a Percentage of Average Finance Receivables

Loan Portfolio Control

  Measures the control our management team exerts on our loan portfolio

  Ultimately a measure of the quality of underwriting policies and decisions and the effectiveness of collection efforts

  When combined with our average finance receivables measure, balances attractive growth with effective portfolio control

Return on Assets

Efficiency of

Profitability

  Measures the effectiveness of our management team’s utilization of assets to generate earnings

  Holds management accountable for growing the loan portfolio in a controlled and profitable manner

Total General and Administrative Expense as a Percentage of Total Revenue

Expense Control

  Measures the effectiveness with which our management team utilizes our corporate resources and minimizes our corporate expenses

Our 20182021 annual incentive awards were based to a lesser extent (15%), on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its short-term strategic objectives.objectives, which are consistent with our Board-approved financial and business plans for the Company. In light of ongoing, significant strategic projects and initiatives, our Compensation Committee believes that it is important to

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 29


appropriately incentivize the achievement of strategic objectives (which often cannot be measured quantitatively) by linking their achievement (and the quality thereof) to our executives’ compensation.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 30


2021 Annual Incentive Program Performance Targets, Results, and Payouts

TheFor 2021, the following table provides for 2018 detail regarding the threshold and target levels of performance set by the Compensation Committee for each performance metric, the weighting applied to each metric, our actual annual performance pursuant to each metric, and the percentage payout for each metric and in total. AFor each metric, as in prior years, a threshold level of performance must behave been exceeded in order to earn any award, and each executive is eligible to earn up to 150% of his or her target award based upon the achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee.

 

LOGO

Performance Metric Threshold Performance Target Performance Maximum Performance Actual Performance Percentage Weight Percentage Payout Net Income from Operations $27,335,077 $39,050,110 $46,860,132 $35,344,473 30.0% 29.0% Average Finance Receivables $769,489,639 $854,988,487 $940,487,336 $857,906,704 20.0% 20.3% Net Credit Losses Percentage 9.99% 8.69% 7.39% 9.05% 15.0% 12.8% Total Debt / EBITDA 7.60x 6.34x 5.07x 6.99x 10.0% 8.6% Total G&A Expense Percentage 49.88% 46.40% 42.92% 45.74% 10.0% 11.0% Achievement of Strategic Objectives N/A N/A N/A N/A 15.0% 18.0% 100.0% 99.7%

In calculating the percentage payout above, the Compensation Committee adjusted actual results to account for the impact of Hurricane Florence, which was beyond the reasonable control of management. Had the Compensation Committee not made an adjustment, the total percentage payout would have instead been 94.9% of target. The Compensation Committee believes that its decision to adjust actual results in 2018 is appropriately balanced against its decision in the prior year to adjust actual results in a manner that caused the percentage payout under the 2017 annual incentive program to be less than it otherwise would have been in the absence of such adjustments. Additional information regarding the estimated impact of Hurricane Florence on our results of operations, including our net income and net credit losses, may be found in our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Performance Metric

 

Threshold

Performance

 

 

Target

Performance

 

 

Maximum

Performance

 

 

Actual

Performance

 

 

Percentage

Weight

 

 

Percentage

Payout

 

Net Income from Operations

 

$

32,008,016

 

 

$

45,725,738

 

 

$

54,870,885

 

 

$

88,687,201

 

 

25.0%

 

 

37.5%

 

Return on Assets

 

2.60%

 

 

3.71%

 

 

4.40%

 

 

7.24%

 

 

20.0%

 

 

30.0%

 

Average Finance Receivables

 

$

821,132,537

 

 

$

1,173,046,481

 

 

$

1,407,655,777

 

 

$

1,213,882,958

 

 

15.0%

 

 

17.6%

 

Net Credit Losses

 

6.50%

 

 

9.24%

 

 

11.10%

 

 

6.57%

 

 

15.0%

 

 

22.5%

 

G&A Expense Percentage (Revenue)

 

33.70%

 

 

48.13%

 

 

57.80%

 

 

45.64%

 

 

10.0%

 

 

13.5%

 

Qualitative Component

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

 

15.0%

 

 

21.0%

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0%

 

 

142.1%

 

As described above, 15% of the total annual incentive program award opportunity is linked to our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its short-term strategic objectives. For 2018,2021, our Compensation Committee elected to pay 120%140% of this award opportunity in recognitionlight of, our company’s outstanding execution of its short-term strategic objectives, includingamong other things, the development of custom credit scorecards, the closing of our first two ABS transactions in June 2018 and December 2018, the expansion of our branch footprint to two new states, the completionmanagement team’s continued successful navigation of the implementation ofCOVID-19 pandemic, significant improvements made to our new loan origination and servicing platform in each of our branches, and thetechnology infrastructure, continued improvementsstrong execution on funding initiatives, advancements in our managementdiversity, equity, and inclusion programs, maintenance of enterprise risks.strong internal controls, and progress on our digital initiatives.

Target annual incentive levels and actual performance-based annual cash awards for each of our NEOs for 20182021 are detailed below, based upon the 99.7%142.1% performance achievement detailed above.

LOGO

Name 2018 Eligible Base Salary 2018 Target Award as % of Salary Target Award Actual Award Peter R. Knitzer $550,000 100% $550,000 $548,350 John D. Schachtel $360,000 100% $360,000 $358,920 Donald E. Thomas $355,000 100% $355,000 $353,935 Daniel J. Taggart $330,000 100% $330,000 $329,010 Brian J. Fisher $300,000 100% $300,000 $299,100

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 30

Name

 

2021 Eligible

Base Salary

 

 

2021 Target Award

as % of Salary

 

 

Target Award

 

 

Actual Award

 

Robert W. Beck

 

$

640,000

 

 

150%

 

 

$

960,000

 

 

$

1,364,160

 

Harpreet Rana

 

$

400,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

568,400

 

John D. Schachtel

 

$

428,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

428,000

 

 

$

608,188

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

$

400,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

568,400

 

Manish Parmar

 

$

352,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

352,000

 

 

$

500,192

 


The target award percentages described above were determined by the Compensation Committee and are calibrated so that the total compensation opportunity for each executive officer is commensurate with that executive’s role and responsibilities with us. Except in the case of Mr. Thomas, ifIf an executive voluntarily terminates his or her employment during the performance year, he becomesor she generally is ineligible to receive payment of a performance-based annual cash award. Pursuant to his retirement agreement, Mr. Thomas will be eligible to receive apro-rated, performance-based annual cash award based upon the number of days of service in 2019, subject to our achievement of the performance goals established by the Compensation Committee for 2019. See “Summary of Employment Arrangements with Executive Officers – Retirement Agreement with Chief Financial Officer.”

Annual Incentive Program Opportunities in 20192022

OurIn March 2022, our Compensation Committee has not yet acted to establishdetermined that the parameters of our2022 annual incentive program for 2019. However, we currently expect that it willwould be structuredidentical in a manner similarstructure to the 20182021 program provided that our Compensation Committee is considering there-allocation of the weighting of certain of the metrics and the replacement of the “Total Debt / EBITDA” performance metric with a metric that instead measures our return on assets. We further expect that the target 2019described above. Target 2022 incentive levels for each of our executive officers will be set at 150% of base salaryNEOs, as established by our Compensation Committee, are described in the case of Mr. Knitzer and 100% of base salary in the case of each other executive officer.table below.

Name

 

2022

Base Salary

 

 

2022 Target Award

as % of Salary

 

 

2022 Target

Award

 

Robert W. Beck

 

$

660,000

 

 

150%

 

 

$

990,000

 

Harpreet Rana

 

$

420,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

420,000

 

John D. Schachtel

 

$

441,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

441,000

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

$

412,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

412,000

 

Manish Parmar

 

$

363,000

 

 

100%

 

 

$

363,000

 

Our Compensation Committee believes that ourCommittee’s goal is to implement a short-term incentive program that is effective in motivating our executives to achieve short-term financial and operational objectives, in furtherance of ourpay-for-performance compensation strategy.strategy and our long-term strategic plans.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 31


Long-Term Incentive Awards

Our long-term incentive award grants are intended to directly align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, to give our executive officers a strong incentive to maximize stockholder returns on a long-term basis, and to aid in our recruitment and retention of key executive talent necessary to ensure our continued success.

Components of 2021 Long-Term Incentive Program

In 2016 through 2018,2021, our long-term incentive program provided for the delivery of long-term incentive awards through a combination of threethe following four award vehicles:(i) non-qualified stock options, (ii) performance-contingent RSUs, and (iii) cash-settled performance units. Vesting of each of the performance-contingent awards is subject to, among other things, the achievement of performance objectives over a three-year performance period that begins on January 1st of the grant year. Long-term incentive awards are scheduled to occur in the first quarter of each year.

In 2018, as part of the long-term incentive program, we granted the following awards in the first quarter of 2018 to Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart, Fisher, and other key employees:

LOGO

LTI Vehicle Principal Performance Metric Performance Period Weighting Recipients Non-Qualified Stock Options Built-in metric of stock price growth N/A – Options vest in equal installments on December 31, 2018, 2019, and 2020, subject to continued employment One-third of total target award Executive officers and several other key C-suite employees Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock Units CAGR of net income compared to a peer group Three years, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 One-third of total target award Executive officers and several other key C-suite employees Cash-Settled Performance Units CAGR of basic earnings per share compared to a peer group Three years, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 One-third of total target award Executive officers and several other key C-suite employees

LTI Vehicle

Performance Period

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting |

Weighting

Performance-Contingent

Restricted Stock Units

A three-year performance period beginning January 1st of the grant year

Approximately one-fourth of total target award

Cash-Settled Performance Units

A three-year performance period beginning January 1st of the grant year

Approximately one-fourth of total target award

Non-Qualified Stock Options

N/A – Options vest in three equal annual installments beginning on December 31st of the grant year, subject to continued employment

Approximately one-fourth of total target award

Restricted Stock Awards

N/A – Shares vest in three equal annual installments beginning on December 31st of the grant year, subject to continued employment

Approximately one-fourth of total target award


VestingIn years prior to 2020, vesting of the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units iswas based primarily (90%) uponon our CAGRs of net income (in the case of the performance-contingent RSUs) and basic earnings per share (in the case of the cash-settled performance over the three-year performance periodunits) compared to our peer group over the three-year performance period. In January 2020, we adopted current expected credit loss (“CECL”) accounting, as described inrequired by the table below. FailureFASB’s Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This accounting update significantly changes the impairment model for estimating credit losses on financial assets, requiring earlier recognition of and provisioning for credit losses as compared to meet the threshold level of performance results in the forfeitureprior approach. The impacts of the associated award.new accounting standard on the financial results of the companies in our peer group vary widely, including because some peer companies are not lenders and therefore were not materially impacted by the new standard.

LOGO

LTI Vehicle Principal Performance Metric Performance Level Required Performance %Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Target Award EarnedStockholders | 32


In order to eliminate the variability caused by the new CECL accounting standard in comparing our results to peer company results during the performance period, the Compensation Committee determined to evaluate performance of all companies on a pre-provision basis. As a result, vesting of performance-contingent RSUs and Vested Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock Units CAGRcash-settled performance units having performance periods ending in 2020 and beyond is now based primarily (90%) on our CAGRs of pre-provision net income (in the case of the performance-contingent RSUs) and pre-provision basic earnings per share (in the case of the cash-settled performance units) compared to our peer group over the three-year performance period. We sometimes refer to this portion of the performance-contingent RSU and cash-settled performance unit award opportunities as the “Objective Criteria Units” in this Proxy Statement. Pre-provision net income is defined as net income excluding the impact of the change in the allowance for credit losses but including the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 Threshold Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 50th Percentile 50% Target Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 60th Percentile 100% Maximum Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 75th Percentile 150% Cash-Settled Performance Units CAGRimpact of recognized net credit losses, and pre-provision basic earnings per share comparedis defined as pre-provision net income divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding during the performance period. Vesting of each award is dependent upon meeting a threshold level of performance, and participants are eligible to earn up to 150% of their target award:

LTI Vehicle

Principal

Performance Metric

Performance Level

Required Performance

% of Target Award Earned and Vested

Performance-Contingent Restricted Stock Units

CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group during the three-year performance period

Threshold Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 50th Percentile

50%

Target Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 60th Percentile

100%

Maximum Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 75th Percentile

150%

Cash-Settled Performance Units

CAGR of pre-provision basic earnings per share compared to our peer group during the three-year performance period

Threshold Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 50th Percentile

50%

Target Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 60th Percentile

100%

Maximum Performance

Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 75th Percentile

150%

__________

Note: The percentage of the Objective Criteria Units vested for results between the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020 Threshold Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance atperformance levels stated above is calculated using linear interpolation.

In addition to the 50th Percentile 50% Target Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 60th Percentile 100% Maximum Performance Meets or Exceeds Peer Group Performance at the 75th Percentile 150%

To a lesser extent (10%),Objective Criteria Units, vesting of the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units is based in small part (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives overindividual and company-wide goals during the same performance period. We sometimes refer to this portion of the performance-contingent RSU and cash-settled performance unit award opportunities as the “Qualitative Criteria Units” in this Proxy Statement. The Qualitative Criteria Units allow our Compensation Committee to incentivize and make our executives’ pay in part contingent on the achievement of strategic goals that may be difficult to quantify.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 33


Components of 2022 Long-Term Incentive Program

In light2022, our Compensation Committee, in consultation with FW Cook, conducted a review of ongoing, significant strategic projectsthe design of our long-term incentive program. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee determined to adopt a new, simplified long-term incentive program for our executive officers. Similar to the 2021 long-term incentive program, the design of the 2022 program is intended to directly align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, to give our executive officers a strong incentive to maximize stockholder returns on a long-term basis, and initiatives,to aid in our recruitment and retention of key executive talent necessary to ensure our continued success.

In 2022, our long-term incentive program provides for the delivery of long-term incentive awards through a combination of the following two award vehicles:

LTI Vehicle

Performance Period

Weighting

Performance

Restricted Stock Units

A three-year performance period beginning February 17, 2022 and ending December 31, 2024

Approximately one-half of total target award

Restricted Stock Awards

N/A – Shares vest in three equal annual installments beginning on December 31st of the grant year, subject to continued employment

Approximately one-half of total target award

The performance restricted stock unit (“PRSU”) award is the new element of our long-term incentive program, and it is the performance-contingent award which replaced the performance-contingent restricted stock unit award and the cash-settled performance units. The PRSU award rewards executives for total shareholder return to stockholders through the Company’s stock price appreciation and declared dividends. We use absolute cumulative total shareholder return as the principal performance metric for the award because the Compensation Committee believes it is important to appropriately incentivize the achievement of strategic objectives (which often cannot be measured quantitatively) by linking their achievement (and the quality thereof) to our executives’ compensation.

Mr. Schachtel became our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer effective as of May 30, 2017. Mr. Schachtel’s employment agreement establishes his aggregate long-term incentive compensation opportunity level for 2017 and 2018, and provides that he will be granted long-term incentive award opportunities through a combinationultimate measure of the threeCompany’s achievement for its stockholders over the long term. The PRSUs have both upside and downside potential based on positive or negative cumulative total shareholder return performance. Vesting of the PRSU award vehicles describedabove—non-qualified stock options, performance-contingent RSUs, and cash-settled performance units. The aggregate grant date target value of Mr. Schachtel’s 2017 and 2018 long-term incentive compensation opportunities is $850,000 (calculated as approximately $525,000 per year on an annualized basis foroccurs at the period commencing on Mr. Schachtel’s first day of employment, May 30, 2017, through the end of 2018).

Mr. Schachtel’s long-term incentive compensation for 2017 and 2018 is split amongnon-qualified stock options, performance-contingent RSUs, and cash-settled performance units having a grant date target value of $300,000, $275,000, and $275,000, respectively. Because Mr. Schachtel’s employment commenced more than 90 days after the beginning of the performance period, associated with the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units that we granted under our 2017 long-term incentive program, Mr. Schachtel’s participation in the 2017 program with respect to performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units would have resulted in the payment of compensation (if any) that would not have qualifiedwhich is December 31, 2024 for the performance-based compensation exemption available pursuant2022 awards, and vested PRSUs are subject to Code Section 162(m). Therefore, in an effort to preserve, toadditional one-year holding period following the extent practicable, the future tax deductibility of Mr. Schachtel’s compensation, the Compensation Committee approved Mr. Schachtel’snon-qualified stock option award withvesting date. Vesting is dependent upon meeting a grant date of May 30, 2017, the date he commenced employment, and determined that the award of Mr. Schachtel’s performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units should occur as part of the 2018 long-term incentive program.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 32


Long-Term Incentive Awards in 2018 and 2019

The grant date target values for awards granted to our NEOs in 2018 are detailed in the following table. For the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units, athree-year threshold level of performance must be exceeded for the awards to have any value,absolute cumulative total shareholder return, and participants are eligible to earn up to 150% of their target award based uponaward. For example, if at the achievementend of the three-year performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. For thenon-qualified stock options,period, our stock price must exceed(calculated based on the exercise price (which is set at our closing20-day trading average through the vesting date) plus the value of reinvested dividends paid has increased by 15% from the 20-day trading average stock price onthrough the grant date)date, then payout will be the target number of PRSUs granted (“Target Performance”). If cumulative total shareholder return has increased by 72.5%, the number of units earned will be 150% of the number of units granted (“Maximum Performance”). Conversely, if cumulative total shareholder return has declined by 42.5%, then just 50% of the granted units will vest (“Threshold Performance”). No PRSUs will be earned by executive officers if the cumulative total shareholder return at the end of the three-year performance period is below the Threshold Performance level, and executive officers cannot earn more than 150% of the number of units granted if performance exceeds the Maximum Performance level. The following table reflects potential performance and payout percentages. Performance between these points will be linearly interpolated.

 

 

Performance

 

 

Payout

 

Performance Level

 

TSR Above Target

 

 

Absolute TSR

 

 

Shares Earned

 

 

Value Delivered(1)

 

Maximum

 

+50.0%

 

 

+72.5%

 

 

150%

 

 

259%

 

 

 

+25.0%

 

 

+43.8%

 

 

125%

 

 

180%

 

Target

 

0.0%

 

 

+15.0%

 

 

100%

 

 

115%

 

 

 

(13.0%)

 

 

0.0%

 

 

87%

 

 

87%

 

Threshold

 

(50.0%)

 

 

(42.5%)

 

 

50%

 

 

29%

 

 

 

<(50.0%)

 

 

<(42.5%)

 

 

0%

 

 

0%

 

__________

(1)

Assumes PRSUs have an accounting value equal to the share price at grant.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 34


2019 Long-Term Incentive Program Performance Results and Payouts

In 2019, we granted our then-current executive officers long-term incentive awards pursuant to the options to have any value.

LOGO

Name 2018 Target Grant Date Value Total Performance-Contingent RSUs Cash-Settled Performance Units Non-Qualified Stock Options Peter R. Knitzer $2,200,000 $733,333 $733,333 $733,334 John D.program described above. Messrs. Schachtel $550,000 $275,000 $275,000 N/A Donald E. Thomas $532,500 $177,500 $177,500 $177,500 Daniel J. Taggart $330,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 Brian J.and Fisher $300,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000

Ourwere employed by us in 2019 and participated in the 2019 long-term incentive program. The three-year performance period established under the 2019 long-term incentive program ended on December 31, 2021. Our CAGRs of pre-provision net income and pre-provision earnings per share compared to our peer group over the performance period were as follows:

Performance Measure

 

Performance at

25th Percentile

of Peer Group

 

Performance at

50th Percentile

of Peer Group

 

Performance at

75th Percentile

of Peer Group

 

Performance

of Regional

CAGR of Pre-Provision Net Income

 

(2.6%)

 

30.0%

 

41.9%

 

31.1%

CAGR of Pre-Provision Basic EPS

 

(2.5%)

 

27.3%

 

43.9%

 

37.9%

Our performance at the above levels resulted in 2019 is structured in a manner similar to the 2018 program described above, subject to certain exceptions. For 2019, in consultationvesting of 89.5% of the Objective Criteria Units associated with Veritasthe performance-contingent RSU awards and following a review110.5% of the Objective Criteria Units associated with the cash-settled performance unit awards. In calculating the performance of peer companies, the Compensation Committee excluded discontinued operations and utilized pro-forma financial statements filed by any peer company practices,having made a significant acquisition, in each case as disclosed by the peer companies in their public filings.

For Mr. Schachtel and Mr. Fisher, our Compensation Committee elected to add a service-based RSA as a fourth componentpay 150% of the Qualitative Criteria Units in recognition of achievements during the three-year performance period, including the continued customization of the loan origination and servicing platform, including for electronic payments and the online customer portal; the development and completion of custom credit scorecards for marketing and branch underwriting; material improvements in our liquidity profile; the return of capital to our stockholders, including through the initiation of a recurring dividend program; the expansion of our branch footprint to new states; improvements to our compliance management system and enterprise risk management; the introduction of several talent development initiatives, including company-wide district training branches; the successful planning and implementation of our transition to the new CECL accounting standard; and those 2021 achievements outlined in “Performance-Based Annual Cash Awards — 2021 Annual Incentive Program Performance Targets, Results, and Payouts” above.

Based upon the above results, in April 2022, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher vested in and earned 95.6% of their total target performance-contingent RSUs and 114.5% of their total target cash-settled performance units under the 2019 long-term incentive program. Since the development of our performance-based long-term incentive program in order to strengthen the retentive nature of the program and to more appropriately balance the allocation of long-term incentive award opportunities between performance-based and service-based awards. The service-based RSA will vest in three equal annual tranches over a three-year period, subject to continued employment through the respective vesting dates. In addition, for 2019,2014, the Compensation Committee did not grant anybelieves that the results have been appropriately punitive during times of poor performance and appropriately rewarding during times of strong performance. The following table provides information regarding the percentage of the target performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units vested under our long-term incentive programs since 2014 for our NEOs:

Long-Term Incentive Program

Award Component

 

2014

Grant Year

 

2015

Grant Year

 

2016

Grant Year

 

2017

Grant Year

 

2018

Grant Year

 

2019

Grant Year

 

6-Year

Average

Performance-Contingent RSUs

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

116.5%

 

96.6%

 

105.6%

 

95.6%

 

69.1%

Cash-Settled Performance Units

 

0.0%

 

0.0%

 

116.5%

 

126.6%

 

105.6%

 

114.5%

 

77.2%

__________

Note: The table presents weighted-average results for each grant year based on each executive’s target and earned award values.  

Our Compensation Committee believes that vesting at these levels appropriately reflects our operational and financial results over the relevant periods, validates our pay-for-performance strategy, and is supported by our total stockholder return.

Long-Term Incentive Awards in 2021

Consistent with the parameters of our long-term incentive program described above, we granted the following awards to Mr. Thomasour NEOs in light2021:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 Target Grant Date Value

 

Name

 

Total

 

 

Performance-

Contingent RSUs

 

 

Cash-Settled

Performance Units

 

 

Non-Qualified

Stock Options

 

 

Restricted

Stock

 

Robert W. Beck

 

$

2,240,000

 

 

$

560,000

 

 

$

560,000

 

 

$

560,000

 

 

$

560,000

 

Harpreet Rana

 

$

332,500

 

 

$

166,250

 

 

$

166,250

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

John D. Schachtel

 

$

642,000

 

 

$

160,500

 

 

$

160,500

 

 

$

160,500

 

 

$

160,500

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

$

600,000

 

 

$

150,000

 

 

$

150,000

 

 

$

150,000

 

 

$150,000

 

Manish Parmar

 

$

528,000

 

 

$

132,000

 

 

$

132,000

 

 

$

132,000

 

 

$

132,000

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of his pending retirement, consistent with the terms of his retirement agreement. Finally, in October 2018, in recognition of his performance and service to our company, the Board promoted Mr. Taggart from Senior Vice President to Executive Vice President and increased his long-term incentive award opportunity accordingly.Stockholders | 35


 

LOGO

Name 2019 Target Grant Date Value Total Performance-Contingent RSUs Cash-Settled Performance Units Non-Qualified Stock Options Restricted Stock Peter R. Knitzer $2,100,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 $525,000 John D. Schachtel $600,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Donald E. Thomas N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Daniel J. Taggart $662,500 $140,625 $140,625 $190,625 $190,625 Brian J. Fisher $435,000 $83,750 $83,750 $133,750 $133,750

Note: The number of shares subject to the performance-contingent RSU awards and the RSAs is determined by dividing the value of the award by the closing price per share of common stock on the grant date (rounded down to the nearest whole share). The number of shares subject to thenon-qualified stock option awards is determined by dividing the value of the award by the fair value per share of common stock on the grant date calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model (rounded down to the nearest whole share). Ms. Rana did not receive an RSA or non-qualified stock option award in 2021 because she received an RSA and a non-qualified stock option award when she joined the Company in November 2020. Ms. Rana’s 2020 RSA and non-qualified stock option award vest on the same schedule as the 2021 awards granted to all NEOs.

Long-Term Incentive Awards in 2022

Consistent with the parameters of our newly established 2022 long-term incentive program described above, we granted the following awards to our NEOs in 2022:

 

 

 

 

 

 

2022 Target Grant Date Value

 

Name

 

Total

 

 

Performance RSUs

 

 

Restricted

Stock

 

Robert W. Beck

 

$

3,000,000

 

 

$

1,500,000

 

 

$

1,500,000

 

Harpreet Rana

 

$

800,000

 

 

$

400,000

 

 

$

400,000

 

John D. Schachtel

 

$

825,000

 

 

$

412,500

 

 

$

412,500

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

$

675,000

 

 

$

337,500

 

 

$

337,500

 

Manish Parmar

 

$

545,000

 

 

$

272,500

 

 

$

272,500

 

__________

Note:  The number of shares subject to the performance-contingent PRSU awards is determined by dividing the value of the award by the fair value of each PRSU, calculated on or as close in time as practicable to the grant date of the award using a 20-day average stock price and a Monte Carlo valuation model. The number of shares subject to the RSAs is determined by dividing the value of the award by the closing price per share of common stock on the grant date (rounded down to the nearest whole share).

Our Compensation Committee believes that our long-term incentive program furthers ourpay-for-performance objectives, creates a compelling recruitment and retention tool, appropriately focuses our executives on the achievement of long-term financial and business goals, and strengthens the alignment of our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 33


2016 Long-Term Incentive Program Performance Targets, Results, and Payouts

In 2016, we granted our then-current executive officersnon-qualified stock options, performance-contingent RSUs, and cash-settled performance units. Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher were employed by us in 2016 and participated in the 2016 long-term incentive program. The three-year performance period established under the 2016 long-term incentive program ended on December 31, 2018.

Vesting of the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units granted in 2016 was based primarily (90%) on our CAGRs of net income (in the case of the performance-contingent RSUs) and basic earnings per share (in the case of the cash-settled performance units) compared to our 2016 peer group over the three-year performance period. We refer to this portion of the performance-contingent RSU and cash-settled performance unit award opportunities as the “Objective Criteria Units.” The Objective Criteria Units were eligible to vest based on our performance relative to our peer group as follows:

LOGO

Performance Relative to Peer Group % of Objective Criteria Units Vested < 50th Percentile 0% 50th Percentile 50% 60th Percentile 100% ³ 75th Percentile 150%

The percentage of the Objective Criteria Units vested for results between the performance levels stated above is calculated using linear interpolation. Our CAGRs of net income and earnings per share compared to our peer group over the performance period were as follows:

LOGO

Performance Measure Performance at 25th Percentile of Peer Group Performance at 50th Percentile of Peer Group Performance at 75th Percentile of Peer Group Performance of Regional CAGR of Net Income (50.7%) 12.9% 31.8% 17.8% CAGR of Basic EPS (49.4%) 12.2% 35.3% 21.7%

In calculating the performance of peer companies, the Compensation Committee excluded discontinued operations, adjusted for the impact of goodwill impairments, and utilizedpro-forma financial statements filed by any peer company having made a significant acquisition, in each case as disclosed by the peer companies in their SEC filings. Where a peer company was delisted following poor financial performance, the peer company was ranked at the bottom of the peer group. Where a peer company was acquired by another peer company, the acquired company was removed from the peer group, and where a peer company was acquired by a company outside of the peer group, the acquired company’s CAGRs of net income and basic earnings per share were calculated using available information. Our Compensation Committee also elected to remove one peer company from the peer group analysis due to its significant governance failures and financial statement restatements during the performance period, as well as its ongoing material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the performance period, all of which called into question the quality and accuracy of the company’s reported earnings. Finally, in calculating peer company performance and our performance, the Compensation Committee adjusted actual results to account for the impact of hurricane events.

Our performance at the above levels resulted in the vesting of 116.7% of the Objective Criteria Units associated with each of the performance-contingent RSU awards and the cash-settled performance unit awards. Our Compensation Committee believes that vesting at these levels appropriately reflects ourpay-for-performance strategy and is supported by our total shareholder return. Over the three-year performance period, we finished in the same position within our peer group in each of total shareholder return, CAGR of net income, and CAGR of basic earnings per share.

Vesting of the performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units granted in 2016 was also based in small part (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives between 2016 and 2018. We refer to this portion of the performance-contingent RSU and cash-settled performance unit award opportunities as the “Qualitative Criteria

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 34


Units.” Our Compensation Committee elected to pay 115% of the Qualitative Criteria Units in recognition of, among other achievements, the implementation of our new loan origination and servicing platform in each of our branches; the development of custom credit scorecards; material improvements in our liquidity profile, including through a $100 million increase in capacity under our senior revolving credit facility, the closing of a $125 million revolving warehouse credit facility, and the closing of our first two ABS transactions; the expansion of our branch footprint to two new states; improvements to our compliance management system and enterprise risk management; and the full dismissal in 2018 of the securities class action lawsuit filed against us in 2014.

Based upon the above results, in March 2019, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher vested in and earned 116.5% of their total target performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units under the 2016 long-term incentive program. The following table provides information regarding the percentage of the target performance-contingent RSUs and cash-settled performance units vested under our 2014, 2015, and 2016 long-term incentive programs, which were eligible to vest on December 31st of 2016, 2017, and 2018, respectively:

LOGO

Long-Term Incentive Program Award Component 2014 Grant Year 2015 Grant Year 2016 Grant Year Performance-Contingent RSUs 0% 0% 116.5% Cash-Settled Performance Units 0% 0% 116.5%

Key Employee Retention Program

In 2014, even when including the increased target value of the short- and long-term incentive awards, total compensation levels for our executive officers were below the median of our peer group. Further, the difficulties we faced in 2014 resulted in a significant deficit in terms of realized compensation. As a result, in 2015, our Compensation Committee, in consultation with Veritas, determined to implement a key employee retention program as an incentive and retention vehicle for certain critical executives.

Pursuant to the key employee retention program, the Compensation Committee granted the following awards to certain executive officers in 2015:(i) non-qualified stock options, which are subject to the terms of the Regional Management Corp. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2011 Plan”), and (ii) a cash retention award. In March 2016, the Compensation Committee elected to continue the key employee retention program with grants of the following awards to certain executive officers: (i) RSAs, which are subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan, and (ii) cash retention awards.

We did not grant any retention awards to our executive officers in 2017 or 2018.

Perquisites

We also provide various other limited perquisites and other personal benefits to our executive officers that are intended to be part of a competitive compensation program. For 2018,2021, these benefits included:

The ability to participate in a comprehensive voluntary annual health screening;

Monthly automobile allowance of $1,150 to Mr. Thomas;

Payment of Mr. Knitzer’stravel expenses on behalf of Ms. Rana and Mr. Schachtel’sSchachtel for travel expenses to and from theirout-of-state personal residences;

Mobile phone allowance payments to Messrs. Knitzer,Beck, Schachtel, Thomas, and Taggart;Parmar; and

Payment of supplemental long-term disability premiums, and associated taxes, which is intended, in part, to insure against our severance obligations in the event of a disability termination event under an executive’s employment agreement.

We also offer our executive officers benefits that are generally available to all of our employees, including 401(k) plan matching contributions, health insurance, disability insurance, dental insurance, vision insurance, life insurance, paid time off, and the reimbursement of qualified business expenses. The Compensation Committee believes that these benefits are comparable to those offered by other companies that compete with us for executive talent and are consistent with our overall compensation program. Perquisites are not a material part of our compensation program.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 36

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 35



Other Compensation Policies,Policies, Practices, and Matters

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

The Compensation Committee believes that significant ownership of common stock by our executives and directors directly aligns their interests with those of our stockholders and also helps to balance the incentives for risk-taking inherent in equity-based awards made to executives. Under our Stock Ownership and Retention Policy, executives and directors are subject to the following ownership guidelines:

 

Covered Person

Ownership Guideline

Chief Executive Officer

5x annual base salary

Other covered employees (including NEOs)

2x annual base salary

Directors

5x annual cash retainer

LOGO

Covered Person Ownership Guideline Chief Executive Officer 5x annual base salary Other covered employees (including NEOs) 2x annual base salary Directors 5x annual cash retainer

In February 2018, our Compensation Committee increased our director stock ownership requirement from 3x to 5x the annual cash retainer, placing the dollar value of the ownership requirement in the 90th percentile of our peer group. Persons covered by the policy are expected to utilize grants under equity compensation plans to reach the levels of ownership expected by the policy. For purposes of determining whether an individual covered by the policy has satisfied the stock ownership requirements of the policy, eligible equity includes shares of our common stock: (i) owned by the covered individual (including but not limited to stock purchased on the open market), (ii) owned jointly with the covered individual’s spouse and/or dependent children, (iii) owned by the covered individual’s spouse and/or dependent children, (iv) held by a covered individual in a 401(k) plan, if any, (v) purchased under an employee stock purchase plan maintained by the Company, if any, (vi) held in individual brokerage accounts or other custodial accounts or in trust for the benefit of the covered individual or the covered individual’s spouse and/or dependent children, whether acquired through open market purchase or otherwise, (vii) underlying time-based restricted stock, restricted stock units, or similar awards (whether vested or unvested), (viii) subject to vested/earned performance shares, performance units, other performance awards, other stock-based awards, or similar vested/earned awards, and (ix) received upon the exercise of stock options or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”).  Eligible equity does not include shares of our common stock: (i) subject to options or SARs or (ii) subject to unvested/unearned performance shares, performance units, or similar awards.

The policy also incorporates a retention element requiring such persons to retain 50% of the net shares resulting from the vesting or exercise of equity awards to obtainfor a minimum of 12 months following the requiredapplicable vesting or earning date and until the applicable stock ownership under the policy.guidelines are met. As of December 31, 2021, all directors and covered employees were in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.

Clawback Policy

We have also adopted a Compensation Recoupment Policy, or “clawback policy.” Under the clawback policy, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Accounting Officer, any other person who is an executive officer, the Chief Accounting Officer, and such other persons as may be determined by the Board or the Compensation Committee, may be required to return to us and/or forfeit all or a portion of any cash-based incentive compensation and/or equity-based incentive compensation received by such covered person.

Such a return or forfeit is required, unless the Compensation Committee determines otherwise, if (i) compensation is received based on financial statements that are subsequently restated in a way that would decrease the amount of the award to which such person was entitled, and the restatement is based in whole or in part on the misconduct of the covered person, (ii) such compensation was received by the covered person and the Compensation Committee determines that such person has violated anon-competition,non-solicitation, confidentiality, or other restrictive covenant applicable to such person, or (iii) recoupment is otherwise required under applicable law.

Prohibition Against Hedging and Pledging

As stated in our Code of Conduct, directors, officers, employees, and their designees may not engage in activities that are designed to profit from trading activity or hedge against decreases in the value of our securities. This includes holding securities in a margin account or pledging securities as collateral for a loan or other obligation and purchasing any financial instrument or contract, including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange traded funds, which is designed to hedge or offset any risk of decrease in the market value of our common stock. These prohibitions apply regardless of whether the equity securities have been granted to the directors, executive officers, or other employees as part of their compensation or are held, directly or indirectly, by such persons or their designees.

In addition, pursuant to our Stock Ownership and Retention Policy, shares subject to the retention requirements of the policy may not be pledged, hypothecated, or made subject to execution, attachment, or similar process.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 37


No Excise TaxGross-Ups

We did not provide any of our executive officers with a“gross-up” “gross-up” or other reimbursement payment for any tax liability that he might owe as a result of the application of Code Sections 280G, 4999, or 409A during 2018,2021, and we have not agreed and are not otherwise obligated to provide any NEO with such a“gross-up” “gross-up” or other reimbursement.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 36


Deductibility of Executive Compensation

Code Section 162(m) generally limits our ability to deduct for tax purposes compensation over $1,000,000 to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, or any one of our other three highest paid executive officers. However, in the case of tax years commencing before 2018, Code Section 162(m) exempted qualifying performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if certain requirements were met. Code Section 162(m) was amended in December 2017 by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to eliminate the exemption for performance-based compensation (other than with respect to payments made pursuant to certain “grandfathered” arrangements entered into prior to November 2, 2017 that are not materially modified after that date and that would otherwise have been deductible under Code Section 162(m) prior to the changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act) and to expand the group of current and former executive officers who may be covered by the deduction limit under Code Section 162(m). As a result, compensation paid to certain of our executive officers in excess of $1,000,000 will no longer be deductible (other than potentially with respect to certain “grandfathered” arrangements, as noted above). Notwithstanding the elimination of the exemption for performance-based compensation, because of the importance of linking pay and performance, our 2018 and 2019as a matter of corporate governance best practices, our executive compensation programs continueprogram continues to impose performance conditions on a significant portion of awards to our executive officers.

The Compensation Committee will review and consider the deductibility of executive compensation under Code Section 162(m) and may authorize certain payments that will be in excess of the $1,000,000 limitation. The Compensation Committee believes that it needs to balance the benefits of designing awards that aretax-deductible with the need to design awards that attract, retain, and reward executives responsible for our success. While mindful of the benefit to us of the full deductibility of compensation, the Compensation Committee believes that it should not be constrained by the requirements of Code Section 162(m) where those requirements wouldmay impair flexibility in compensating our executive officers in a manner that can best promote our corporate objectives, which the Compensation Committee believes aligns our executive officers’ interests with our stockholders’ interests, and thus is in the best interests of our stockholders.

Payments Upon Termination andChange-in-Control

Pursuant to the terms of each of their employment agreements and certain long-term incentive award agreements, our NEOs, are entitled to certain benefits upon the termination of their employment with us, the terms of which are described below under “Summary of Employment Arrangements with Named Executive Officers.”

Risk Assessment of Compensation Policies and Practices

We have assessed our compensation programs for all employees and have concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. We believe that our compensation programs reflect an appropriate mix of compensation elements and balance current and long-term performance objectives, cash and equity compensation, and risks and rewards. During 2018,2021, the Compensation Committee reviewed our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including our NEOs, particularly as they relate to risk management practices and risk-taking incentives. As part of its review, the Compensation Committee discussed with management the ways in which risk is effectively managed or mitigated as it relates to our compensation programs and policies.

Based on this review, the Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk but instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable value creation. The following features of our executive compensation program illustrate this point.

Compensation Committee Oversight. Our executive compensation programs are regularly reviewed and overseen by an independent Compensation Committee that retains the discretion to reduce compensation based on corporate and individual performance and other factors.

Review by Independent Compensation Consultant. Our executive compensation programs have been designed and reviewed by an independent compensation consultant.

Mix of Incentives. Our compensation programs provide an appropriate mix of short-term and long-term incentives, as well as cash and equity opportunities.

Compensation Committee Oversight. Our executive compensation programs are regularly reviewed and overseen by an independent Compensation Committee that retains the discretion to reduce compensation based on corporate and individual performance and other factors.

Mix of Performance Metrics. The performance metrics associated with our incentive programs incorporate a variety of drivers of the business over both annual and three-year time horizons. They also include a qualitative component, providing the Compensation Committee with flexibility beyond its inherent negative discretion.

Mix of Incentives. Our compensation programs provide an appropriate mix of short-term and long-term incentives, as well as cash and equity opportunities.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 38

Mix of Performance Metrics. The performance metrics associated with our incentive programs incorporate a variety of drivers of the business over both annual and three-year time horizons.


Cap on Long-Term Incentive Awards. All long-term incentive awards have a maximum performance measure which caps the payout for any given performance-based award.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 37

Strong Link to Stockholder Interests. Equity components and long-term performance metrics create a strong alignment between our executives’ interests and our stockholders’ interests. Because long-term incentives typically vest over a three-year period, our executives will always have unvested awards that could decrease in value if our business is not well-managed for the long term.


Review by Independent Compensation Consultant. Our executive compensation programs have been reviewed and analyzed by an independent compensation consultant.

Strong Link to Stockholder Interests. Equity components and long-term performance metrics create a strong alignment between our executives’ interests and our stockholders’ interests. Because long-term incentives typically vest over a three-year period, our executives will always have unvested awards that could decrease in value if our business is not well-managed for the long term.

Alignment with Annual Budget and Long-Term Strategic Plan. Performance metrics in our short- and long-term incentive programs are aligned with both our annual budget and our long-term strategic plan.

Alignment with Annual Budget and Long-Term Strategic Plan. Performance metrics in our short- and long-term incentive programs are aligned with both our annual budget and our long-term strategic plan.

Protective Policies. We have adopted a “clawback” policy, a stock ownership and retention policy, and prohibitions against hedging and pledging, thereby creating additional protections for our company and encouraging an alignment of our executives’ and stockholders’ interests.

Appropriate Policies. We have adopted a “clawback” policy, a stock ownership and retention policy, and prohibitions against hedging and pledging, thereby creating additional protections for our company and encouraging an alignment of our executives’ and stockholders’ interests.

Field Incentive Plan. Our operations field incentive plan is focused on growth, control, and profit—the three primary drivers of success in our branches. This creates appropriate alignment of employee incentive opportunities with company goals.

Field Incentive Plan. Our operations field incentive plan is focused on growth, control, and profit—the three primary drivers of success in our branches. This creates appropriate alignment of employee incentive opportunities with company goals.

Administration and Disclosure. Administrative procedures, communication, and disclosure processes closely align with “best practices.”

Administration and Disclosure. Administrative procedures, communication, and disclosure processes closely align with “best practices.”

Securities Trading Policy. Officers must obtain permission from the General Counsel before the purchase or sale of any shares, even during an open trading period.

Securities Trading Policy. Officers must obtain permission from the General Counsel before the purchase or sale of any shares, even during an open trading period.

Based on the factors above, we believe that our NEOs and other employees are encouraged to manage our company in a prudent manner and that our incentive programs are not designed to encourage our NEOs or other employees to take excessive risks or risks that are inconsistent with the Company’s and our stockholders’ best interests. In addition, we have in place various controls and management processes that help mitigate the potential for incentive compensation plans to materially and adversely affect the Company.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 38

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 39


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORTCompensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the foregoing “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management. Based upon such review, the related discussions, and such other matters deemed relevant and appropriate to the Compensation Committee, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Directors that the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this Proxy Statement and in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182021 through incorporation by reference to this Proxy Statement.

Members of the Compensation

Members of the

Compensation Committee:

Steven J. Freiberg (Chair)

Maria Contreras-Sweet

Carlos Palomares

Committee:

Steven J. Freiberg (Chair)

Roel C. Campos

Maria Contreras-Sweet

Carlos Palomares

The Compensation Committee report does not constitute soliciting material, and shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate the Compensation Committee report by reference therein.


Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 40


 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 39

Executive Compensation Tables


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth the cash and other compensation that we paid to our named executive officers or that was otherwise earned by our named executive officers for their services in all employment capacities during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016.2019.  

 

Name and Principal Position(1)

   Year       Salary    
($)(3)
 Bonus
    ($)(4)    
 Stock
Awards
    ($)(5)    
 Option
Awards
    ($)(6)    
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
  Compensation  
($)(7)
 All Other
  Compensation  
    ($)(8)    
 Total
      ($)      

Peter R. Knitzer,(2)

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

2018

 

 

550,000

 

 

 

 

733,314

 

 

733,327

 

 

548,350

 

 

83,701

 

 

2,648,692

 2017 530,000  949,985  522,580 42,552 2,045,117
 2016

 

 221,557

 

 

 

 

 

 949,997

 

 221,557

 

 30,114

 

 1,423,225

 

 

John D. Schachtel,

 2018 360,000  274,986  358,920 72,659 1,066,565

Executive Vice President and

Chief Operating Officer

 

 2017 207,123   299,994 204,224 21,239 732,580
 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donald E. Thomas,

 2018 355,000  177,495 177,499 547,375 45,246 1,302,615

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

 

 2017 342,000 66,667 170,994 170,995 337,212 24,900 1,112,768
 2016

 

 332,000

 

 33,333

 

 265,970

 

 165,998

 

 250,267

 

 27,250

 

 1,074,818

 

 

Daniel J. Taggart,

 2018 330,000  109,977 109,998 448,648 25,993 1,024,616

Executive Vice President and

Chief Credit Risk Officer

 

 2017 318,000  105,987 105,998 313,548 8,810 852,343
 2016

 

 308,000

 

 

 

 102,651

 

 102,661

 

 232,175

 

 900

 

 746,387

 

 

Brian J. Fisher,

 2018 300,000  99,977 100,000 410,774 16,963 927,714

Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary

 2017 240,000 50,000 80,000 79,994 236,640 10,800 697,434
 2016

 

 230,000

 

 43,750

 

 170,817

 

 95,826

 

 104,026

 

 12,390

 

 656,809

 

Name and Principal Position(1)

 

Year

 

Salary(2)

($)

 

 

Bonus(3)

($)

 

 

Stock

Awards(4)

($)

 

 

Option

Awards(5)

($)

 

 

Non-Equity

Incentive Plan

Compensation(6)

($)

 

 

All Other

Compensation(7)

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Robert W. Beck,

 

2021

 

 

640,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,119,954

 

 

 

559,992

 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

42,179

 

 

 

3,726,285

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

2020

 

 

557,036

 

 

 

 

 

 

829,495

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

984,205

 

 

 

30,157

 

 

 

2,800,893

 

 

 

2019

 

 

178,630

 

 

 

 

 

 

224,981

 

 

 

224,990

 

 

 

178,630

 

 

 

73,104

 

 

 

880,335

 

Harpreet Rana,

 

2021

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

166,240

 

 

 

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

20,877

 

 

 

1,155,517

 

Executive Vice President and

 

2020

 

 

42,623

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

166,242

 

 

 

166,240

 

 

 

53,279

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

535,884

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel,

 

2021

 

 

428,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

320,996

 

 

 

160,499

 

 

 

779,863

 

 

 

46,055

 

 

 

1,735,413

 

Executive Vice President and

 

2020

 

 

415,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

322,722

 

 

 

155,625

 

 

 

833,488

 

 

 

59,585

 

 

 

1,786,420

 

Chief Operating Officer

 

2019

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

299,984

 

 

 

149,994

 

 

 

322,800

 

 

 

61,705

 

 

 

1,234,483

 

Brian J. Fisher,

 

2021

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

299,964

 

 

 

149,996

 

 

 

664,252

 

 

 

25,699

 

 

 

1,539,911

 

Executive Vice President and Chief

 

2020

 

 

370,164

 

 

 

 

 

 

279,956

 

 

 

134,997

 

 

 

577,155

 

 

 

21,271

 

 

 

1,383,543

 

Strategy and Development Officer

 

2019

 

 

335,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

217,459

 

 

 

133,748

 

 

 

371,601

 

 

 

15,910

 

 

 

1,073,718

 

Manish Parmar,

 

2021

 

 

352,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

263,942

 

 

 

131,990

 

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

24,879

 

 

 

1,273,003

 

Executive Vice President and

 

2020

 

 

330,423

 

 

 

250,000

 

 

 

477,045

 

 

 

125,617

 

 

 

413,029

 

 

 

171,100

 

 

 

1,767,214

 

Chief Credit Risk Officer

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_________

(1)

Messrs. Knitzer,Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, Mr. Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart,Mr. Fisher, and FisherMr. Parmar commenced employment effective as of August 1, 2016,July 22, 2019, November 23, 2020, May 30, 2017, January 2,14, 2013, January 5, 2015, and January 14, 2013,6, 2020, respectively.

(2)

Immediately prior Mr. Beck was promoted to his appointment as ourPresident and Chief Executive Officer Mr. Knitzer served as anon-employeeeffective March 26, 2020. director on our Board, a role in which he had served since his initial appointment in July 2015. The table above reflects the compensation paid to Mr. Knitzer in his capacity as our Chief Executive Officer. Following the effectiveness of his appointment as our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Knitzer was no longer entitled to receive separate compensation for his service on the Board.

(3)

(2)

The amounts represent annual base salaries,pro-rated for any partial year.year of service. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Base Salary.”

(4)

(3)

For 2017,2020, Ms. Rana and Mr. Parmar received signing bonuses awarded upon the commencement of their employment with the Company in the amounts represent installment payments totalingtwo-thirdsof cash retention awards granted to Mr. Thomas$100,000 and Mr. Fisher in 2016 pursuant to our key employee retention program.$250,000, respectively.

(4)

For 2016, the amounts representone-third installment payments of cash retention awards granted to Mr. Thomas and Mr. Fisher in 2016 pursuant to our key employee retention program, and installment payments totaling three-quarters of a cash retention award granted to Mr. Fisher in 2015 pursuant to our key employee retention program.

For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Key Employee Retention Program.”

(5)

Amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For a discussion of the assumptions made in such valuation, see note 1516 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

In 2018,2021, Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart,Fisher, and Parmar were granted performance-contingent RSUs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Beck, $559,977; Ms. Rana, $166,240; Mr. Schachtel, $160,498; Mr. Fisher, $149,982, and Mr. Parmar, $131,971 (and a maximum potential value of $839,965; $249,345; $240,733; $224,958 and $197,941, respectively). The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period.

In 2021, Messrs. Beck, Schachtel, Fisher, and Parmar were granted RSAs having the following total grant date fair values: Mr. Beck, $559,977; Mr. Schachtel, $160,498; Mr. Fisher, $149,982; and Mr. Parmar, $131,971. One-third of the shares subject to the RSA granted to each of Messrs. Beck, Schachtel, Fisher, and Parmar vests on each of December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023, so long as such employee’s employment continues (or is deemed to continue) from the grant date through the respective vesting dates or as otherwise provided in the applicable RSA agreement.

In 2020, Messrs. Beck, Schachtel, Fisher, and Parmar were granted performance-contingent RSUs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Beck, $429,505; Mr. Schachtel, $167,101; Mr. Fisher, $144,960; and Mr. Parmar, $134,889 (and a maximum potential value of $599,972; $233,425; $202,497; and $188,421, respectively). At the time the award was granted, the Compensation Committee decided to calculate the number of shares subject to the RSU awards using a 25-day weighted

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 41


average stock price due to the market volatility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2022, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period.

In 2020, Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and Messrs. Schachtel, Fisher, and Parmar were granted RSAs having the following total grant date fair values: Mr. Beck, $399,990; Ms. Rana, $166,242; Mr. Schachtel, $155,621; Mr. Fisher, $134,996; and Mr. Parmar, $342,156. One-third of the shares subject to the RSA granted to each of Messrs. Beck, Schachtel, and Fisher vests on each of December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2022, so long as such employee’s employment continues (or is deemed to continue) from the grant date through the respective vesting dates or as otherwise provided in the applicable RSA agreement. In 2020, Mr. Parmar was granted two RSAs. The first RSA was granted on January 6, 2020 and has a grant date fair value of $147,622. One-third of the shares subject to Mr. Parmar’s January 6, 2020 RSA vests on each of December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, and December 31, 2022, so long as his employment continues (or is deemed to continue) from the grant date through the respective vesting dates or as otherwise provided in the applicable RSA agreement. Mr. Parmar’s second RSA was granted on July 1, 2020 and has a grant date fair value of $194,534. One-fourth of the shares subject to Mr. Parmar’s July 1, 2020 RSA vests on each of December 31, 2020, December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023, so long as his employment continues (or is deemed to continue) from the grant date through the respective vesting dates or as otherwise provided in the applicable RSA agreement. Ms. Rana’s RSA was granted on November 23, 2020 and has a grant date fair value of $166,242. One-third of the shares subject to Ms. Rana’s RSA vests on each of December 31, 2021, December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2023, so long as her employment continues (or is deemed to continue) from the grant date through the respective vesting dates or as otherwise provided in the applicable RSA agreement.

In 2019, Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher were granted performance-contingent RSUs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Knitzer, $733,314; Mr. Schachtel, $274,986; Mr. Thomas, $177,495; Mr. Taggart, $109,977;$149,992, and Mr. Fisher, $99,977$83,726 (and a maximum potential value of $1,099,970; $412,478; $266,228; $164,952;$224,989 and $149,951,$125,589, respectively). The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 20182019 through December 31,

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 40


2020, 2021, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period.

In 2017, Messrs. Knitzer, Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher were granted performance-contingent RSUs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Knitzer, $949,985; Mr. Thomas, $170,994; Mr. Taggart, $105,987; and Mr. Fisher, $80,000 (and a maximum potential value of $1,424,967; $256,492; $158,980; and $120,000, respectively). The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period.

In 2016, pursuant to our key employee retention program, Mr. Thomas and Mr. Fisher each were granted a service-based RSA with grant date fair values of $99,986 and $74,998, respectively. The RSAs vested on September 29, 2017. In addition, in 2016, Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher were granted performance-contingent RSUs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Thomas, $165,983; Mr. Taggart, $102,651; and Mr. Fisher, $95,819 (and a maximum potential value of $248,975; $153,976; and $143,728, respectively). The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may have been earned ranged from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. In March 2019,April 2022, based upon results achieved during the performance period, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Schachtel and Fisher earned 116.5%95.6% of their 20162019 target RSUs.

In 2019, Messrs. Beck, Schachtel, and Fisher were granted RSAs having the following grant date fair values: Mr. Beck, $224,981; Mr. Schachtel, $149,992; and Mr. Fisher, $133,733. One-third of the shares subject to the RSA granted to each of Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher vested on each of December 31, 2019, December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The shares subject to the RSA granted to Mr. Beck vested on December 31, 2019 (20%), December 31, 2020 (40%), and December 31, 2021 (40%).

The performance-contingent RSUs and the service-based RSAs are subject to further terms and conditions, including as to vesting, as set forth in an award agreement. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Key Employee Retention Program.Awards.

(6)

(5)

Amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For a discussion of the assumptions made in such valuation, see note 1516 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

For 2018,2021, the option awards granted to Messrs. Knitzer, Thomas, Taggart,Beck, Schachtel, Fisher, and FisherParmar vest in three equal installments on each of December 31, 2018, 2019,2021, 2022, and 2020.2023.

For 2017,2020, the option awards granted to Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Beck, Schachtel, Fisher, and FisherParmar vest in three equal installments on each of December 31, 2017, 2018,2020, 2021, and 2019.2022. The option award granted to Mr. SchachtelMs. Rana vests on December 31, 2017 (20%), December 31, 2018 (40%), and December 31, 2019 (40%).

For 2016, the option awards granted to Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher vest in three equal installments on each of December 31, 2016, 2017,2021, 2022, and 2018.2023.

For 2019, the option awards granted to Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher vested in three equal installments on each of December 31, 2019, 2020, and 2021. The option award granted to Mr. Knitzer vestsBeck vested on December 31, 20162019 (20%), December 31, 20172020 (40%), and December 31, 20182021 (40%).

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 42


The option awards are subject to further terms and conditions, including as to vesting, as set forth in an award agreement. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(7)

(6)

For 2018,2021, the amounts for Messrs. KnitzerMr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and SchachtelMr. Parmar represent performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2018.2021. For Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Schachtel and Fisher, the amounts represent performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2018,2021 and cash-settled performance units that were granted in 20162019 and earned over a performance period of January 1, 20162019 through December 31, 2018.2021. In the case of the performance-based annual cash awards, Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Schachtel and Fisher earned the following amounts: Mr. Thomas, $353,935; Mr. Taggart, $329,010;$608,188 and Mr. Fisher, $299,100.$568,400, respectively. In the case of the cash-settled performance units, Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Schachtel and Fisher earned the following amounts: Mr. Thomas, $193,440; Mr. Taggart, $119,638;$171,675 and Mr. Fisher, $111,674.$95,852, respectively. We paid all such earned amounts in 2019.2022.

For 20162020, the amounts for Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and 2017,Mr. Parmar represent performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2020. For Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher, the amounts represent performance-based annual cash awards earned in each2020 and cash-settled performance units that were granted in 2018 and earned over a performance period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. In the case of the performance-based annual cash awards, Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher earned $518,750 and $462,705, respectively. In the case of the cash-settled performance units, Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher earned $314,738 and $114,450, respectively. We paid all such yearearned amounts in 2021.

For 2019, the amounts for Messrs. Beck and Schachtel represent performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2019. For Mr. Fisher, the amount represents performance-based annual cash awards earned in 2019 and cash-settled performance units that were granted in 2017 and earned over a performance period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019. In the case of the performance-based annual cash awards, Mr. Fisher earned $270,345. In the case of the cash-settled performance units, Mr. Fisher earned $101,256. We paid all such earned amounts in the following year.2020.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 41


For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Performance-Based Annual Cash Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(8)

(7)

The following table provides detail regarding the amounts in the “All Other Compensation” column. In 2020, the amounts attributable to Mr. Parmar’s legal expenses and reimbursement to his former employer for relocation benefits shown below include tax reimbursements in the amount of $311 and $17,939, respectively. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Perquisites.”

 

Name

 Year 401(k)
Plan
 Match 

($)
Travel
Expense to/
from
Personal
 Residence 

($)
 Optional 
Annual
Health
Screening

($)
 Automobile 
Allowance

($)
Mobile
Phone
 Allowance 

($)
Legal
 Expenses 

($)
 Spousal 
Travel

($)
 Relocation 
Benefits

($)
Long-Term
Disability
 Insurance & 
Associated
Taxes

($)
  Total  
($)

Peter R. Knitzer

2018

2017

2016

11,000

8,969

39,551

32,683

18,566

3,546

900

900

375

10,000

1,173

28,704

83,701

42,552

30,114

John D. Schachtel

2018

2017

2016

11,000

33,088

18,327

3,966

900

525

2,387

3,271

20,434

72,659

21,239

Donald E. Thomas

2018

2017

2016

11,000

10,800

10,600

2,850

13,800

13,800

13,800

900

300

19,546

45,246

24,900

27,250

Daniel J. Taggart

2018

2017

2016

11,000

6,605

4,563

900

900

900

1,305

9,530

25,993

8,810

900

Brian J. Fisher

2018

2017

2016

11,000

10,800

10,600

1,790

5,963

16,963

10,800

12,390

Name

 

Year

 

Dividends

($)

 

 

401(k)

Plan

Match

($)

 

 

Travel

Expense

to/from

Personal

Residence

($)

 

 

Optional

Annual

Health

Screening

($)

 

 

Mobile

Phone

Allowance

($)

 

 

Legal

Expenses

($)

 

 

Travel

with

Spouse

($)

 

 

Relocation

Benefits

($)

 

 

Reimbursement to Former Employer for Relocation Benefits

($)

 

 

Long-

Term

Disability

Insurance

Benefits

($)

 

 

Total

($)

 

Robert W. Beck

 

2021

 

 

19,153

 

 

 

11,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10,526

 

 

 

42,179

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2,311

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

876

 

 

 

 

 

 

675

 

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,895

 

 

 

30,157

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,604

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

73,104

 

Harpreet Rana

 

2021

 

 

1,866

 

 

 

11,600

 

 

 

5,431

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,980

 

 

 

20,877

 

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,500

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel

 

2021

 

 

11,781

 

 

 

11,600

 

 

 

6,247

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,528

 

 

 

46,056

 

 

 

2020

 

 

981

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

7,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

4,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

33,827

 

 

 

59,585

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

11,200

 

 

 

26,097

 

 

 

2,686

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,153

 

 

 

61,705

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

2021

 

 

8,136

 

 

 

11,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,963

 

 

 

25,699

 

 

 

2020

 

 

860

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,011

 

 

 

21,271

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

11,200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,710

 

 

 

15,910

 

Manish Parmar

 

2021

 

 

6,449

 

 

 

11,600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,930

 

 

 

24,879

 

 

 

2020

 

 

881

 

 

 

11,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

900

 

 

 

911

 

 

 

 

 

 

104,236

 

 

 

52,497

 

 

 

274

 

 

 

171,099

 

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 42

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 43



Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information concerning annual and long-term incentive awards granted in 20182021 to each of our named executive officers pursuant to our Annual Incentive Plan and our 2015 Plan.

 

Name

 Award
Type(1)
 Grant
Date
 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan  Awards

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts Under
  Equity Incentive Plan Awards  

 All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
 Underlying 
Options

(#)
  Exercise 
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards

($/Sh)
 Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
 and Option 
Awards

($)(3)
 

 

 Threshold 

($)(2)

  Target 
($)
  Maximum 
($)
 Threshold
(#)(2)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)

Peter R. Knitzer

 Annual 02/07/18  550,000 825,000      
 NQSO 02/07/18       59,187 28.25 733,327
 RSU 02/07/18    11,681 25,958 38,937   733,314
 CSPU 02/07/18 330,000 733,333 1,100,000      

John D. Schachtel

 Annual 02/07/18  360,000 540,000      
 RSU 02/07/18    4,380 9,734 14,601   274,986
 CSPU 02/07/18 123,750 275,000 412,500      

Donald E. Thomas

 Annual 02/07/18  355,000 532,500      
 NQSO 02/07/18       14,326 28.25 177,499
 RSU 02/07/18    2,827 6,283 9,424   177,495
 CSPU 02/07/18 79,875 177,500 266,250      

Daniel J. Taggart

 Annual 02/07/18  330,000 495,000      
 NQSO 02/07/18       8,878 28.25 109,998
 RSU 02/07/18    1,751 3,893 5,839   109,977
 CSPU 02/07/18 49,500 110,000 165,000      

Brian J. Fisher

 Annual 02/07/18  300,000 450,000      
 NQSO 02/07/18       8,071 28.25 100,000
 RSU 02/07/18    1,592 3,539 5,308   99,977
 CSPU 02/07/18 45,000 100,000 150,000      

 

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts

Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards

 

 

All Other

Stock

Awards:

Number of

Shares of

Stock or

 

 

All Other

Option

Awards:

Number of

Securities

Underlying

 

 

Exercise or

Base Price

of Option

 

 

Grant Date

Fair Value

of Stock and

Option

 

Name

 

Award

Type(1)

 

Grant

Date

 

Threshold(2)

($)

 

 

Target

($)

 

 

Maximum

($)

 

 

Threshold(2)

(#)

 

 

Target

(#)

 

 

Maximum

(#)

 

 

Units

(#)

 

 

Options

(#)

 

 

Awards

($/Sh)

 

 

Awards(3)

($)

 

Robert W. Beck

 

Annual

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

960,000

 

 

 

1,440,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NQSO

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

53,742

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

 

559,992

 

 

 

RSU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8,338

 

 

 

18,530

 

 

 

27,795

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

559,977

 

 

 

CSPU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

252,000

 

 

 

560,000

 

 

 

840,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSA

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

18,530

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

559,977

 

Harpreet Rana

 

Annual

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,475

 

 

 

5,501

 

 

 

8,251

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

166,240

 

 

 

CSPU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

74,812

 

 

 

166,250

 

 

 

249,375

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel

 

Annual

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

428,000

 

 

 

642,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NQSO

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15,403

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

 

160,499

 

 

 

RSU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,389

 

 

 

5,311

 

 

 

7,966

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

160,498

 

 

 

CSPU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

72,225

 

 

 

160,500

 

 

 

240,750

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSA

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

160,498

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

Annual

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

400,000

 

 

 

600,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NQSO

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,395

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

 

149,996

 

 

 

RSU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,233

 

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

7,444

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

149,982

 

 

 

CSPU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

67,500

 

 

 

150,000

 

 

 

225,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSA

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

149,982

 

Manish Parmar

 

Annual

 

1/1/2021

 

 

 

 

 

352,000

 

 

 

528,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NQSO

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,667

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

 

131,990

 

 

 

RSU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,965

 

 

 

4,367

 

 

 

6,550

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131,971

 

 

 

CSPU

 

2/4/2021

 

 

59,400

 

 

 

132,000

 

 

 

198,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSA

 

2/4/2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

131,971

 

(1)

“Annual” refers to performance-based annual cash incentive award opportunities granted under our Annual Incentive Plan. “NQSO” refers tonon-qualified stock options, “RSU” refers to performance-contingent restricted stock units, and “CSPU” refers to cash-settled performance units (with each unit’s target value denominated as $1.00), and “RSA” refers to restricted stock award, each granted under our 2015 Plan. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Performance-Based Annual Cash Awards” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(2)

The threshold number of units indicated will be earned only if a threshold level of performance is achieved.

(3)

Amounts shown are the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. For a discussion of the assumptions made in such valuation, see note 1516 of the notes to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. For performance-contingent RSUs, the grant date fair value is calculated using the target number of shares.2021.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 44

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 43



Outstanding Equity Awards Awards at FiscalYear-End

The following table provides information concerning equity awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2018,2021, for each of our named executive officers.

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Exercisable

(#)

 

 

Number of

Securities

Underlying

Unexercised

Options

Unexercisable

(#)

 

 

Option

Exercise

Price

($)

 

 

Option

Expiration

Date

 

Number of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested

(#)

 

Market

Value of

Shares or

Units of

Stock that

Have Not

Vested(1)

($)

 

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Number of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

that Have

Not Vested

(#)

 

Equity

Incentive

Plan

Awards:

Market or

Payout

Value of

Unearned

Shares,

Units or

Other Rights

that Have

Not Vested(1)

($)

 

Robert W. Beck

 

 

21,489

 

 

 

 

 

 

25.35

 

 

07/22/29

 

8,003(4)

 

 

459,852

 

 

27,081(7)

 

 

1,556,074

 

 

 

37,192

 

 

18,596(2)

 

 

 

16.66

 

 

03/26/30

 

12,354(5)

 

 

709,861

 

 

18,530(8)

 

 

1,064,734

 

 Option Awards Stock Awards

 

 

17,914

 

 

35,828(3)

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

02/04/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Name

 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
 Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
 Option
Exercise
Price
($)
 Option
Expiration
Date
 Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
(#)
 Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock that
Have Not
Vested
($)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
that Have
Not Vested
(#)
 Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
that Have
Not Vested
($)(1)

Peter R. Knitzer

 

 

5,111

 

 

 

 

19.42

 

 

07/28/25

 

 

 

 

 

 

47,523(6)

 

 

1,142,928

 8,422  15.89 05/04/26   25,958(7) 624,290
 113,636  18.90 08/01/26    
 19,729 39,458(2) 28.25 02/07/28    

Harpreet Rana

 

 

5,790

 

 

11,581(3)

 

 

 

28.21

 

 

11/23/30

 

3,929(5)

 

 

225,760

 

 

5,501(8)

 

 

316,087

 

John D. Schachtel

 

 

20,641

 

 

13,762(3)

 

 

20.00

 

 

05/30/27

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,734(7)

 

 

234,103

 

 

34,403

 

 

 

 

 

 

20.00

 

 

05/30/27

 

3,115(4)

 

 

178,988

 

 

5,138(9)

 

 

295,229

 

Donald E. Thomas

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

16.73

 

 

01/02/23

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,323(5)

 

 

272,318

 26,500  33.93 12/31/23   8,554(6) 205,724
 19,867  17.76 10/01/24   6,283(7) 151,106
 32,500  15.06 03/11/25    
 23,042  14.75 04/22/25    
 21,444  17.08 03/29/26    
 12,708 6,355(4) 19.99 03/15/27    
 4,775 9,551(2) 28.25 02/07/28    

Daniel J. Taggart

 

 

13,194

 

 

 

 

15.24

 

 

01/05/25

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,003(5)

 

 

168,422

 13,262  17.08 03/29/26   5,302(6) 127,513

 

 

12,427

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.89

 

 

02/06/29

 

3,541(5)

 

 

203,466

 

 

10,536(7)

 

 

605,399

 

 7,878 3,939(4) 19.99 03/15/27   3,893(7) 93,627

 

 

14,470

 

 

7,235(2)

 

 

 

16.66

 

 

03/26/30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,311(8)

 

 

305,170

 

 2,959 5,919(2) 28.25 02/07/28    

 

 

5,134

 

 

10,269(3)

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

02/04/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

 

9,644

 

 

 

 

17.76

 

 

10/01/24

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,537(5)

 

 

157,215

 

 

12,379

 

 

 

 

 

 

17.08

 

 

03/29/26

 

2,701(4)

 

 

155,199

 

 

2,868(9)

 

 

164,795

 

 11,500  15.06 03/11/25   4,002(6) 96,248

 

 

8,918

 

 

 

 

 

 

19.99

 

 

03/15/27

 

3,309(5)

 

 

190,135

 

 

9,140(7)

 

 

525,184

 

 13,143  14.75 04/22/25   3,539(7) 85,113

 

 

8,071

 

 

 

 

 

 

28.25

 

 

02/07/28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,963(8)

 

 

285,174

 

 12,379  17.08��03/29/26    

 

 

11,081

 

 

 

 

 

 

27.89

 

 

02/06/29

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 5,944 2,974(4) 19.99 03/15/27    

 

 

12,552

 

 

6,276(2)

 

 

 

16.66

 

 

03/26/30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 2,690 5,381(2) 28.25 02/07/28    

 

 

4,798

 

 

9,597(3)

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

02/04/31

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Manish Parmar

 

 

6,960

 

 

3,482(2)

 

 

 

29.18

 

 

01/06/30

 

1,687(4)

 

 

96,935

 

 

8,505(7)

 

 

488,697

 

 

 

4,222

 

 

8,445(3)

 

 

 

30.22

 

 

02/04/31

 

5,440(6)

 

 

312,582

 

 

4,367(8)

 

 

250,928

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,912(5)

 

 

167,324

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

__________

(1)

Amounts are calculated based on the closing price ($24.05)57.46) of our common stock on December 31, 2018,2021, the last trading day of 2018.2021.

(2)

This option vests in three equal annual installments on each of December 31, 2018, 2019,2020, 2021, and 2020.2022.

(3)

This option vests on December 31, 2017 (20%), December 31, 2018 (40%), and December 31, 2019 (40%).

(4)

This option vests in three equal annual installments on each of December 31, 2017, 2018,2021, 2022, and 2019.2023.

(5)

(4)

This amount represents the earnedunvested portion of a performance-contingent RSU that became eligible to vestrestricted stock award, which vests in three equal annual installments on each of December 31, 2018, subject to our Compensation Committee’s certification as to2020, 2021, and 2022.

(5)

This amount represents the achievementunvested portion of certain performance goals. The actual numbera restricted stock award, which vests in three equal annual installments on each of RSUs, if any, that may have been earned ranged from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2018,2021, 2022, and to2023.

(6)

This amount represents the unvested portion of a lesser extent (10%)restricted stock award, which vests in four equal annual installments on our Compensation Committee’s assessmenteach of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. The number of target RSUs granted to Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher were as follows: Mr. Thomas, 9,718 units; Mr. Taggart, 6,010 units; and Mr. Fisher, 5,610 units. Vesting was also contingent upon the continued employment of the executive through December 31, 2018. In March 2019, based upon results achieved during the performance period, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,2020, 2021, 2022, and Fisher earned 116.5% of their target RSUs. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”2023.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 44


(6)

(7)

This amount represents a performance-contingent RSU, assuming an achievement level at target. The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units set forth in the table above, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 20172020 through December 31, 2019,2022, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. Vesting is also contingent upon the continued employment of the executive through December 31, 2019,2022, or as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(7)

(8)

This amount represents a performance-contingent RSU, assuming an achievement level at target. The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may be earned may range from 0% to 150% of the target number of units set forth in the table above, based

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 45


primarily (90%) on our CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 20182021 through December 31, 2020,2023, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. Vesting is also contingent upon the continued employment of the executive through December 31, 2020,2023, or as otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(9)

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for

This amount represents the earned portion of a performance-contingent RSU that became eligible to vest on December 31, 2021, subject to our Compensation Committee’s certification as to the achievement of certain performance goals.  The actual number of RSUs, if any, that may have been earned ranged from 0% to 150% of the target number of units, based primarily (90%) on our CAGR of pre-provision net income compared to our peer group over the performance period, January 1, 2019 Annual Meeting |

 45through December 31, 2021, and to a lesser extent (10%) on our Compensation Committee’s assessment of our executive team’s achievement of its long-term strategic objectives over the same time period. The number of target RSUs granted to Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher were as follows: Mr. Schachtel, 5,378 units, and Mr. Fisher, 3,002 units. Vesting was also contingent upon the continued employment of the executive through December 31, 2021. In April 2022, based upon results achieved during the performance period, our Compensation Committee determined that Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher earned 95.6% of their target RSUs. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”


Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table summarizes the exercise of options and the vesting of stock awards by each of our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

 

  Option Awards Stock Awards

Name

 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise

(#)
 Value Realized
on Exercise

($)
 Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(1)

(#)
 Value Realized
on Vesting(2)

($)

 

Peter R. Knitzer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Donald E. Thomas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,323

 

 

 

272,318

 

 

Daniel J. Taggart

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,003

 

 

 

168,422

 

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,537

 

 

 

157,215

 

 

 

Option Awards

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

Shares

Acquired

on Exercise

(#)

 

 

Value

Realized

on Exercise(1)

($)

 

 

Number of

Shares

Acquired

on Vesting(2)

(#)

 

 

Value

Realized

on Vesting(3)

($)

 

Robert W. Beck

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17,729

 

 

 

1,018,708

 

Harpreet Rana

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,964

 

 

 

112,851

 

John D. Schachtel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,815

 

 

 

625,403

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

 

13,606

 

 

 

1,530,208

 

 

 

8,822

 

 

 

477,056

 

Manish Parmar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,861

 

 

 

336,773

 

(1)

The value realized upon exercise of stock option awards was calculated by determining the difference between the market price of the underlying securities at exercise and the exercise price of the options.

(2)

For Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and Messrs. Schachtel, Fisher, and Parmar the amounts represent the number of shares delivered following the vesting of restricted stock subject to RSAs on December 31, 2021. For Messrs. Schachtel and Fisher, the amounts also include the number of shares delivered following the vesting of performance-contingent RSUs on December 31, 2018,2021, based upon results achieved during a performance period that began on January 1, 20162019 and ended on December 31, 2018,2021, as determined by our Compensation Committee in March 2019.April 2022. For additional information, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Compensation – Long-Term Incentive Awards.”

(2)

(3)

Amounts are calculated based onThe value represents the gross number of shares that vested, multiplied by the closing price ($24.05) of our common stock on December 31, 2018, the last trading day of 2018.applicable vesting date, and includes any amounts that were withheld for applicable taxes.  

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 46

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 46



Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information concerning the common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights under all of our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018.2021. At that date, there were a total of 11,776,6929,788,000 shares of our common stock outstanding.

 

Plan Category

 (a)
Number of Securities to
Be Issued Upon
Exercise of Outstanding
Options,
Warrants, and Rights
  (b)
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants, and Rights
($)
  (c)
Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding
Securities Reflected in
Column (a))
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

   

2011 Stock Incentive Plan(1)

  299,962(3)   17.85      —      

2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan(2)

  1,031,564(4)   19.07(5)   1,099,349    

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

  —        —        —      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Total:

  1,331,526      18.69      1,099,349    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Plan Category

 

(a)

Number of Securities to

Be Issued Upon

Exercise of Outstanding

Options,

Warrants, and Rights

 

(b)

Weighted-Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding Options,

Warrants, and Rights

($)

 

(c)

Number of Securities

Remaining Available for

Future Issuance Under

Equity Compensation

Plans (Excluding

Securities Reflected in

Column (a))

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 Stock Incentive Plan(1)

 

9,822(3)

 

15.97

 

2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan(2)

 

891,007(4)

 

22.61(5)

 

1,054,293

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders

 

 

 

Total:

 

900,829

 

22.50

 

1,054,293

(1)

Regional Management Corp. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.Plan (the “2011 Plan”). In 2015, our stockholders approved the 2015 Plan, at which time all shares then available for issuance under the 2011 Plan rolled over to the 2015 Plan. Awards may no longer be granted under the 2011 Plan. However, awards that are outstanding under the 2011 Plan will continue in accordance with their respective terms.

(2)

Regional Management Corp. 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan. As of March 22, 2019,April 4, 2022, there were 926,643926,224 shares that remained available for issuance under the 2015 Plan, which allows for grants of incentive stock options,non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), unrestricted shares, restricted shares, RSUs, phantom stock awards, and awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, the fair market value of shares, including performance-based awards.

(3)

This amount represents shares of common stock underlyingnon-qualified stock option awards.

(4)

This amount represents 680,545578,755 shares of common stock underlyingnon-qualified stock option awards, 272,779193,442 shares of common stock underlying performance-contingent RSU awards, and 78,240118,522 restricted shares of common stock underlying and issuable pursuant to key team member incentive program award agreements. Share amounts are determined based upon the maximum number of shares that may be delivered pursuant to the performance-based awards. Under the key team member incentive program, each participant is eligible to earn an RSA, subject to the achievement of performance goals over aone-year period. If earned, the RSA is issued following theone-year performance period and vests ratably over a subsequenttwo-year period (subject to continued employment or as otherwise provided in the underlying award agreement). No current executive officer participates in our key team member incentive program. There is no exercise price associated with the RSU awards or restricted shares.

(5)

Calculation excludes shares subject to RSU awards and shares underlying and issuable pursuant to key team member incentive program award agreements.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 47

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 47



CEO Pay Ratio

The following table provides our calculation under applicable SEC regulations of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees.employees for 2021.

 

Compensation Component

  CEO
($)
   Median Employee
($)
 

 

CEO

($)

 

 

Median Employee

($)

 

Salary

  

 

550,000

 

  

 

32,229

 

 

 

640,000

 

 

 

43,240

 

Stock Awards

   733,314     

 

 

1,119,954

 

 

 

 

Option Awards

  

 

733,327

 

  

 

 

 

 

559,992

 

 

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

   548,350   4,665 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

 

All Other Compensation

  

 

83,701

 

  

 

5,887

 

 

 

42,179

 

 

 

 

  

 

   

 

 

Total Compensation:

           2,648,692                    42,781         

 

 

3,726,285

 

 

 

43,240

 

  

 

   

 

 

CEO to Median Employee Pay Ratio:

  

 

62

 

 

 

:

 

 

 

1

 

 

86:1

 

We took the following steps in identifyingcalculating the ratio of the annual total compensation of our Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees in 2021:

(1)      We determined that, as of December 31, 2021, our employee population was equal to 1,691 individuals, all located in the United States. This number includes all the individuals determined to be employees for federal tax purposes, whether full-time, part-time, or temporary, as of that date. We chose December 31, 2021, which is within the last three months of our fiscal year as required by applicable SEC regulations, because it aligned with our calendar year payroll procedures.

(2)      We next identified the employee receiving the median amount of compensation in our employee population. To do this, we compared the amount of wages and other compensation received by each employee, other than Mr. Beck, as reflected in our payroll records and reported to the Internal Revenue Service in Box 5 of Form W-2 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021. This compensation measure was annualized for permanent employees who were employed on the measurement date but who did not work for the full calendar year. The compensation measure was consistently applied to all of our employees:employees.

(3)      Once we identified our median employee, we measured that employee’s annual total compensation for the 2021 fiscal year by adding together (a) the same elements of compensation that are included in Mr. Beck’s total fiscal 2021 compensation, as reported in our Summary Compensation Table above, and (b) non-discriminatory health and welfare benefits paid by Regional, if any, which we have included as “All Other Compensation” in the table above. Our median employee did not participate in non-discriminatory health and welfare benefit plans offered by Regional in 2021.

(1)

We determined that, as of December 31, 2018, our employee population was equal to 1,535 individuals, all located in the United States. This number includes all the individuals determined to be employees for federal tax purposes, whether full-time, part-time, or temporary, as of that date. We chose December 31, 2018, which is within the last three months of our fiscal year as required by applicable SEC regulations, because it aligned with our calendar year payroll procedures.

(4)      For Mr. Beck, we used the amounts reported in our Summary Compensation Table above. Mr. Beck did not participate in non-discretionary health and welfare benefit plans offered by Regional in 2021.

(2)

We next identified the employee receiving the median amount of compensation in our employee population. To do this, we compared the amount of wages and other compensation received by each employee, other than Mr. Knitzer, as reflected in our payroll records and reported to the Internal Revenue Service in Box 5 of FormW-2 for the calendar year ended December 31, 2018. This compensation measure was annualized for permanent employees who were employed on the measurement date but who did not work for the full calendar year. The compensation measure was consistently applied to all of our employees.

(3)

Once we identified our median employee, we measured that employee’s annual total compensation for the 2018 fiscal year by adding together (a) the same elements of compensation that are included in Mr. Knitzer’s total fiscal 2018 compensation, as reported in our Summary Compensation Table above, and(b) non-discriminatory health and welfare benefits paid by Regional, which we have included as “All Other Compensation” in the table above.

(4)

For Mr. Knitzer, we used the amount reported in the “Total” column of our Summary Compensation Table above. Mr. Knitzer was eligible for but did not elect to participate innon-discretionary health and welfare benefits offered by Regional.

The resulting pay ratio was calculated in a manner consistent with SEC regulations, and we believe that it constitutes a reasonable estimate. However, as contemplated by SEC regulations, we relied on methods and assumptions that we determined to be appropriate for calculating the Chief Executive Officer pay ratio at Regional. Other public companies willmay use methods and assumptions that differ from the ones we chose but are appropriate for their circumstances. It may therefore be difficult, for this and other reasons, to compare our reported pay ratio to pay ratios reported by other companies, including companies in our industry.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 48

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 48


SUMMARY OF EMPLOYMENT ARRANGEMENTS WITH EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary of Employment Arrangements with NAMED Executive Officers

In 2018,2021, the following individuals served as our named executive officers:

Peter R. Knitzer,Robert W. Beck, our President and Chief Executive Officer;

Harpreet Rana, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

John D. Schachtel, our Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer;

Donald E. Thomas,Brian J. Fisher, our Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialStrategy and Development Officer; and

Daniel J. Taggart,Manish Parmar, our Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer; andOfficer.

Brian J. Fisher, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary.

Each of these individuals served as executive officers at the beginning of 2018. Mr. Taggart assumed the title of Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Risk Officer on October 24, 2018.

We entered into employment letters or agreements with Messrs. Knitzer and Schachteleach of our named executive officers shortly before each commenced employment with us inus. We entered into initial employment agreements with each of these executives as follows: Mr. Beck (July 2019), Ms. Rana (September 2020), Mr. Schachtel (May 2017), Mr. Fisher (January 2013), and Mr. Parmar (January 2020). In August 2016 and May 2017, respectively. Similarly, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Fisher that superseded his prior employment letter agreementsagreement and amended the employment agreement of Mr. Schachtel. In addition, in March 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Mr. Beck in connection with his assumption of the title of President and Fisher shortly before each commencedChief Executive Officer, which superseded his prior employment with usagreement as our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Further, in January 2013, January 2015,July 2020 and January 2013, respectively. In August 2017,September 2020, we entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Thomas, Taggart,Schachtel and Fisher, respectively, that superseded each executive’s prior employment letter agreement. In addition, we amendedMr. Fisher’s current employment agreement occurred in the employment agreementscontext of Messrs. Knitzerhis appointment as Executive Vice President and Schachtel in August 2017. In February 2019, we entered into a retirement agreement with Mr. Thomas that amended his employment agreement.Chief Strategy and Development Officer.

We describe below the material terms of our executives’ currentnamed executive officer’s employment agreements that were in effect for the entirety of 2018, as well as Mr. Thomas’ retirement letter agreement.agreements. Additional information regarding the compensation that our named executive officers are eligible for, earned, and were paid is set forth elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, including in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the Executive Compensation Tables set forth above.

Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers

The employment agreements with each of Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart, and Fisherour named executive officers who are currently serving as executive officers provide for a three-year term. The three-year term ends on August 1, 2019 and May 30, 2020 in the case of Messrs. Knitzer and Schachtel, respectively, and on August 30, 2020 in the case of Messrs. Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher. for these officers as follows:

Name

Employment Agreement
Term End Date

Robert W. Beck

March 25, 2023

Harpreet Rana

November 23, 2023

John D. Schachtel

July 1, 2023

Brian J. Fisher

September 30, 2023

Manish Parmar

January 6, 2023

The employment agreements generally provide for compensation to our executives in the form of annual base salaries, annual cash incentive opportunities, long-term incentive opportunities, and various other limited perquisites and personal benefits. Our executives haveare also agreedsubject to certain restrictive covenants set forth in the employment agreements, including a covenant not to compete.

Pursuant to their current employment agreements, Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart, and Fisherour named executive officers are entitled to an annual base salarysalaries of no less than $530,000; $350,000; $342,000; $318,000; and $240,000, respectively,the amounts indicated below:

Name

Employment Agreement
Base Salary

Robert W. Beck

$600,000

Harpreet Rana

$400,000

John D. Schachtel

$415,000

Brian J. Fisher

$400,000

Manish Parmar

$335,000

All base salaries are (or were) pro-rated for any partial year. year pursuant to the terms of each executive’s employment agreement.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 49


For each calendar year during the employment term under Mr. Beck’s employment agreement, he is eligible to earn an annual bonus award under our Annual Incentive Plan based upon the achievement of performance targets established by our Compensation Committee, with a target bonus equal to no less than 150% of such executive’s base salary, pro-rated for any partial year. Mr. Beck’s employment agreement provides that Mr. Beck’s target annual bonus award under our Annual Incentive Plan for 2020 was $787,364. For each calendar year during the employment term, our other named executive is alsoofficers are eligible to earn an annual bonus award under our Annual Incentive Plan based upon the achievement of performance targets established by our Compensation Committee, with a target bonus equal to no less than 100% of the executive’s base salary,( in each case pro-rated for any partial year). year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr. Fisher’s employment agreement provides that his target bonus for 2020 was $370,164.

Under the terms of Ms. Rana’s employment agreement, we paid a $100,000 cash signing bonus to her in 2020 to offset her loss of forfeited incentive and/or equity-based compensation with her former employer. Ms. Rana’s signing bonus was subject to repayment in full if she voluntarily terminated her employment before the first anniversary of her employment date. We also paid a $250,000 cash signing bonus to Mr. Parmar in 2020 pursuant to his employment agreement to offset his loss of his annual bonus opportunity with his prior employer. Mr. Parmar must repay a ratable portion of his signing bonus if he terminates his employment before the third anniversary of his employment date.

The employment agreementsagreement of Messrs. Knitzer and Schachtel provideMr. Beck provides that each such executive ishe was entitled to receive anon-qualified stock option award, a restricted stock award, a performance-contingent RSU award, and a cash-settled performance unit award. Mr. Beck’s non-qualified stock option and restricted stock award withinwere granted following the effective date of his first year of employment agreement in 2020, while his performance-contingent RSU award and cash-settled performance unit award were granted in connection with the grant of other executive 2020 long-term incentive plan awards. The vesting of each such award is subject to continued employment through the vesting date and, in the case of the performance-contingent RSU award and the cash-settled performance unit award, the achievement of performance objectives established by our Compensation Committee. The employment agreements of Ms. Rana and Mr. Parmar provide that each executive was entitled to receive a non-qualified stock option award, a restricted stock award, a performance-contingent RSU award, and a cash-settled performance unit award. Ms. Rana’s non-qualified stock option and restricted stock award were granted following her commencement date in 2020, while her performance-contingent RSU award and cash-settled performance unit award were granted in connection with the grant of other executive 2021 long-term incentive plan awards. The non-qualified stock option award and restricted stock award provided for in Mr. Parmar’s employment agreement were granted as soon as practicable following his commencement date in 2020, while his performance-contingent RSU award and cash-settled performance unit award were granted in connection with the grant of other executive 2020 long-term incentive plan awards. The vesting of each of Ms. Rana’s and Mr. Parmar’s awards is subject to continued employment through the vesting date and, in the case of the performance-contingent RSU awards and the cash-settled performance unit awards, the achievement of performance objectives established by our Compensation Committee. Each named executive officer is otherwise eligible to participate in our long-term incentive program at the sole discretion of our Compensation Committee and our Board.

Commencing in 20182021 (or 2019,2022, in the case of Ms. Rana, and 2020, in the case of Mr. Schachtel), Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart, and Fisher will be eligible to receivethe employment agreements of our executives provide for an annual base salary, annual cash incentive opportunity, and long-term incentive opportunity totaling in the aggregate of at least $3,000,000; $1,225,000; $1,197,000; $954,000;the following amounts: Mr. Beck ($3,600,000), Ms. Rana ($1,400,000), Mr. Schachtel ($1,452,500), Mr. Fisher ($1,400,000), and $720,000, respectively.Mr. Parmar ($1,172,500). Each executive’s annual total compensation opportunity is subject to our Compensation Committee’s discretion to adjust base salary, determine allocations between cash and equity compensation opportunities, establish performance and/or multi-year service criteria, and determine if and to the extent any incentive compensation is earned and payable based on the attainment of performance criteria and other terms and

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 49


conditions established by our Compensation Committee, and further subject to the terms and conditions of the applicable incentive plan and related award agreements (including, if applicable under any such plan or award agreement, multi-year vesting). Long-term incentive awards are subject to the terms of the 2015 Plan and the related award agreements.

We also provide our executives with benefits generally available to our other employees, including medical and retirement plans. In addition, we provide our executives with the use of a mobile phone (or the provision of a stipend for a mobile phone), disability insurance policies, and reasonable travel expenses. In the case of Messrs. KnitzerMs. Rana and Mr. Schachtel, we pay for reasonable expenses associated with their travel to and from their personal residences to our headquarters in South Carolina. InPursuant to Mr. Beck’s employment agreement, we paid for reasonable expenses (not to exceed $5,000) associated with Mr. Beck’s travel in 2020 to and from his additional Connecticut residence to our headquarters in South Carolina. Additionally, we provided relocation benefits to Mr. Parmar under his employment agreement in 2020 to relocate to the caseDallas–Fort Worth–Arlington, Texas metropolitan area, which included reimbursement of commuting expenses to our Flower Mound, Texas office from his residence and reasonable temporary living expenses in the Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington, Texas metropolitan area. Mr. Thomas, we provideParmar is also eligible for reimbursement of amounts up to $50,000 in the event that he is required to reimburse his immediate past employer for all or a car allowance

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of $1,150 per month.Stockholders | 50


portion of his previously-reimbursed relocation expenses, with any such reimbursed amounts subject to ratable repayment in the event Mr. Parmar voluntarily terminates his employment before the third anniversary of his commencement date

Our executive employment agreements and long-term incentive award agreements also provide for certain severance benefits following an executive’s termination by us without cause, by the executive as a result of good reason, due to the executive’s disability, due to the executive’s death, or following a “double-trigger”change-in-control event. A “double trigger”“double-trigger” change-in-control event requires both (1) achange-in-control and (2) an executive’s termination by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within certain timeframes. The terms “cause,” “good reason,” “disability,” and“change-in-control” “change-in-control” are defined in the 2011 Plan, the 2015 Plan, and/or each executive’s employment agreement and/or long-term incentive award agreements, as applicable. The severance benefits are described in “Summary of Employment Arrangements with Executive Officers – Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control,” below. An executive’s receipt of any severance benefits will be subject to the executive’s execution of a release of claims within the time period specified in the employment agreement and the continued compliance with the restrictive covenants described below.

Each named executive officer is also subject to various restrictive covenants pursuant to his or her employment agreement, and his or her entitlement to certain benefits is contingent upon his or her compliance with such covenants. Specifically, the employment agreements subject each named executive is subjectofficer to a covenant not to disclose our confidential information during his or her employment and at all times thereafter, a covenant not to compete during his or her employment and for a period of one year (or two years, in the case of Mr. Knitzer)Beck) following his or her termination of employment, a covenant not to solicit competitive “business services” through or from “loan sources” (each as defined in the employment agreements) during his or her employment and for a period of one year (or two years, in the case of Mr. Knitzer)Beck) following his or her termination of employment, a covenant not to solicit or hire our employees during his or her employment and for a period of one year (or two years, in the case of Mr. Knitzer)Beck) following his or her termination of employment, and anon-disparagement covenant effective during the employment term and at all times thereafter. Each executive’s covenant not to compete is limited to an area within 25 miles of any of our branches or other offices.

In addition, each named executive officer must abide by any applicable equity retention policy, compensation recovery policy, stock ownership guidelines, or other similar policies that we maintain.

Retirement Agreement with Chief Financial Officer

On February 12, 2019, Mr. Thomas notified the Company of his intent to retire from the Company following the completion of an orderly transition of duties and responsibilities from Mr. Thomas to a new Chief Financial Officer to be identified by the Company. Mr. Thomas’ retirement will be treated as a voluntary termination of employment pursuant to the terms of Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement (described in detail above). The date of the completion of the Chief Financial Officer transition will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee approved a letter agreement (the “Retirement Agreement”), dated February 12, 2019, setting forth the terms of Mr. Thomas’ retirement. Pursuant to the Retirement Agreement, Mr. Thomas’ employment agreement was amended, among other items, to provide that the compensation terms found in the Retirement Agreement generally supersede those found in his employment agreement. The Retirement Agreement provides that Mr. Thomas will continue to serve as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer until his termination date, which will follow an orderly transition of duties and responsibilities from Mr. Thomas to a new Chief Financial Officer; however, the Company may modify his title, duties, and/or responsibilities to facilitate the hiring of and transition to a new Chief Financial Officer.

During the transition period, Mr. Thomas will be paid an annualized base salary of $400,000(pro-rated for any partial year), which is subject to increase (but not decrease) by the Company. He will also generally continue to participate in those Company benefit plans and arrangements in which he is currently eligible to participate. Mr.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 50


Thomas is eligible to receive apro-rated annual cash incentive bonus for 2019 if and to the extent that the applicable performance goals are met and the 2019 annual cash incentive bonus is deemed earned in accordance with the terms of the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan and as determined by the Compensation Committee. He also will remain eligible to receive an annual bonus for 2018 under the Annual Incentive Plan if and to the extent earned, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Thomas is also eligible to earn a completion bonus of $200,000 following the completion of an orderly transition of duties and responsibilities to a new Chief Financial Officer. No completion bonus will be paid if Mr. Thomas voluntarily terminates his employment prior to the completion date, as determined by the Compensation Committee, or if the Company terminates his employment for cause. If the Company terminates Mr. Thomas’ employment without cause, the completion bonus will be considered earned as of his termination date. Mr. Thomas’ outstanding long-term incentive awards granted under the 2011 Plan and the 2015 Plan will continue to be governed by the terms of the applicable stock plan and related award agreement(s). Mr. Thomas is also eligible to receive certain severance benefits provided under his employment agreement to the extent his employment is terminated by the Company without cause, by him for good reason, or due to disability prior to March 31, 2019. Mr. Thomas will not be entitled to severance benefits upon a termination for any other reason or for any termination occurring after March 31, 2019.

As a condition to receipt of the $200,000 completion bonus and the 2019 annual cash incentive bonus, Mr. Thomas has agreed to execute a general waiver and release of claims in favor of the Company and its affiliates. Mr. Thomas also remains subject to the restrictive covenants described in his employment agreement, including covenants concerning confidentiality,non-disparagement, and, for one year following his termination of employment,non-competition andnon-solicitation of customers and employees.

Potential Payments Upon Termination orChange-in-Control

Under their employment agreements and long-term incentive award agreements, our executive officers are entitled to certain severance benefits following termination by us without cause, by the executive as a result of good reason, due to the executive’s disability, due to the executive’s death, and following a “double-trigger”change-in-control. These benefits ensure that our executives are motivated primarily by the needs of our business, rather than circumstances that are outside of the ordinary course of business (such as circumstances that might lead to the termination of an executive’s employment or that might lead to achange-in-control). Severance benefits provide for a level of continued compensation if an executive’s employment is adversely affected in these circumstances, subject to certain conditions. We believe that these benefits enable executives to focus fully on their duties while employed by us, ensure that our executives act in the best interests of our stockholders, even if such actions are otherwise contrary to our executives’ personal interests, and alleviate concerns that may arise in the event of an executive’s separation from service with us. We believe that these severance benefits are in line with current market practices.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 51

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 51


The rights to and level of benefits are determined by the type of termination event. Our executive employment agreements provide for the following cash and other benefits:

 

Termination Event

Severance Benefits

By the Company

Without Cause or

by the Executive
for Good Reason

(1)Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice. At our election, 30 days’ base salary in lieu of allowing the executive to work through any required30-day termination notice period.

(2)Base Salary Continuation.In. In the case of Mr. Knitzer,Beck, an amount equal to two times his salary in effect on the termination date, payable over a period of 24 months following his termination date, and in the case of each other executive, an amount equal to his or her salary in effect on the termination date, payable over a period of 12 months following his termination date.

(3)Average Bonus. In the case of Mr. Knitzer,Beck, an amount equal to two times his average bonus determined as of the termination date, payable over a period of 24 months following his termination date, and in the case of each other executive, an amount equal to his or her average bonus determined as of the termination date, payable over a period of 12 months following his termination date. An executive’s “average bonus” is defined in his or her employment agreement, generally as the average annual bonus paid for the three fiscal years prior to the year of termination or such lesser number of full fiscal years that the executive has been employed. If employment is terminated before the last day of the executive’s first full fiscal year, the average bonus is calculated as the executive’s target bonus.

(4)Annual Incentive Compensation. Thepro-rata portion of any bonus for the year in which termination occurs, to the extent earned, plus, if termination occurs afteryear-end but before the bonus for the preceding year is paid, the bonus for the preceding year.

(5)Health Benefits Continuation Coverage.  Reimbursement of COBRA premiums for continuation coverage under our group medical plan for 24 months (in the case of Mr. Knitzer)Beck) or 12 months (in the case of each other executive) following his or her termination date, so long as he or she is not entitled to obtain insurance from a subsequent employer.

(6)Outplacement Services. Reasonable outplacement service expenses for 24 months (in the case of Mr. Knitzer)Beck) or 12 months (in the case of each other executive) following the termination date, not exceeding $25,000 per year.

“Double-Trigger”

Change-in-Control

For each executive other thanExcluding Mr. Knitzer,Beck, if employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason, and such termination occurs within six months before or one year after the effective date of achange-in-control, then the executive is entitled to the benefits described immediately above, plus the additional benefit that the amounts described in items (2) and (3) will be increased by a factor of 100% (for a total of two times salary and average bonus).

Disability

If employment is terminated due to the executive’s disability, he or she will be entitled to the same benefits as if employment were terminated by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason, except that he or she is not entitled to 30 days’ notice of termination (or payment in lieu thereof). The disability severance benefits will be reduced by the amount of any disability benefits paid to the executive pursuant to any disability insurance, plan, or policy provided by us to or for the benefit of the executive. If any disability benefits paid to an executive pursuant to any disability insurance, plan, or policy provided by us are not subject to local, state, or federal taxation, then our severance obligations in the event of termination due to the executive’s disability will be reduced by an amount equal to the gross taxable amount that we would have been required to pay in order to yield the net,after-tax benefit that the executive actually received pursuant to such disability insurance, plan, or policy.

Death

 

Death

Annual Incentive Compensation. Thepro-rata portion of any bonus for the year in which death occurs, to the extent earned, plus, if death occurs afteryear-end but before the bonus for the preceding year is paid, the bonus for the preceding year, to the extent earned (paid to the executive’s designated beneficiary or estate, as applicable).

Voluntary

Termination

Annual Incentive Compensation. If termination occurs afteryear-end but before the bonus for the preceding year is paid, the bonus for the preceding year, to the extent earned (the executive is not entitled to any bonus for the year during which voluntary termination occurs).

Cause

None.

 

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 52

None.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 52



In addition to the benefits provided for under our executive employment agreements, our long-term incentive award agreements provide for the following treatment of awards following termination:

 

Termination Event

Award Treatment

By the Company Without Cause, by the Executive for Good Reason, Due to Disability, or Due to Death

Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards:Pro-rata accelerated vesting of any unvested shares.

Restricted Stock Awards:Awards:  Pro-rata accelerated vesting of any unvested shares.

Performance-Contingent RSUs: RSUs:  Eligibility to vest in apro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

Cash-Settled Performance Units: Units:  Eligibility to vest in apro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

Performance Restricted Stock Units*:  Eligibility to vest in a pro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

“Double-Trigger”

Change-in-Control

Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards: Awards:  Full accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within six months before or one year after the effective date of achange-in-control.

Restricted Stock Awards: Awards:  Full accelerated vesting in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within six months before or one year after the effective date of achange-in-control.

Performance-Contingent RSUs: RSUs:  Full accelerated vesting at target in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within six months before or one year after the effective date of achange-in-control.

Cash-Settled Performance Units: Units:  Full accelerated vesting at target in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within six months before or one year after the effective date of achange-in-control.

Performance Restricted Stock Units*:  Full accelerated vesting (of the time-based RSUs resulting from the conversion of performance restricted stock units that are earned based upon performance determined at the time of the change in control) in the event of a termination of employment by us without cause or by the executive as a result of good reason within six months before or one year after the effective date of a change in control.

Retirement

Non-Qualified Stock Option Awards: Awards:  Continued vesting as if the executive remained employed.

Restricted Stock AwardsAwards:  Unvested shares are forfeited as of the termination date.

Performance-Contingent RSUs: RSUs:  Eligibility to vest in apro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

Cash-Settled Performance Units: Units:  Eligibility to vest in apro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

Performance Restricted Stock Units*:  Eligibility to vest in a pro-rata portion of the award, subject to actual performance over the full performance period.

An executive is generally eligible for “Retirement” when he or she (i) is 65 or older at the time of termination, or (ii) is 55 or older at the time of termination and has completed ten (10) years of service to Regional.

__________

*      PRSUs are a new element of our long-term incentive program in 2022 and the performance-contingent award that replaced the performance-contingent RSUs and cash settled performance units.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 53


The following table provides information concerning the payments and the value of other benefits that our NEOs would have been eligible to receive if their employment had been terminated under the described circumstances. Our obligation to provide the payments and other benefits described in the table are found in each NEO’s employment agreement and in long-term incentive award agreements, in each case as described above.

In calculating the amounts included in the table below, we have assumed (i) that the termination event and/orchange-in-control occurred on December 31, 2018,2021, (ii) a share price of $24.05$57.46 (our closing share price on December 31, 2018)2021), and (iii) the following:

“Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice”:  We have assumed that we will elect to pay 30 days’ base salary in lieu of allowing the NEO to work through any required30-day termination notice period.

“Severance Payment”:  The amount represents a combination of the “Base Salary Continuation” and “Average Bonus” payments described above.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 53


“Annual Incentive Compensation”:  The amount is based upon the level of performance and percentage payout actually achieved, as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2019.March 2022.

“Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting”:  The value associated with acceleratednon-qualified stock option awards has been calculated by multiplying the number of accelerated shares by the amount by which our stock price as of December 31, 20182021 exceeded (if at all) the exercise price of the option. For any performance-contingent long-term incentive award where vesting remains subject to actual performance over a performance period, (1) we have calculated the value (if any) of awards associated with performance periods ending in 20182021 based on actual performance, and (2) we have ascribed no value to awards associated with performance periods ending after 20182021 because there is no guarantee that we will meet the threshold performance criteria required for these awards to vest and be paid.

“Other Benefits”:  The amount includes reimbursement of COBRA premiums for continuation coverage and the value of outplacement services. We have assumed (1) that the NEO will not become entitled to obtain insurance from a subsequent employer, and (2) that the NEO will receive the maximum value of outplacement services.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 54


 

 

 

 

Termination Event

 

Name

 

Type of Payment or Benefit

 

Termination by the

Company Without

Cause or by the

Executive for

Good Reason

($)

 

 

Termination by the

Company Without

Cause or by the

Executive for Good

Reason in Connection

with a Change in Control

($)

 

 

Termination

Due to Disability

($)

 

 

Termination

Due to Death

($)

 

 

Voluntary

Termination

by the

Executive(1)

($)

 

Robert W. Beck

 

Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice

 

 

52,603

 

 

 

52,603

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance Payment

 

 

3,628,365

 

 

 

3,628,365

 

 

 

3,628,365

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

1,364,160

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)

 

 

1,442,339

 

 

 

6,485,193

 

 

 

1,442,339

 

 

 

1,442,339

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

6,587,467

 

 

 

11,630,321

 

 

 

6,534,864

 

 

 

2,806,499

 

 

 

 

Harpreet Rana

 

Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice

 

 

32,877

 

 

 

32,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance Payment

 

 

968,400

 

 

 

1,936,800

 

 

 

968,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)

 

 

248,755

 

 

 

1,046,841

 

 

 

248,755

 

 

 

248,755

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,843,432

 

 

 

3,609,918

 

 

 

1,810,555

 

 

 

817,155

 

 

 

 

John D. Schachtel

 

Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice

 

 

35,178

 

 

 

35,178

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance Payment

 

 

911,246

 

 

 

1,822,492

 

 

 

911,246

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

 

608,188

 

 

 

608,188

 

 

 

608,188

 

 

 

608,188

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)

 

 

959,973

 

 

 

2,643,084

 

 

 

959,973

 

 

 

959,973

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

40,909

 

 

 

40,909

 

 

 

40,909

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2,555,495

 

 

 

5,149,851

 

 

 

2,520,317

 

 

 

1,568,161

 

 

 

 

Brian J. Fisher

 

Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice

 

 

32,877

 

 

 

32,877

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance Payment

 

 

833,817

 

 

 

1,667,633

 

 

 

833,817

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

568,400

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)

 

 

701,099

 

 

 

2,214,420

 

 

 

701,099

 

 

 

701,099

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

30,971

 

 

 

30,971

 

 

 

30,971

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2,167,164

 

 

 

4,514,301

 

 

 

2,134,287

 

 

 

1,269,499

 

 

 

 

Manish Parmar

 

Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice

 

 

28,932

 

 

 

28,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance Payment

 

 

852,192

 

 

 

1,704,384

 

 

 

852,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annual Incentive Compensation

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

500,192

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)

 

 

447,220

 

 

 

1,902,604

 

 

 

447,220

 

 

 

447,220

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Benefits

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

1,853,536

 

 

 

4,161,112

 

 

 

1,824,604

 

 

 

947,412

 

 

 

 

 

    Termination Event

Name

 

Type of Payment or Benefit

 Termination by
the Company
Without Cause or
by the Executive
for Good Reason

($)
 Termination by
the Company
Without Cause or
by the Executive
for Good Reason
in Connection
with a Change in
Control

($)
 Termination
Due to
      Disability      

($)
 Termination
Due to Death
($)
 Voluntary
Termination by
the Executive(1)

($)

Peter R. Knitzer

 Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice 45,205 45,205 ��  
 Severance Payment 2,170,930 2,170,930 2,170,930  
 Annual Incentive Compensation 548,350 548,350 548,350 548,350 
 Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2)  3,450,551   
 Other Benefits 50,000 50,000 50,000  
       Total 2,814,485 6,265,036 2,769,280 548,350 

John D. Schachtel

 Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice 29,589 29,589   
 Severance Payment 718,920 1,437,840 718,920  
 Annual Incentive Compensation 358,920 358,920 358,920 358,920 
 Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2) 34,231 564,839 34,231 34,231 
 Other Benefits 40,679 40,679 40,679  
       Total 1,182,339 2,431,867 1,152,750 393,151 

Donald E. Thomas

 Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice 29,178 29,178   
 Severance Payment 668,805 1,337,610 668,805  
 Annual Incentive Compensation 353,935 353,935 353,935 353,935 
 Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2) 482,343 1,130,849 482,343 482,343 
 Other Benefits 37,469 37,469 37,469  
       Total 1,571,730 2,889,041 1,542,552 836,278 

Daniel J. Taggart

 Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice 27,123 27,123   
 Severance Payment 621,578 1,243,156 621,578  
 Annual Incentive Compensation 329,010 329,010 329,010 329,010 
 Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2) 298,340 700,340 298,340 298,340 
 Other Benefits 43,453 43,453 43,453  
       Total 1,319,504 2,343,082 1,292,381 627,350 

Brian J. Fisher

 Payment in Lieu of 30 Days’ Notice 24,658 24,658   
 Severance Payment 513,255 1,026,510 513,255  
 Annual Incentive Compensation 299,100 299,100 299,100 299,100 
 Long-Term Incentive Award Vesting(2) 276,648 604,189 276,648 276,648 
 Other Benefits 33,634 33,634 33,634  
       Total 1,147,295 1,988,091 1,122,637 575,748 

(1)

A voluntary termination that is treated as a “retirement” may result inpro-rata or continued vesting of certain long-term incentive awards. None of our NEOs were eligible for “retirement” as of December 31, 2018.2021.

(2)

See “Executive Compensation Tables – Outstanding Equity Awards at FiscalYear-End” for a summary of equity-based long-term incentive awards outstanding as of December 31, 2018.2021. As of December 31, 2018,2021, in addition to equity-based long-term incentive awards, Mr. Beck, Ms. Rana, and Messrs. Knitzer, Schachtel, Thomas, Taggart,Fisher, and FisherParmar held one or more

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 54


cash-settled performance unit awards having an aggregate target value of $1,683,333; $275,000; $514,500; $318,667;$960,000; $166,250; $466,125; $368,750; and $275,833,$257,625, respectively.

The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided generally to all salaried employees upon termination of employment and do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of our NEOs. Because the amounts in the table are calculated subject to the assumptions provided and on the basis of the occurrence of a termination as of a particular date and under a particular set of circumstances, the actual amount to be paid to each of our NEOs upon a termination or change in control may vary significantly from the amounts included in the table. Factors that could affect these amounts include the timing during the year of the termination event and the type of termination event that occurs.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 55

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 55


SUMMARY OF COMPANY INCENTIVE PLANSSummary of Company Incentive Plans

The discussion that follows describes certain material terms of our principal long-term incentive plans and our principal cash incentive plan.

Long-Term Incentive Plans

2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan

The 2015 Plan became effective April 22, 2015, and was last amended and restated effective April 27, 2017.May 20, 2021. The 2015 Plan was further amended February 17, 2022 to allow for future performance awards to vest based upon the attainment of actual performance following the occurrence of a double-trigger change in control event, unless an individual award agreement provides otherwise. The purposes of the 2015 Plan are (i) to encourage and enable selected employees, directors, and consultants to acquire or increase their holdings of our common stock and other equity-based interests and/or to provide other incentive awards in order to promote a closer identification of their interests with our interests and those of our stockholders, and (ii) to provide us with flexibility to motivate, attract, and retain the services of participants upon whose judgment, interest, and special effort the successful conduct of our operation largely depends. Awards granted under the 2015 Plan may be in the form of incentive ornon-qualified stock options, SARs (including related or freestanding SARs), RSAs, RSU awards, performance share awards, performance unit awards, phantom stock awards, other stock-based awards, and/or dividend equivalent awards. Awards may be granted under the 2015 Plan until April 21, 2025 or the plan’s earlier termination by the Board.

The 2015 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, subject to Board oversight. The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that we may issue pursuant to awards granted under the 2015 Plan may not exceed the sum of (i) 1,550,0002,600,000 shares, plus (ii) any shares (A) remaining available for grant as of the effective date of the 2015 Plan under any prior plan and/or (B) subject to an award granted under a prior plan, which award is forfeited, canceled, terminated, expires, or lapses for any reason without the issuance of shares or pursuant to which such shares are forfeited. In addition, shares subject to certain awards will again be available for issuance (or otherwise not counted against the maximum number of available shares) under the 2015 Plan, including unissued or forfeited shares subject to awards that are canceled, terminate, expire, are forfeited, or lapse for any reason; awards settled in cash; dividends (including dividends paid in shares) or dividend equivalents paid in cash in connection with outstanding awards; and shares subject to an award other than an option or SAR that are not issued for any reason (including failure to achieve maximum performance criteria). Further, the following will not reduce the maximum number of shares available under the 2015 Plan: (i) shares issued under the 2015 Plan through the settlement, assumption, or substitution of outstanding awards granted by another entity or obligations to grant future awards in connection with a merger or similar transaction that involves our acquisition of another entity, and (ii) available shares under a shareholder approved plan of an acquired company (as adjusted to reflect the transaction) that are used for awards under the 2015 Plan, in each case, subject to NYSE listing requirements.

The maximum aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2015 Plan pursuant to the grant of incentive options may not exceed 1,550,000 shares. Further, under the 2015 Plan, in any12-month period, (i) no participant may be granted options and SARs that are not related to an option for more than 450,000 shares of common stock (or the equivalent value thereof based on the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date of grant of an award); (ii) no participant may be granted awards other than options or SARs that are settled in shares of common stock for more than 450,000 shares of common stock; and (iii) the maximum amount of awards that are settled in cash that can be granted to any one participant is $2,500,000. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to awards granted during any12-month period to anon-employee director, taken together with any cash fees paid during such12-month period to suchnon-employee director in respect of Board service, may not exceed $600,000 in total value (calculating the value of any such awards based on the fair market value per share of common stock on the grant date of such award).

The number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan, the participant award limitations, and the terms of awards may also be adjusted in the event of an adjustment in our capital structure (due to a merger, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, or similar event).

2011 Stock Incentive Plan

The 2011 Plan provides for the issuance of a maximum of 950,000 shares of common stock pursuant to awards granted under the plan. Awards may include incentive ornon-qualified stock options, SARs (including related or freestanding SARs), other stock-based awards (including shares of common stock, restricted shares, RSUs, and awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based on, the fair market

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 56


value of our common stock), and/or performance-based awards to our and our subsidiaries’ key employees, directors, or other service providers. The number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan and the terms of awards may be adjusted upon certain events affecting our capitalization. The 2011 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee and was replaced by the 2015 Plan. Awards may no longer be granted under the 2011 Plan, and any shares that remained available for grant have been rolled over to the 2015 Plan. However, awards that remain outstanding under the 2011 Plan will continue in accordance with their respective terms.

Annual Incentive Plan

The Annual Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee and provides for the payment of incentive bonuses based on the attainment of performance objectives in the form of cash or, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, in awards of shares under the 2015 Plan. The purpose of the Annual Incentive Plan is to enable us to attract, retain, motivate, and reward selected officers and other employees by providing them with the opportunity to earn annual incentive compensation awards based on the attainment of certain performance objectives. The Compensation Committee will establish the performance periods over which performance objectives will be measured. A performance period may be for a fiscal year or a shorter period, as determined by the Compensation Committee, and performance periods may overlap. For a given performance

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 56


period, the Compensation Committee will establish (i) the performance objective or objectives that must be achieved for a participant to be eligible to receive a bonus for such performance period, and (ii) the target incentive bonus for each participant. The Compensation Committee may adjust awards as appropriate for partial achievement of goals or other factors, and may interpret and make necessary and appropriate adjustments to performance goals and the manner in which goals are evaluated.The Compensation Committee has absolute discretion to reduce or eliminate the amount of an award granted to a participant, including an award otherwise earned and payable under the Annual Incentive Plan, and to establish rules or procedures that have the effect of limiting the amount payable to each participant to an amount that is less than the maximum amount otherwise authorized as that participant’s target incentive bonus. No participant may receive a bonus under the Annual Incentive Plan, with respect to any fiscal year, in excess of $2,500,000.


Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 57


 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 57


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Stockholder Proposals

We are seeking stockholder action on the following three proposals, which are described in greater detail below:

 

1.

1.

The election of the eightnine nominees named in this Proxy Statement to serve as members of the Board until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified;

 

2.

2.

The ratification of the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019;2022; and

 

3.

3.

The approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation.

Proposal No. 1:  Election of Directors

Our Bylaws currently provide that the number of directors of the Company shall be fixed from time to time by resolution adopted by the Board. There are presently eightnine directors.

The Nominating Committee evaluates the size and composition of the Board on at least an annual basis. In connection therewith, the Nominating Committee has nominated and recommends for election as directors the following eightnine nominees: Philip V. Bancroft, Robert W. Beck, Jonathan D. Brown, Roel C. Campos, Maria Contreras-Sweet, Michael R. Dunn, Steven J. Freiberg, Peter R. Knitzer, Alvaro G. de Molina,Sandra K. Johnson, and Carlos Palomares. Each nominee presently serves as a director. Directors shall be elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors are elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation, removal, or death.

A candidate for election as a director is nominated to stand for election based on his or her professional experience, recognized achievements in his or her respective fields, an ability to contribute to some aspect of our business, and the willingness to make the commitment of time and effort required of a director. A description of the background, business experience, skills, qualifications, attributes, and certain other information with respect to each of the nominees for election to the Board can be found above in the “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance Matters” section of this Proxy Statement. Each of the above-listed nominees has been identified as possessing an appropriate diversity of background and experience, good judgment, deep knowledge of our industry, strength of character, and an independent mind, as well as a reputation for integrity and high personal and professional ethics. Each nominee also brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board, as a whole, competence and experience in a wide variety of areas.

In selecting this slate of nominees for 2019,2022, the Nominating Committee specifically considered the background and business experience of each of the nominees, along with the familiarity of the nominees with our business and prospects, which has been developed as a result of their service on our Board. The Nominating Committee believes that such familiarity will be helpful in addressing the opportunities and challenges that we face in the current business environment.

Each of the eightnine nominees has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve as a director, if elected. In the event that any nominee withdraws, or for any reason is unable to serve as a director, the proxies will be voted for such other person as may be designated by the Nominating Committee as a substitute nominee, but in no event will proxies be voted for more than eightnine nominees. The Nominating Committee has no reason to believe that any nominee will not continue to be a candidate or will not serve if elected.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees listed above.

Proposal No. 2:  Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

RSM US LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2007. The Audit Committee has selected RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019,2022, and the Audit Committee and the Board recommend that the stockholders ratify the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2019.2022.

A representative of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP plans to be present atattend the virtual Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Although ratification is not required, the Board is submitting the appointment of RSM USDeloitte & Touche LLP to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will consider whether to appoint another independent registered public accounting firm.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 58
The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 58


Change in Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

As disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 2, 2021, on October 27, 2021, the Company notified RSM US LLP of its dismissal as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm effective upon the completion of RSM US LLP’s audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021. The Audit Committee approved the dismissal of RSM US LLP pursuant to authority specified in its charter following consideration of a competitive proposal process conducted in the second half of 2021.

Neither of the audit reports of RSM US LLP on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020 contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, and neither such audit report was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there were: (i) no disagreements (as that term is defined in Item 304 of Regulation S-K) between the Company and RSM US LLP on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of RSM US LLP, would have caused RSM US LLP to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement in connection with its reports; and (ii) no events reportable pursuant to Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

As disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 2, 2021, on October 27, 2021, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s new independent registered public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2022, subject to completion of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s standard client acceptance procedures and execution of an engagement letter. The Audit Committee approved Deloitte & Touche LLP’s engagement pursuant to authority specified in its charter.

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2020, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf has consulted with Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specific transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, and neither a written report nor oral advice was provided to the Company that Deloitte & Touche LLP concluded was an important factor considered in reaching a decision as to any accounting, auditing, or financial reporting issue; (ii) any matter that was the subject of a disagreement within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-K and the related instructions; or (iii) any reportable event within the meaning of Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

A representative of RSM US LLP plans to attend the virtual Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us by RSM US LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm RSM US LLP, during the fiscal years ended December 31, 20182021 and 2017.2020.

  Year Ended
December 31, 2018
 Year Ended
December 31, 2017
 

 

Year Ended

December 31, 2021

 

 

Year Ended

December 31, 2020

 

Audit Fees

  

$

856,843    

 

 

$

702,990    

 

 

$

1,244,428

 

 

$

894,826

 

Audit-Related Fees

  

 

8,400    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

13,910

 

 

 

40,125

 

Tax Fees

  

 

170,114    

 

 

 

202,101    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

  

 

��    

 

 

 

—    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

  

 

 

Total

  

$

            1,035,357    

 

 

$

                905,091     

 

 

$

1,258,338

 

 

$

934,951

 

  

 

  

 

 

In the above table, in accordance with applicable SEC rules:

“Audit Fees” are fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, review of consolidated financial statements included in our Forms10-Q, and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

“Audit-Related Fees” are fees billed for assurance and related services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements that are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” In 2018,2021 and 2020, these fees were for attest services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm related to financial reporting that are not required by statute or regulation.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for accounting consultation services. There were no such fees incurred in 2017.2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 59


Tax Fees” are fees billed for professional services rendered by the independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. In 2018, theseThere were no such fees were for services performed for the filing of our 2017 tax returns and estimated payments for 2018. In 2017, these fees were for services performed for the filing of our 2016 tax returns and estimated payments for 2017.incurred in 2021 or 2020.

“All Other Fees” represent fees billed for ancillary professional services that are not reported above under “Audit Fees,” “Audit Related“Audit-Related Fees,” or “Tax Fees.” There were no such fees incurred in 20182021 or 2017.2020.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

It is the policy of the Audit Committee topre-approve all audit and permittednon-audit services proposed to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee reviewed andpre-approved all of the services performed by RSM US LLP.LLP during 2021. The process for suchpre-approval is typically as follows: Audit Committeepre-approval is sought at one of the Audit Committee’s regularly scheduled meetings following the presentation of information at such meeting detailing the particular services proposed to be performed. The authority topre-approvenon-audit pre-approve audit and non-audit services may be delegated by the Audit Committee to the Chair of the Audit Committee, who shall present any decision topre-approve an activity to the full Audit Committee at the first regular meeting following such decision. None of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the exception provided by Rule2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) under RegulationS-X.

The Audit Committee has reviewed thenon-audit services provided by RSM US LLP and has determined that the provision of such services is compatible with maintaining RSM US LLP’s independence.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 59


Proposal No. 3:  Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, our stockholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the narrative disclosures that accompany the compensation tables in this Proxy Statement (a “Say-on-Pay Vote Vote”). Taking into consideration the most recent voting results from our 2018 annual stockholders’ meeting concerning the frequency of theSay-on-Pay Vote, we determined that we will hold an annual advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers until the next required advisory vote on the frequency of such votes.

The Compensation Committee oversees the development of a compensation program designed to attract, retain, and motivate executives who enable us to achieve our strategic and financial goals. The Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative disclosure illustrate the trends in compensation and the application of our compensation philosophies and practices for the years presented. We encourage stockholders to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, which describes the details of our executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2018.2021.  

The Compensation Committee believes that our executive compensation program achieves an appropriate balance between fixed compensation and variable incentive compensation, pays for performance, and promotes an alignment between the interests of our named executive officers and our stockholders. Accordingly, we are asking our stockholders to vote at“FOR” the Annual Meeting “FOR” thenon-binding advisory resolution approving the compensation of our named executive officers, including as described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative discussion.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon us, the Compensation Committee, or the Board. However, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the opinions of our stockholders and will take the outcome of the vote into account when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the advisory vote to approveapproval of the compensation of our named executive officers.


Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 60


 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 60


OTHER INFORMATION

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee oversees our financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter, a copy of which is available on our Investor Relations website,www.regionalmanagement.com. This report reviews the actions taken by the Audit Committee with regard to our financial reporting process during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, and particularly with regard to the audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20182021 and 20172020 and for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2021, 2020, and 2016.2019.

The Audit Committee is composed solely of independent directors under existing NYSE listing standards and SEC requirements. None of the committee members is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or any of our subsidiaries or has engaged in any business transaction or has any business or family relationship with the Company or any of our subsidiaries or affiliates. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Philip V. Bancroft, Steven J. Freiberg, Alvaro G. de Molina, and Carlos Palomares are “audit committee financial experts,” as defined by SEC rules.

Our management has the primary responsibility for our financial statements and reporting process, including the systems of internal controls. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes and to select annually the accountants to serve as our independent auditors for the coming year. The Audit Committee has implemented procedures to ensure that during the course of each fiscal year it devotes the attention that it deems necessary or appropriate to fulfill its oversight responsibilities under the Audit Committee’s charter. To carry out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee met fivesix times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.2021.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, including a discussion of the quality, rather than just the acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee also discussed our audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, with the independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, their judgments as to the quality, rather than just the acceptability, of our accounting principles, and such otherhas discussed with the independent auditors the matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee underby the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB Standards”) and SEC Rule2-07 of RegulationS-X.the SEC. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the auditors their independence from management and the Company, including the matters in the written disclosures and the letter required by the PCAOB regarding the independent auditors’ communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence. The Audit Committee also considered whether the provision of services during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, by the auditors that were unrelated to their audit of the consolidated financial statements referred to above and to their reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements during the fiscal year is compatible with maintaining their independence.

Additionally, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the overall scope and plan for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examination, their evaluation of our internal controls, and the overall quality of our financial reporting.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018,2021, for filing with the SEC. This report of the Audit Committee has been prepared by members of the Audit Committee.

Members of the Audit Committee:

Carlos PalomaresRoel C. Campos (Chair)

Philip V. Bancroft

Steven J. Freiberg

Alvaro G. de MolinaCarlos Palomares

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 61

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 61



SecuritySecurity Ownership of Certain BeneficialBeneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of the close of trading on March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, of: (i) each person known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of our common stock; (ii) each of our directors; (iii) each of our named executive officers; and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers, as a group. For purposes of the following and the accompanying footnotes, references to “executive officers” include our named executive officers.

 

     Shares Beneficially
Owned(1)

Name

              Number                          Percentage            

 

 

Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C.(2)

   1,529,713  12.9%

 

 

Wellington Management Group LLP and affiliates(3)

   1,167,332  9.8%

 

 

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

   991,497  8.3%

 

 

BlackRock, Inc.(5)

   945,960  8.0%

 

 

Gregory L. Summe(6)

   616,761  5.2%

 

 

Jonathan D. Brown(7)

   3,407    *

 

 

Roel C. Campos(8)

   63,293    *

 

 

Maria Contreras-Sweet

   3,750    *

 

 

Michael R. Dunn(9)

   261,003  2.2%

 

 

Steven J. Freiberg(10)

   159,473  1.3%

 

 

Alvaro G. de Molina(11)

   60,297    *

 

 

Carlos Palomares(12)

   60,646    *

 

 

Peter R. Knitzer(13)

   183,331  1.5%

 

 

John D. Schachtel(14)

   34,019    *

 

 

Donald E. Thomas(15)

   252,679  2.1%

 

 

Daniel J. Taggart(16)

   47,478    *

 

 

Brian J. Fisher(17)

   66,652    *

 

 

All directors and executive officers, as a group (12 persons)

  1,196,028  9.5%

 

 

Shares Beneficially Owned(1)

Name

 

Number

 

Percentage

Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C.(2)

 

1,179,870

 

12.1%

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

 

890,018

 

9.1%

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

 

838,764

 

8.6%

Wellington Management Group LLP and affiliates(5)

 

630,267

 

6.4%

Philip V. Bancroft

 

697

 

*

Jonathan D. Brown(6)

 

15,254

 

*

Roel C. Campos(7)

 

102,005

 

*

Maria Contreras-Sweet

 

17,865

 

*

Michael R. Dunn

 

95,761

 

*

Steven J. Freiberg(8)

 

172,129

 

1.8%

Sandra K. Johnson

 

6,684

 

*

Carlos Palomares(9)

 

58,071

 

*

Robert W. Beck(10)

 

144,767

 

1.5%

Harpreet Rana(11)

 

18,548

 

*

John D. Schachtel(12)

 

108,067

 

1.1%

Brian J. Fisher(13)

 

90,827

 

*

Manish Parmar(14)

 

33,958

 

*

All directors and executive officers, as a group (14 persons)

 

899,772

 

8.9%

 

*

Amount represents less than 1.0%

(1)

Applicable percentage of ownership is based upon 11,881,6589,790,219 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 21, 2019.April 4, 2022. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC rules and includes voting and investment power with respect to shares shown as beneficially owned. Shares of common stock subject to options currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are deemed outstanding for computing the shares and percentage ownership of the person holding such options, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons or entities listed in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by them. The address for all directors and officers listed in the table is c/o Regional Management Corp., 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South CarolinaSC 29651.

(2)

The information reported is based on a Form 4 filed with the SEC on January 3, 2019,February 18, 2022, reporting (i) shared power of Basswood Capital Management, L.L.C. (“Basswood”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,529,7131,179,870 shares; (ii) shared power of Basswood Opportunity Partners, L.L.C.LP (“BOP”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 236,899183,386 shares; (iii) shared power of Basswood Opportunity Fund, Inc. (“BOF”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 30,1233,288 shares; (iv) shared power of Basswood Financial Fund, LP (“BFF”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 91,07671,356 shares; (v) shared power of Basswood Financial Long Only Fund, Inc.LP (“BFF, Inc.BFLOF”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 87,39933,880 shares; (vi) shared power of Basswood, Financial Long Only Fund, LP (“BLOFBOP, BOF, BFF, and BFLOF (collectively, the “Managed Accounts”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 24,548872,706 shares; (vii) shared power of Basswood Enhanced Long Short Fund, L.P. (“BELS”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 567,680 shares; (viii) shared power of Basswood, BFF, BOF, BLOF, BFF, Inc., BELS, and BOP (collectively, the “Funds and Managed Accounts”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 488,581 shares; (ix) shared power of Matthew Lindenbaum to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 1,529,7131,179,870 shares; and (x)(viii) shared power of Bennett Lindenbaum to vote or direct the vote and to dispose of or direct the disposition of 1,529,7131,179,870 shares. Matthew Lindenbaum and Bennett Lindenbaum are the Managing Members of Basswood and may be deemed to have a pecuniary interest in the shares held directly

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 62


or indirectly by the Funds and Managed Accounts. The information also includes 3,40715,254 shares held by Mr. Brown, a partner at Basswood, who serves on the Board pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement described in detail below in the section entitled “Other Information – Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” As a result, Basswood is a“director-by-deputization” “director-by-deputization” solely for the purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to Rule16a-1 of the Exchange Act, Basswood may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the shares of common stock issued to Mr. Brown. The business address of Basswood is 645 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor, New York, NY 10022.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 62


(3)

The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 7, 2022, reporting the sole power of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) to vote or direct the vote of 816,181 shares and the sole power of BlackRock to dispose or direct the disposition of 890,018 shares.  The business address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(4)

The information reported is based on two Schedulesa Schedule 13G/A each filed with the SEC on February 12, 2019,8, 2022, reporting the sole power of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”) to vote or direct the vote of 822,815 shares and the sole power of Dimensional to dispose or direct the disposition of 838,764 shares. The business address of Dimensional is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, TX 78746.

(5)

The information reported is based on Schedules 13G/A, filed with the SEC on February 4, 2022 reporting: (i) shared power of Wellington Management Group LLP (“WMG”) to vote or direct the vote of 612,149 shares and to dispose or direct the disposition of 630,267 shares; (ii) shared power of Wellington Group Holdings LLP (“WGH”) to vote or direct the vote of 612,149 shares and to dispose or direct the disposition of 630,267 shares; (iii) shared power of Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (“WIAH”) to vote or direct the vote of 612,149 shares and to dispose or direct the disposition of 630,267 shares; (iv) shared power of Wellington Management Company LLP (“WMC”) to vote or direct the vote of 597,849 shares and to dispose or direct the disposition of 615,967 shares; and (v) shared power of Wellington Trust Company, NA (“WTC”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,167,332 shares; (ii) shared power of Wellington Group Holdings LLP (“WGH”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,167,332 shares; (iii) shared power of Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings LLP (“WIAH”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,167,332 shares; (iv) shared power of Wellington Management Company LLP (“WMC”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,141,378 shares; and (v) shared power of Wellington Trust Company, NA (“WTC”) to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 1,048,544597,849 shares. The business address of WMG, WGH, WIAH, WMC, and WTC is 280 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02210.

(4)

The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 8, 2019, reporting the sole power of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (“Dimensional”) to vote or direct the vote of 947,030 shares and the sole power of Dimensional to dispose or direct the disposition of 991,497 shares. The business address of Dimensional is Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, TX 78746.(6)

(5)

The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 6, 2019, reporting the sole power of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) to vote or direct the vote of 854,991 shares and the sole power of BlackRock to dispose or direct the disposition of 945,960 shares. The business address of BlackRock is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(6)

The information reported is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, reporting the shared power of Gregory L. Summe to vote or direct the vote and to dispose or direct the disposition of 616,761 shares. This number includes shares held by members of Mr. Summe’s family where he shares voting and investment control. Mr. Summe is the sole member of Glen Capital Partners LLC and Glen Capital Partners GP LLC, which is the general partner of Glen Capital Partners Focus Fund, L.P. These entities each report shared power to vote or direct the vote or dispose or direct the disposition of 552,400 shares. The business address of Mr. Summe is 75 Arlington St., Suite 500, Boston, MA 02116.

(7)

Mr. Brown is a partner at Basswood, serving on the Board pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement described in detail below in the section entitled “Other Information – Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions.” As a result, Basswood is a“director-by-deputization” “director-by-deputization” solely for the purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act. Pursuant to Rule16a-1 of the Exchange Act, Basswood may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the shares of common stock issued to Mr. Brown.

(8)

(7)

The amount stated includes 28,67014,670 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Campos will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Campos and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(9)

The amount stated includes 148,866 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019, over which Mr. Dunn will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Dunn and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.(8)

(10)

Mr. Freiberg holds 86,678101,740 shares directly. Additional shares stated are owned by (i) Neena Freiberg (Mr. Freiberg’s wife) (30,000 shares), and (ii) the Neena Freiberg Irrevocable Trust, of which Mr. Freiberg is trustee (24,854(22,448 shares). The amount stated also includes 17,941 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Freiberg will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Freiberg and by

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 63


directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(11)

(9)

The amount stated includes 30,16618,670 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019, over which Mr. de Molina will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. de Molina and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(12)

The amount stated includes 28,670 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Palomares will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Palomares and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(13)

(10)

The amount stated includes 146,89876,595 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Mr. KnitzerBeck will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. KnitzerBeck and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(14)

(11)

The amount stated includes 20,6415,790 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Ms. Rana will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Ms. Rana and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 63


(12)

The amount stated includes 66,434 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Schachtel will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Schachtel and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(15)

(13)

The amount stated includes 11,843 shares owned by The Donald Eugene Thomas and Jeanine Leigh Thomas Joint Revocable Living Trust. Mr. Thomas and his wife, Jeanine Leigh Thomas, are the trustees of The Donald Eugene Thomas and Jeanine Leigh Thomas Joint Revocable Living Trust. The amount stated also includes 240,83657,799 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019, over which Mr. Thomas will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Thomas and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(16)

The amount stated includes 37,293 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019, over which Mr. Taggart will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Taggart and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(17)

The amount stated includes 55,300 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 21, 2019,April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Fisher will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Fisher and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

(14)

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement

The amount stated includes 11,182 shares subject to options either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of April 4, 2022, over which Mr. Parmar will not have voting or investment power until the options are exercised. The option shares described in this footnote are considered outstanding for 2019 Annual Meeting |

 64the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock owned by Mr. Parmar and by directors and executive officers as a group, but not for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.


Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Our directors, executive officers, and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to directors, executive officers, and greater than ten percent beneficial owners were timely complied with by such persons.

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions

Cooperation Agreement

On January 26, 2018, we entered into a Cooperation Agreement (the “Cooperation Agreement”) with Basswood, pursuant to which we appointed Jonathan D. Brown to the Board, effective January 26, 2018.

Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, Mr. Brown is required to, at all times while serving as a member of the Board, comply with all policies, procedures, processes, codes, rules, standards, and guidelines applicable tonon-employee Board members. In addition, the Cooperation Agreement provides that Mr. Brown must offer to resign from the Board if (i) Basswood and its affiliates, collectively, no longer beneficially own an aggregate “net long position” of at least 874,705 shares of our common stock (subject to adjustment for stock splits, reverse stock splits, stock dividends, and similar adjustments), or (ii) Basswood fails to comply with or breaches any of the terms of the Cooperation Agreement in any material respect and, if capable of being cured, such material breach or failure has not been cured within 15 days after receipt by Basswood of written notice from us specifying such material breach or failure, provided that we are not in material breach of the Cooperation Agreement at such time. The Cooperation Agreement also provides that, if requested by Basswood, we are obligated to appoint Mr. Brown to any existing or newly created committee of the Board that may be designated to oversee or review strategic alternatives (including an extraordinary transaction).

In the Cooperation Agreement, in addition to certain confidentiality andnon-disparagement provisions, Basswood has agreed to various customary standstill provisions for the duration of the Standstill Period (as defined below), which provide, among other things, that Basswood and its affiliates will not (i) acquire beneficial ownership of 19.9% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock; (ii) participate in a proxy solicitation with respect to the voting of any shares of our common stock; (iii) submit a proposal for or offer of any extraordinary transaction or propose a change in the structure, size, or composition of the Board or executive officers of the Company; or (iv) subject to certain exceptions for open market and underwritten transactions, sell shares of our common stock to a third party or group that to Basswood’s knowledge would result in such third party or group owning 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Basswood has also agreed that, during the Standstill Period, it shall cause the shares of our common stock beneficially owned by it and its affiliates to be voted (i) in favor of each director nominated by the Board for election, and (ii) in accordance with the Board’s recommendations on all other matters; provided that Basswood and its affiliates may vote their shares of our common stock in their sole discretion with respect to (a) a proposal to authorize or approve an extraordinary transaction, (b) matters related to the implementation of takeover defenses, (c) new or amended incentive compensation plans submitted for stockholder approval, or (d) any other proposal if either Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. or Glass Lewis & Co., LLC do not recommend voting in accordance with the Board’s recommendation with respect to such proposal (other than with respect to the election or removal of directors) at any annual or special meeting of stockholders.

Pursuant to the Cooperation Agreement, the “Standstill Period” was initially defined to mean the period commencing on January 26, 2018 and ending on the earliest of (i) 12:01 a.m. (New York time) on the date that is 20 days prior to the nomination deadline for the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders (the “2019 Annual Meeting”), (ii) if we fail to comply with or breach any of the terms of the Cooperation Agreement in any material respect and, if capable of being cured, such material breach or failure has not been cured within 15 days after receipt by us of written notice from Basswood specifying such material breach or failure, provided that Basswood is not in material breach of the Cooperation Agreement at such time, (iii) the consummation of an extraordinary

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 64


transaction following which consummation the director designated by Basswood no longer serves on the Board, and (iv) a reorganization of the Company under any federal or state law relating to bankruptcy or insolvency. However, as permitted by the terms of the Cooperation Agreement we

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 65


provided timely written notice to Basswoodprovides that we would nominate a director designated by Basswood for election to the Board at the 2019 Annual Meeting, which extended the Standstill Period until the date that is 20 days prior to the nomination deadline for the 2020 Annual Meeting. Ifif we provide written notice to Basswood that we will nominate a director designated by Basswood for election to the Board at the 20202019 Annual Meeting or for any annual meeting of stockholders of the Company subsequent thereto (each, an “Applicable Meeting”) at least 20 days prior to the nomination deadline for such Applicable Meeting and Basswood has agreed in advance to such nomination, then the Standstill Period will be automatically extended further until the date that is 20 days prior to the nomination deadline for the annual stockholders meeting subsequent to such Applicable Meeting.Accordingly, we have provided timely written notice to Basswood that we would nominate a director designated by Basswood for election to the Board at each Applicable Meeting to date, which currently has extended the Standstill Period until the date that is 20 days prior to the nomination deadline for the 2023 Annual Meeting.

The Cooperation Agreement terminates upon the expiration of the Standstill Period (subject to any extensions as provided in the Cooperation Agreement), provided that the confidentiality provisions of the Cooperation Agreement will survive for a period of 18 months following the date upon which no director designated by Basswood serves as a director of the Company.

Statement of Policy Regarding Transactions with Related Persons

Our Board has adopted a written statement of policy regarding transactions with related persons, which we refer to as our “related person policy.” Our related person policy requires that a “related person” (as defined in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of RegulationS-K) must promptly disclose to our general counsel, or other person designated by our Board, any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated and would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of RegulationS-K, which includes transactions in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The general counsel, or such other person, will then promptly communicate that information to our Board.Board or the Audit Committee. No related person transaction will be executed without the approval or ratification of our Board or a committee of the Board.Audit Committee. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote of a related person transaction in which they have an interest and provide all material information he or she has concerning the related person transaction to the Board.Audit Committee. Our policy does not specify the standards to be applied by directors in determining whether or not to approve or ratify a related person transaction, and we accordingly anticipate that these determinations will be made in accordance with principles of Delaware law generally applicable to directors of a Delaware corporation. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related person transaction, the Board may consider such facts and circumstances as it deems appropriate, including (1) the benefits to us; (2) the availability of other sources for comparable products or services; (3) the terms of the proposed related person transaction; and (4) the terms available to unrelated third parties or to employees generally in an arms-length negotiation.

Indemnification of Directors Officers, and Certain Current and Former StockholdersOfficers

Our Bylaws provide that we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). In addition, our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that our directors will not be liable for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL. Further, in connection with the September 2013 and December 2013 secondary public offerings described above, we agreed to indemnify Palladium, Parallel, and certain other selling stockholders for certain losses, claims, damages, liabilities, and expenses arising out of such secondary public offerings.

There is no pending litigation or proceeding naming any of our directors or officers to which indemnification is being sought, and we are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation that may result in claims for indemnification by any director, officer, or other party.

Proposals by Stockholders

Under certain conditions, stockholders may request that we include a proposal at a forthcoming meeting of our stockholders in our proxy materials for such meeting. Under SEC Rule14a-8, any stockholder desiring to present such a proposal to be acted upon at the 20202023 Annual Meeting and included in the proxy materials for such meeting must ensure that we receive the proposal at our principal executive office in Greer, South Carolina by November 28, 2019,December 14, 2022, in order for the proposal to be eligible for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy card relating to such meeting.

If a stockholder desires to propose any business at an annual meeting of stockholders, even if the proposal or proposed director candidate is not to be included in our proxy statement, our Bylaws provide that the stockholder

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 66


must deliver or mail timely advance written notice of such business to our principal executive office. Under our Bylaws, to be timely, a stockholder’s notice generally must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices not later than the 90th day before the first anniversary of the date of the preceding year’s annual meeting and not earlier than the 120th day prior to such anniversary. However, in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 20 days or delayed by more than 70 days from such anniversary date, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Each item of business must be made in accordance

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 65


with, and must include the information required by, our Bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and any other applicable law, rule, or regulation. Assuming that the date of the 20202023 Annual Meeting is not advanced or delayed in the manner described above, the required notice for the 20202023 Annual Meeting would need to be provided to us not earlier than December 27, 2019January 19, 2023 and not later than January 26, 2020.February 18, 2023.

If, following the filing and delivery of these proxy materials, the date of the 2020 Annual Meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 20 calendar days from theone-year anniversary date of the 2019 Annual Meeting, we will, in a timely manner, provide notice to our stockholders of the new date of the 2020 Annual Meeting and the new dates by which stockholder proposals submitted both pursuant to and outside of SEC Rule14a-8 must be received by us. Such notice will be included in the earliest possible Quarterly Report on Form10-Q under Part II, Item 5.

Householding of Annual Meeting Materials

Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” annual reports and proxy statements. This means that only one copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K and Proxy Statement, as applicable, may have been sent to multiple stockholders in the same household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of our Annual Report on Form10-K and Proxy Statement, as applicable, to any stockholder upon request submitted in writing to us at the following address: Regional Management Corp., 979 Batesville Road, Suite B, Greer, South Carolina, 29651, Attention: Corporate Secretary, or by calling(864) 448-7000. Any stockholder who wants to receive separate copies of our Annual Report on Form10-K and Proxy Statement in the future, or who is currently receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for his or her household, should contact his or her bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or contact us at the above address and telephone number.

Other Business

The Board is not aware of any matters, other than those specified above, to come before the Annual Meeting for action by the stockholders. However, if any matter requiring a vote of the stockholders should be duly presented for a vote at the Annual Meeting, then the persons named in the form of proxy card intend to vote such proxy in accordance with their best judgment.

 

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting | 67

Regional Management Corp. | Proxy Statement for 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders | 66


LOGO

REGIONAL MANAGEMENT CORP.

979 Batesville Road, SuiteBATESVILLE ROAD, SUITE B

Greer, GREER, SC 29651

VOTE29651SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTEVOTE BY INTERNET Before Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com

or scan the QR Barcode above. Use the Internetinternet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M.p.m. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date.on May 18, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the website and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/RM2022. You may attend the meeting via the internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards, and annual reports electronically viae-mail or the Internet.internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internetinternet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

 

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

 

For

All

Withhold All

For All

Except

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the election of the nominees for director named below.

 

1.     Election of Directors

        Nominees

01    Jonathan D.Brown                        02    Roel C. Campos                         03    Maria Contreras-Sweet                         04    Michael R. Dunn                        05    Steven J. Freiberg

06    Peter R. Knitzer                             07    Alvaro G. de Molina                 08    Carlos Palomares

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3:

ForAgainstAbstain

2.   Ratification of the appointment of RSM US LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

3.   Advisory vote to approve executive compensation.

LOGO

NOTE: THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY RATIFIES AND CONFIRMS ALL THAT SAID AGENTS, OR ANY OF THEM OR THEIR SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE HEREOF, AND ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING, THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY STATEMENT, AND THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K TO STOCKHOLDERS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018.

Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date


LOGO

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, 2018 Annual Report on

Form 10-K, and Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com.

LOGO

REGIONAL MANAGEMENT CORP.

Annual Meeting of Stockholders

April 25, 2019 at 8:00 AM EDT

This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors.

The undersigned stockholder of Regional Management Corp. hereby appoints Peter R. Knitzer and Brian J. Fisher as Proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all of the shares of common stock, $0.10 par value per share, of the Company held of record by the undersigned on March 1, 2019, at the Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company to be held on April 25, 2019, or any adjournment thereof.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER SPECIFIED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. THIS PROXY, IF DULY EXECUTED AND RETURNED, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, IF NO INSTRUCTION TO THE CONTRARY IS INDICATED. THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR JUDGMENT.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side